php-general Digest 2 Dec 2007 09:35:27 - Issue 5159
Topics (messages 265372 through 265375):
include config.php does not work anymore after PHP 5.2
265372 by: wmac
265373 by: Casey
265374 by: wmac
265375 by: wmac
Administrivia:
To subscribe to the digest,
php-general Digest 2 Dec 2007 22:10:35 - Issue 5160
Topics (messages 265376 through 265392):
Re: include config.php does not work anymore after PHP 5.2
265376 by: Andrés Robinet
265379 by: Richard Heyes
265386 by: Mike Yrabedra
Need help for DOM xsd validation
Okay... show us config.php.
On Dec 1, 2007 11:22 PM, wmac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I have been working with PHP 5.0 and my register_globals has always been
Off since PHP 4.1
Today I upgraded to PHP 5.2 and now neither of my include config.php work.
Neither of the variables defined
Hello
This is the same thing I always use.
?
$host=localhost;
$user=root;
$password=123;
$db=stud;
$activation=1;
$MAXATTACHSIZE = 100;
$ATTACHDIRPATH=e:/www/stud/lattach/;
?
By the way, I installed php 4.4.7 and everything is fine with this
version though register_globals is
Thank you People. Someone mentioned the problem.
It is the starting PHP tag.
I never never thought my config.php might have problem. I have used
this config.php for almost 6 years and never had problem (the first
time I have forgotten to add it 6 years ago because I had migrated
from ASP. I
-Original Message-
From: wmac [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2007 6:35 AM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] include config.php does not work anymore after PHP
5.2
Thank you People. Someone mentioned the problem.
It is the starting PHP tag.
Hi,
I'm trying to load XML data into my script. That's no problem. The
problem is, that the schema validation fails all time after loading a
new document:
Warning: DOMDocument::schemaValidate()
[function.DOMDocument-schemaValidate]: Element
The 4th significant digit in both cases is '5' but in the first case, it's
rounded down but in the second case it is rounded up. Is sprintf() basing
it's decision on the value of the 3rd significant digit? If so, why?
Shouldn't rounding decisions be based on subsequent digits and not
preceding
I never never thought my config.php might have problem. I have used
this config.php for almost 6 years and never had problem (the first
time I have forgotten to add it 6 years ago because I had migrated
from ASP. I have copied this wrong config.php to some other projects.
Have you ever migrated
Hi,
I'm trying to load XML data into my script. That's no problem. The
problem is, that the
schema validation fails all time after loading a new document:
Warning: DOMDocument::schemaValidate()
[function.DOMDocument-schemaValidate]: Element
'{http://www.desktopportal.de/Preferences}user':
I have now tried to add many of the security hints on a web page and
come to a problem.
I am checking if the allowed fields match the sent fields.
From the database I get the information if a checkbox is checked or not:
?php if($DB_a ==y) {
$checked=checked;
} else {
$checked=;
}
Ronald Wiplinger wrote:
How can I force a n for not checked in the input field? or how can I
solve that?
Either use radio buttons or a drop down for the input field.
Stephen
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Stephen wrote:
Ronald Wiplinger wrote:
How can I force a n for not checked in the input field? or how can I
solve that?
Either use radio buttons or a drop down for the input field.
Thanks!
Stephen
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit:
First of all, using y and n for boolean values (such as a checkbox) is
very sloppy. n is boolean True. A boolean value should evaluate correctly
in a boolean context. For that, you should use 1 and 0 for your values.
What I usually do is this:
input type=hidden name=foo value=0 /
input
I did once, if I remember once, this strategy:
input type=hidden name=R_a value=n
input type=checkbox name=R_a value=y ?php echo $checked ?
If checked, you will have value y. Though, if unchecked, or it was
checked and visitor unchecked, the value should be n.
;)
-afan
Ronald Wiplinger
on 12/2/07 2:22 AM, wmac at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I have been working with PHP 5.0 and my register_globals has always been
Off since PHP 4.1
Today I upgraded to PHP 5.2 and now neither of my include config.php work.
Neither of the variables defined in include files are even
Just to add my two cents -
I don't think it matters much what tokens you use to represent true
or false, since you're going to be explicitly checking them on the
server end anyway. I can't see much difference in principle between,
for example:
if ($_GET['foo'] == 'y')...
and
nice!
but to avoid confusion it should read (assuming that $checked is a boolean
variable):
input type=hidden name=foo value=0/
input type=checkbox name=foo value=1?php if($checked) echo '
checked'; ?/
IMHO
Larry Garfield wrote:
First of all, using y and n for boolean values (such as a
At 12:36 PM -0600 12/2/07, Larry Garfield wrote:
First of all, using y and n for boolean values (such as a checkbox) is
very sloppy. n is boolean True. A boolean value should evaluate correctly
in a boolean context. For that, you should use 1 and 0 for your values.
What I usually do is
At 6:08 AM -0500 12/2/07, Christoph wrote:
If the general rule is to round up for 5s when preceeding is odd
and round down when even, that's not occuring here when using
round().
No, you're not reading what I wrote. I said MY general rule is to
round up when the preceding digit is even,
On Dec 2, 2007 1:08 PM, tedd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 12:36 PM -0600 12/2/07, Larry Garfield wrote:
First of all, using y and n for boolean values (such as a checkbox) is
very sloppy. n is boolean True. A boolean value should evaluate correctly
in a boolean context. For that, you should
On Saturday 01 December 2007, chris smith wrote:
Considering the rest of the off-topic questions that regularly get
asked on this list it's a bit much to single out this one particular
post.
I didn't single it out, it just happened to be at the top of the pile at
the the time. It was also
At 8:56 AM +0100 11/29/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks for me a bit like a philosophical question, but maybe you have
something to say about it nevertheless. A good thing for me would be
something like: up to 125 lines of code you get an adequate performance with
simply parsing it every time,
Hi,
Job onsite at Telecom giant in Finland (guess what telecom giant). Please
see http://jobs.perl.org/job/7322 for more info. Send CV if you're
interested to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/Peter
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
At 1:23 PM -0800 12/2/07, Casey wrote:
On Dec 2, 2007 1:08 PM, tedd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You don't need to do anything.
input type=checkbox name=likes_pie /
When it's submitted:
?php
if ($_GET['likes_pie']) // checked
else // not
That's true unless you're pulling data in from somewhere
Do failed tests mean I absolutely should NOT install. Or is it normal to
have a few fails? Try two different versions, all have some failure.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Sunday 02 December 2007, Daniel Brown wrote:
There are a great deal of highly-intelligent people on this list, so why
not take advantage of that resource?
I do, that's why I'm on the list.
So until you've been around enough to truly earn your right to
tell someone far more
At 6:24 AM +0800 12/3/07, Crayon Shin Chan wrote:
It was also helped by the fact that the OP, who is
apparently, renowned for programming in rocks since the time before
binary was invented, ought to know list etiquette better than most.
That's world renowned, if you please. :-)
But just to
-Original Message-
From: Warren Vail [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 2:17 PM
To: 'Jochem Maas'
Cc: 'afan pasalic'; 'Daevid Vincent'; 'php-general'
Subject: RE: [PHP] including parenthesis, space and dashes in
a phone number
I did not know that about
I should have been more clear. I do *store* the numbers sans punctuation, but
that's trivial to accomplish as we've seen. I do like to display it however
with the nice parens and hyphens. Hence opposite. :)
-Original Message-
From: afan pasalic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
2007/12/1, Christoph Boget [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Why does
sprintf( '%.03f', 0.1525 )
return 0.152 while
sprintf( '%.03f', 0.1575 )
return 0.158?
Welcome to the world of f floating point numbers. Discrete mathematics,
leave all hope, ye that enter.
It's the way floating point
2007/12/2, tedd [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
To me, good structure starts at the function level. Like the lattice
of a crystal, coding grows and reflects the most basic element. Keep
that element consistent and you'll find that it will be reflected in
everything you do.
How's that for philosophical?
At 8:56 PM -0300 12/2/07, Martin Alterisio wrote:
2007/12/2, tedd mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]:
To me, good structure starts at the function level. Like the lattice
of a crystal, coding grows and reflects the most basic element. Keep
that element consistent and you'll find that it
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 15:14 +1000, Malcolm Green wrote:
Hi Support:
I've moved into a new role and inherited a system which uses the 'STRFTIME'
function to create a filename in the form 'strftime(%Y%m%d)'; the
filename is supposed to be today's date. (Note I've left out the file
extension
Hi Support:
I've moved into a new role and inherited a system which uses the 'STRFTIME'
function to create a filename in the form 'strftime(%Y%m%d)'; the
filename is supposed to be today's date. (Note I've left out the file
extension for clarity.)
I've noticed that system creates the wrong
35 matches
Mail list logo
