LiteSpeed Information wrote:
We glad to introduce you LiteSpeed Web Server 1.1.
Mind explaining this?
$ telnet litespeedtech.com 80
HEAD / HTTP/1.1
Host: litespeedtech.com
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 16:36:18 GMT
Server: Apache
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 12:41, Leif K-Brooks wrote:
LiteSpeed Information wrote:
We glad to introduce you LiteSpeed Web Server 1.1.
Mind explaining this?
$ telnet litespeedtech.com 80
HEAD / HTTP/1.1
Host: litespeedtech.com
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 16:36:18 GMT
lol
From: Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Leif K-Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: LiteSpeed Information [EMAIL PROTECTED],Php-General (E-mail)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PHP] LiteSpeed Web Server 1.1
Date: 08 Oct 2003 12:44:52 -0400
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 12:41, Leif K-Brooks wrote
Hi,
I am thinking of using LiteSpeed on a dedicated account that our company has
reciently purchased (P4 2.0GHZ, Linux, 80gb space, 100gb bandwidth.etc),
anybody out there already using it and facing any problems?
One of the main reasons we want to use it is because of PHP/JSP and
Mind explaining this?
Not at all, :-), this is not the first time, people questions why we
still use Apache.
$ telnet litespeedtech.com 80
HEAD / HTTP/1.1
Host: litespeedtech.com
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 16:36:18 GMT
Server: Apache
Ryan,
Thank you for your interest.
Our recommendation is, to setup your server environment with Apache
first, make sure every thing works, then run LiteSpeed in parallel on
different port, sharing the document root, then stop Apache and switch
LiteSpeed to port 80. If anything goes wrong,
LiteSpeed Information wrote:
Thank you for your interest.
Our recommendation is, to setup your server environment with Apache
first, make sure every thing works, then run LiteSpeed in parallel on
different port, sharing the document root, then stop Apache and switch
LiteSpeed to port 80. If
Our recommendation is, to setup your server environment with Apache
first, make sure every thing works, then run LiteSpeed in parallel on
different port, sharing the document root, then stop Apache and
switch LiteSpeed to port 80. If anything goes wrong, switch back to
Apache. The migration
LiteSpeed Information wrote:
What we are waiting for are extra security features: chroot(almost
done) and auto-ban. They are not available on Apache either we believe.
If they aren't available with Apache either, why are you still using it?
--
The above message is encrypted with double rot13
On Thursday 09 October 2003 00:44, Robert Cummings wrote:
*heheh* That's like the smarty template site not using smarty. Or back
in the day when hotmail was owned by Microsoft but still running off
linux.
I believe it's still the case. The frontend runs on MS servers but the backend
which
If they aren't available with Apache either, why are you still using it?
No doubt, Apache is a good web server, everyone use it. ;-)
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
LiteSpeed Information wrote:
No doubt, Apache is a good web server, everyone use it. ;-)
What the heck?
--
The above message is encrypted with double rot13 encoding. Any unauthorized attempt
to decrypt it will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
--
PHP General Mailing List
No doubt, Apache is a good web server, everyone use it. ;-)
What the heck?
Is this thread headed somewhere?
Kirk
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 16:48, Johnson, Kirk wrote:
No doubt, Apache is a good web server, everyone use it. ;-)
What the heck?
Is this thread headed somewhere?
Into the future? :/
Cheers,
Rob.
--
..
| InterJinn Application
No doubt, Apache is a good web server, everyone use it. ;-)
What the heck?
Is this thread headed somewhere?
Sorry about this, Kirk. This thread should stop here. We can discuss it
off the list if needed.
I hate to continue this thread at all, but...
-Original Message-
From: Jason Wong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 9 October 2003 6:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thursday 09 October 2003 00:44, Robert Cummings wrote:
*heheh* That's like the smarty template site not
and is not a
threat wewill be able to sleep during nights and safe from this kind of
nightmares .
cheers!.
DPC
From: Andrew Whyte [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PHP] Hotmail servers, Was RE: [PHP] LiteSpeed Web Server 1.1
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 07:58:08 +1000
I hate
Dpcma Metalito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
Why don´t we stop talking about Microsoft and products that they don´t
own?
Reason: Can you imagine that Microsoft would show interest about PHP?
Can
you imagine Ms Visual PHP? we´ll get a non-working scripting non-free
language while Microsoft
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 11:56:51AM -0400, LiteSpeed Information wrote:
:
: We glad to introduce you LiteSpeed Web Server 1.1.
So it is basically like TUX, a kernel-based web server?
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
So it is basically like TUX, a kernel-based web server?
No, it runs completely in user space and be able to match TUX's
performance for static content.
Best regards,
LiteSpeed Team
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Wha? chroot is a good thing to have, even though it's not available in
apache... and they're not using it, yet- they want to be...
Maybe I misunderstood you?
On Wednesday 08 October 2003 12:51 pm, Leif K-Brooks wrote:
LiteSpeed Information wrote:
What we are waiting for are extra security
Did I miss the PHP question in this post?
LiteSpeed Information wrote:
We glad to introduce you LiteSpeed Web Server 1.1.
About:
LiteSpeed Web Server is a full-featured, high-performance, secure, and
easy-to-use Web server that runs on Unix and Linux. It supports
HTTP/1.1, SSL, CGI, FastCGI,
On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 00:09, John Nichel wrote:
Did I miss the PHP question in this post?
Oh nooo, if you look real close you can see it buried way down
near the bottom. :/
content, PHP performance meets or exceeds that of Apache's mod_php. SSL
performance is doubled at least..
23 matches
Mail list logo
