Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-DB] Cross site authentication

2001-09-20 Thread Justin Buist
My reason for using SSL was that the username/password combination wouldn't be transmitted in plaintext... that's all. If you're passing the creditials in plaintext to the Win2k machine though going to SSL for the auth on PHP/Linux wouldn't really make any sense I suppose. Justin Buist Trident

RE: [PHP] Re: [PHP-DB] Cross site authentication

2001-09-19 Thread Hoover, Josh
A combonation of IP restriction and basic authentication over SSL, while not ideal, would probably be better than most alternatives I can think of. Josh Hoover KnowledgeStorm, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Searching for a new IT solution for your company? Need to improve your product marketing? Visit

Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-DB] Cross site authentication

2001-09-19 Thread Evan Nemerson
If you need the data to be secure, you could probably just encrypt it with mcrypt, if you want to make sure it wasn't forged, you want to have A sign the data, then have B check it. If I were you, I would look at GNU Privacy Guard. You can just use some backticks and you're set. If you have

Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-DB] Cross site authentication

2001-09-19 Thread Evan Nemerson
SSL would be useless. It has no facilities for authentication, which is what we need here. Basically, SSL encrypts communications between two computers- it doesn't care which two and is therefore vulnerable to man-in-the-middle attacks. On Wednesday 19 September 2001 08:22, you wrote: