php-general Digest 16 Aug 2008 14:08:00 - Issue 5627
Topics (messages 278208 through 278226):
Re: SESSION problem
278208 by: VamVan
278216 by: tedd
278217 by: Stut
278218 by: Ashley Sheridan
278219 by: Sabine Richter
278220 by: tedd
Joey a écrit :
Does anyone know of a good php based classified system?
What do you mean by classified system ?
--
Mickaël Wolff aka Lupus Michaelis
http://lupusmic.org
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Anders Norrbring a écrit :
I'm running out of ideas to where to look for this, so can you please
give
me some pointers?
I guess it is that you're seeking for :
http://fr.php.net/manual/en/outcontrol.configuration.php#ini.implicit-
flush
Thank you!
Worked just as I want..
Anders
pico :-)
ed baby; its all about ed!
hexedit /dev/sda1
I do seriously use pico. My editing needs on Linux are small, via a
puTTY window and pico is the most like a Windows editor that I've used
(compared to vi say with its command/edit modes). I've used it for
years, am very
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Shawn McKenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
It flance wrote:
Hi,
What do you think is the best php editor for linux.
I'm using the Debian distribution.
Thanks
I use Aptana which is based on eclipse and has built-in HTML/JS/PHP?SVN
stuff. Also a cool
Many thanks, Todd, and others.
Matěj czech_d3vl0p3r Grabovský
Původní zpráva
Od: Boyd, Todd M. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Předmět: RE: [PHP] How to submit form via PHP
Datum: 15.8.2008 22:43:40
-Original Message-
From:
At 8:02 PM -0700 8/15/08, VamVan wrote:
Tedd,
I think according to PHP manual. Session_start() must be the first
line in the code. Dont worry it will remember your session until you
close the browser and also it wont duplicate it.
VamVan:
Yes, I thought that as well and practiced it for
On 16 Aug 2008, at 12:36, tedd wrote:
At 8:02 PM -0700 8/15/08, VamVan wrote:
Tedd,
I think according to PHP manual. Session_start() must be the first
line in the code. Dont worry it will remember your session until
you close the browser and also it wont duplicate it.
VamVan:
Yes, I
session_start() doesn't have to be the first line in the code, but it
does have to occur before ANY content sent to the browser, and this
includes any headers as well. Generally speaking, it does no harm to
have it as the first line of your PHP code
Ash
www.ashleysheridan.co.uk
Hello Tedd,
it seems to be a naming problem. You may not use a numeric value for a
variable name to store in $_SESSION.
By assigning it to $_SESSION, you get a
Notice: Unknown: Skipping numeric key 1 in Unknown on line 0
and in your second script a
Notice: Undefined offset: 1 in
At 12:40 PM +0100 8/16/08, Stut wrote:
On 16 Aug 2008, at 12:36, tedd wrote:
The problem here is can I use a variable within a $_SESSION[] declaration?
Like so:
$_SESSION[$var]
I haven't really been following this thread but using a variable
like that is perfectly valid. $_SESSION is no
At 2:09 PM +0200 8/16/08, Sabine Richter wrote:
Hello Tedd,
it seems to be a naming problem. You may not use a numeric value for
a variable name to store in $_SESSION.
By assigning it to $_SESSION, you get a
Notice: Unknown: Skipping numeric key 1 in Unknown on line 0
and in your second
Hello Tedd,
tedd schrieb:
At 2:09 PM +0200 8/16/08, Sabine Richter wrote:
Hello Tedd,
it seems to be a naming problem. You may not use a numeric value for a
variable name to store in $_SESSION.
By assigning it to $_SESSION, you get a
Notice: Unknown: Skipping numeric key 1 in Unknown on
On 16 Aug 2008, at 13:20, tedd wrote:
At 12:40 PM +0100 8/16/08, Stut wrote:
On 16 Aug 2008, at 12:36, tedd wrote:
The problem here is can I use a variable within a $_SESSION[]
declaration?
Like so:
$_SESSION[$var]
I haven't really been following this thread but using a variable
like
At 2:11 PM +0100 8/16/08, Stut wrote:
Ahh, I see the problem. You've never been able to use numbers as
keys at the root level of the $_SESSION array. It's not a bug, it's
just the way it is. I've just checked the documentation and can't
find an obvious reference to this limitation which is
At 2:45 PM +0200 8/16/08, Sabine Richter wrote:
Yes, our mails overlaped each other (Do you say that in english? My
english is not the best.)
Sabine:
Your English is fine -- much better than my de for certain.
By the way: I tried your initial code and I had no problem with the
variable
On 16 Aug 2008, at 14:46, tedd wrote:
At 2:11 PM +0100 8/16/08, Stut wrote:
Ahh, I see the problem. You've never been able to use numbers as
keys at the root level of the $_SESSION array. It's not a bug, it's
just the way it is. I've just checked the documentation and can't
find an obvious
Hi,
Don't think me a money grabbing bast (well, I guess I am...) but I'd
just like to know if you've got any input on trying to get people to
cough up some readies in return for the mounds of free code I give
away. I've updated my licensing page just now, and hopefully this will
convince more
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Richard Heyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Don't think me a money grabbing bast (well, I guess I am...) but I'd
just like to know if you've got any input on trying to get people to
cough up some readies in return for the mounds of free code I give
away. I've
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Stut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wish I understood the reason why it's like this but I've never looked into
the session extension in that level of detail, but I doubt such a limitation
would exist if there was not a very good reason for it. But again, I don't
Sell support.
Sell obfuscated code.
Sell your software but make the source available upon sale (completely
allowed under all open source licenses).
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Eric Butera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Richard Heyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tend to prefer assigning all my session variables to an array, which
itself is a member of the $_SESSION array. For example:
$_SESSION[]
Array
(
[myarray] = Array
(
[someitem] = x
[someitem2] = y
At 3:06 PM +0100 8/16/08, Stut wrote:
Not really, since I would never name a session variable 1, or 2, or
5318008 - I would always put those in the session in a named array.
That's understandable. But, if you came from a background that
predated associate arrays, then using numeric indexes
On 16 Aug 2008, at 17:03, tedd wrote:
I understand what you are saying -- semantics are important. But if
there is a need for temporary place to store values I don't consider
it bad form to store them in a numerically indexed array.
For example, if a user was going to purchase up to 10
Hi Tedd,
tedd schrieb:
At 2:45 PM +0200 8/16/08, Sabine Richter wrote:
Yes, our mails overlaped each other (Do you say that in english? My
english is not the best.)
Sabine:
Your English is fine -- much better than my de for certain.
Thanks :-)
By the way: I tried your initial code and I
At 5:15 PM +0100 8/16/08, Stut wrote:
Instead I assert you would have...
$_SESSION['user_purchase'][0] = $item0;
...
$_SESSION['user_purchase'][9] = $item9;
which is perfectly valid.
I'll try to re-word my basic point... I personally consider it bad
to even want to use numeric indexes at the
Sabine:
I understand the problem now.
But to get to my basic question to you, namely using this link:
http://www.webbytedd.com/b2/session-test1/index.php
-- does SESSION[20] and SESSION[test2] show anything in the second
step (Step 2) or are the results blank?
Cheers,
tedd
--
---
tedd schrieb:
Sabine:
I understand the problem now.
But to get to my basic question to you, namely using this link:
http://www.webbytedd.com/b2/session-test1/index.php
-- does SESSION[20] and SESSION[test2] show anything in the second step
(Step 2) or are the results blank?
Oh, ok,
28 matches
Mail list logo
