[snip]
I'm trying to build a class to handle various SQL functions. One of them
is to take a query, and return all rows. Here's what I have so far:
function selectRows( $sql )
{
$count = 0;
$results = mysql_query( $sql, DB::connect() );
$data =
Hi,
In order to get all of the data back you are going to have to loop
through it and return the array so that it will be available for
manipulation.
Hmm.. I suspected this might be the case. I have modified my
functiona bit:
function selectRows( $sql )
From: Dan Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In order to get all of the data back you are going to have to loop
through it and return the array so that it will be available for
manipulation.
Hmm.. I suspected this might be the case. I have modified my
functiona bit:
function
Hi,
$array = array();
$results = mysql_query( $sql, DB::connect() );
while($data = mysql_fetch_array($result))
{ $array[] = $data; }
return $array;
No need to loop through $data.
Ahh, thanks for that tip. That's much cleaner.
-Dan Joseph
--
PHP General Mailing List
John W. Holmes wrote:
Change that to:
$array = array();
$results = mysql_query( $sql, DB::connect() );
while($data = mysql_fetch_array($result))
{ $array[] = $data; }
return $array;
Would there be any speed/performance issuse with using something like...
array_push ( $array, $data );
vs.
$array[]
Hi,
Would there be any speed/performance issuse with using something like...
array_push ( $array, $data );
vs.
$array[] = $data;
They seem to react the same in my test script.
-Dan Joseph
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit:
On Tue, 2004-08-10 at 08:33, John Nichel wrote:
John W. Holmes wrote:
Change that to:
$array = array();
$results = mysql_query( $sql, DB::connect() );
while($data = mysql_fetch_array($result))
{ $array[] = $data; }
return $array;
Would there be any speed/performance issuse
Robby Russell wrote:
Run some tests and let us know. ;-)
I'd be interested in knowing as well.
Not really worth worrying about according to this...
array_push() averaged 0.20226655006409 seconds when running the test 10
times
array[] averaged 0.20317406654358 seconds when running the test 10
John Nichel wrote:
John W. Holmes wrote:
Change that to:
$array = array();
$results = mysql_query( $sql, DB::connect() );
while($data = mysql_fetch_array($result))
{ $array[] = $data; }
return $array;
Would there be any speed/performance issuse with using something like...
array_push ( $array,
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 10:31:36 -0400, Dan Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I'm trying to build a class to handle various SQL functions.
One of them is to take a query, and return all rows. Here's what I have so
far:
function selectRows( $sql )
{
Hi,
Of course, this begs the question of why you're re-implementing what
has been done so many times in the past.
http://pear.php.net/package/DB
http://pear.php.net/package/MDB
http://pear.php.net/package/MDB2
http://adodb.sourceforge.net/
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 13:37:50 -0400, Dan Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Of course, this begs the question of why you're re-implementing what
has been done so many times in the past.
http://pear.php.net/package/DB
http://pear.php.net/package/MDB
http://pear.php.net/package/MDB2
I'm building a class for use with our PHP applications.
Packages
like what you've linked me to are nice, but we need a little flexibility
here, so we're writing a few methods of our own.
Flexibility?? Those classes are very flexible and have many useful
utility methods. In
From: Dan Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Of course, this begs the question of why you're re-implementing what
has been done so many times in the past.
http://pear.php.net/package/DB
http://pear.php.net/package/MDB
http://pear.php.net/package/MDB2
http://adodb.sourceforge.net/
http://pear.php.net/package/DB
http://pear.php.net/package/MDB
http://pear.php.net/package/MDB2
http://adodb.sourceforge.net/
http://www.phpclasses.org/browse/package/20.html
I'm building a class for use with our PHP applications.
Packages
like what you've linked me
At 10:26 AM -0700 8/10/04, Justin Patrin wrote:
Of course, this begs the question of why you're re-implementing what
has been done so many times in the past.
At 11:56 AM -0700 8/10/04, Ed Lazor wrote:
Hey, while you guys are talking about those DB classes, I've always opted to
not use them because
16 matches
Mail list logo
