On Friday 13 July 2007 22:38, Robert Cummings wrote:
in which the sender is responsible for storing the mail until the
intended recipient retrieves it seems like a good start.
Bleh, that's so easily solvable for spammers. Create one real message,
then softllink it for every actual email
On Mon, 2007-07-16 at 23:04 +0800, Crayon Shin Chan wrote:
On Friday 13 July 2007 22:38, Robert Cummings wrote:
in which the sender is responsible for storing the mail until the
intended recipient retrieves it seems like a good start.
Bleh, that's so easily solvable for spammers.
Sorry, www.textit.biz
Cheers
-Original Message-
From: Dan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 July 2007 17:52
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] SMS questions
Might want to retry that link, it's broken.
- Dan
Steve Perkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL
On Thu, July 12, 2007 7:07 pm, Brian Dunning wrote:
Here's another thing that would be nice: A web service to look up the
carrier for a cell number. That way you could simply send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], though this would still be only a partial
solution. This is a lot harder now that
On Thu, July 12, 2007 6:39 pm, Brian Dunning wrote:
Hi all - I've been looking at a number of the commercial service
providers for bulk SMS messaging, most of whom have PHP APIs. But
since they are selling something they don't answer my question
Is there any (legal, legitimate) way to
It's annoying as crap to work with them.
But if they were not so vigilant and picuyane, you know what we'd have?
A zillion spam phone messages ringing your cell day and night from all
kinds of idiots.
Do you really want that?
I sure don't.
Give them at least some credit for trying to be
On Friday 13 July 2007 14:07, Richard Lynch wrote:
I'd give a lot of money to be able to teleport back in time and yell
at the email designer folks to tell them just how horrible a mess they
were making... :-)
But you have to give them credit for designing something so scaleable that
even
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 22:30 +0800, Crayon Shin Chan wrote:
On Friday 13 July 2007 14:07, Richard Lynch wrote:
I'd give a lot of money to be able to teleport back in time and yell
at the email designer folks to tell them just how horrible a mess they
were making... :-)
But you have to
Might want to retry that link, it's broken.
- Dan
Steve Perkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Richard makes some good points.
Further to the original posting though, I have a friend who works with
this
SMS stuff, and out of interest asked him about it. Here is
On Fri, July 13, 2007 9:38 am, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 22:30 +0800, Crayon Shin Chan wrote:
On Friday 13 July 2007 14:07, Richard Lynch wrote:
I'd give a lot of money to be able to teleport back in time and
yell
at the email designer folks to tell them just how
Brian,
I was experimenting late last year using PHP to send SMS messages. I think
there is a
lot of potential in the marketplace around SMS. But most of the phone
companies wouldnt
even talk to me and all i was trying to do was hit a development API to test
some code out.
im almost certain you
Brian,
Here's another thing that would be nice: A web service to look up the
carrier for a cell number. That way you could simply send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], though this would still be only a partial
solution. This is a lot harder now that numbers are transportable
between carriers.
Here's another thing that would be nice: A web service to look up the
carrier for a cell number. That way you could simply send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], though this would still be only a partial
solution. This is a lot harder now that numbers are transportable
between carriers.
I
[snip]
...schtuff
[/snip]
Please, do not cast aspersions upon the telcos, for those of us who work
in the industry cannot even get some of what you are talking about. We
have a vendor that provides the SMS part and they will not expose the
SMS API to us (not all SMS platforms are equal
14 matches
Mail list logo