Re[2]: [PHP] PHP editor

2004-04-15 Thread Richard Davey
Hello Robert, Thursday, April 15, 2004, 12:34:09 PM, you wrote: RC Sounds like you suffer from no-accelerator-itis. Using one of the PHP RC accelerators will make whitespace concerns pointless since they operate Not everyone can do this though Rob, I certainly cannot employ any kind of PHP

Re[2]: [PHP] PHP editor

2004-04-15 Thread Tom Rogers
Hi, Friday, April 16, 2004, 2:48:03 AM, you wrote: CWP Arthur Radulescu mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] CWP on Thursday, April 15, 2004 4:48 AM said: Not exactly... I was not reffering to PHP files... The white spaces from a template file will make double the size of certain files when they are

Re[2]: [PHP] PHP editor

2004-04-15 Thread Richard Davey
Hello Lowell, Thursday, April 15, 2004, 4:00:03 PM, you wrote: LA I just installed Zend Studio because I was able to buy it through Adobe LA at a discount when upgrading GoLive. I've been comfortable working in LA the source editor of GoLive, and the new version has improved support LA for PHP,

Re[2]: [PHP] PHP editor

2004-04-15 Thread Richard Davey
Hello Chris, Thursday, April 15, 2004, 6:15:55 PM, you wrote: CB Not to be too pedantic, but you could probably reduce the above CB to a single line function: Not to be even more pedantic, but isn't this entirely pointless anyway? Modems have long compressed ASCII streams - that 50KB of blank

Re: Re[2]: [PHP] PHP editor

2004-04-15 Thread Arthur Radulescu
I fully agree with you but as I have mentioned the first time Zend seems to be to slow for fast editing... And sometimes it really takes too much from the computer resources... I spend around 8 to 10 hours a day inside of Zend Studio (it's open behind this email window as I type) and I couldn't

Re[2]: [PHP] PHP editor

2004-04-15 Thread Richard Davey
Hello Greg, Thursday, April 15, 2004, 7:35:20 PM, you wrote: GD All the styles and javascript work fine. HTML parsers don't give a rats ass GD about newlines, tabs, and carriage returns so why have them.. Makes the GD output easier to compress as well. Got to agree here, I remember back in the

Re[2]: [PHP] PHP editor

2004-04-15 Thread Richard Davey
Hello Greg, Thursday, April 15, 2004, 7:57:12 PM, you wrote: GD Well at my shop more efficient = right and less efficient = wrong. Passing a potentially huge string through a replacement function for every single page doesn't really = efficient in my shop. YMMV. -- Best regards, Richard

Re[2]: [PHP] PHP editor

2004-04-15 Thread Richard Davey
Hello Greg, Friday, April 16, 2004, 1:44:57 AM, you wrote: Passing a potentially huge string through a replacement function for every single page doesn't really = efficient in my shop. YMMV. GD We use Turke MMCache so it's not every single page. GD Besides that CPUs are way cheaper than

Re[2]: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

2003-09-25 Thread Tom Rogers
Hi, Thursday, September 25, 2003, 10:40:27 PM, you wrote: DM lmao .. good one. From: pete M [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use? Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 10:59:19 +0100 I write my code with pencil and paper and then scan it.. Dont need an editor !

Re[2]: [PHP] PHP Editor

2001-05-11 Thread Adaran (Marc E. Brinkmann)
Hi Grishick, Grishick Nothing is better then HomeSite Agreed ;-) --- EnjoY, Adaran ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) check http://www.adaran.net -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL