php-general Digest 29 Oct 2008 07:47:06 - Issue 5761
Topics (messages 282533 through 282557):
Re: clear a mysql table
282533 by: Jim Lucas
282550 by: Lupus Michaelis
Waste of storage space?
282534 by: Frank Arensmeier
282542 by: Chris
282543 by:
php-general Digest 29 Oct 2008 21:11:48 - Issue 5762
Topics (messages 282558 through 282585):
Re: Waste of storage space?
282558 by: Frank Arensmeier
282560 by: Frank Arensmeier
282561 by: Frank Arensmeier
282562 by: Maciek Sokolewicz
282573 by:
Från: Yeti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Datum: ti 28 okt 2008 23.07.11 GMT+01:00
Till: Frank Arensmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ämne: Re: [PHP] Waste of storage space?
Hej,
why not do a simple strlen() before comparison?
Like if strlen (or mb_strlen()) is less than 50 do not serialize/
compare.
Or Like
28 okt 2008 kl. 23.56 skrev Chris:
1) Store the delta (=the actual change) of a text change. This
could be done by utilizing the Pear package TextDiff. My idea was
to compare the old with the new text with help of the TextDiff
class. I would then grab the array containing the changes
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 23:52 -0400, John Taylor-Johnston wrote:
Could it be this easy?
$chopped= strlen($aFn) - 4;
$filename = $chopped..txt;
printbrfont face='Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif' size=2
color='#99';
include($filename);
print/font;
John Taylor-Johnston wrote:
I
29 okt 2008 kl. 00.00 skrev Maciek Sokolewicz:
Frank Arensmeier wrote:
Hi all.
In short, I am working on a system that allows me to keep track of
changes to a large amount of short texts (a couple of thousand text
snippets, two or three sentences per text). All text is stored in a
29 okt 2008 kl. 01.08 skrev Bastien Koert:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 4:24 PM, Frank Arensmeier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all.
In short, I am working on a system that allows me to keep track of
changes to a large amount of short texts (a couple of thousand text
snippets, two or three
Frank Arensmeier wrote:
29 okt 2008 kl. 00.00 skrev Maciek Sokolewicz:
Frank Arensmeier wrote:
Hi all.
In short, I am working on a system that allows me to keep track of
changes to a large amount of short texts (a couple of thousand text
snippets, two or three sentences per text). All text
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 23:52 -0400, John Taylor-Johnston wrote:
Could it be this easy?
$chopped= strlen($aFn) - 4;
$filename = $chopped..txt;
printbrfont face='Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif' size=2
color='#99';
include($filename);
print/font;
John
technically can I store flash file into Mysql DB using PHP?
what point should I pay attention for that?
Thank you
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Newbie%3A-can-I-store-flash-file-into-Mysql-DB-tp20224150p20224150.html
Sent from the PHP - General mailing list archive at
On 29 Oct 2008, at 10:20, vuthecuong wrote:
technically can I store flash file into Mysql DB using PHP?
Yes.
what point should I pay attention for that?
The blob field type.
But I would recommend against it. Why not store the files on disk and
only store the filenames in the DB?
-Stut
Stut wrote:
On 29 Oct 2008, at 10:20, vuthecuong wrote:
technically can I store flash file into Mysql DB using PHP?
Yes.
what point should I pay attention for that?
The blob field type.
But I would recommend against it. Why not store the files on disk and
only store the
On 29 Oct 2008, at 10:32, vuthecuong wrote:
Stut wrote:
On 29 Oct 2008, at 10:20, vuthecuong wrote:
technically can I store flash file into Mysql DB using PHP?
Yes.
what point should I pay attention for that?
The blob field type.
But I would recommend against it. Why not store the
Stut wrote:
On 29 Oct 2008, at 10:32, vuthecuong wrote:
Stut wrote:
On 29 Oct 2008, at 10:20, vuthecuong wrote:
technically can I store flash file into Mysql DB using PHP?
Yes.
what point should I pay attention for that?
The blob field type.
But I would recommend against it.
Hi,
Anyone know of a good (as opposed to a bad) mailing list manager,
other than freelists.org (which I can't seem to get working).
Thanks.
--
Richard Heyes
HTML5 Graphing for FF, Chrome, Opera and Safari:
http://www.rgraph.org (Updated October 25th)
--
PHP General Mailing List
2008/10/29 Richard Heyes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
Anyone know of a good (as opposed to a bad) mailing list manager,
other than freelists.org (which I can't seem to get working).
Thanks.
Gmail!
--
Dotan Cohen
http://what-is-what.com
http://gibberish.co.il
Dotan Cohen wrote ..
2008/10/29 Richard Heyes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
Anyone know of a good (as opposed to a bad) mailing list manager,
other than freelists.org (which I can't seem to get working).
Thanks.
Gmail!
?!? that's ajoke, right?
i pledge loyalty for gnus mailman
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 6:20 AM, vuthecuong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
technically can I store flash file into Mysql DB using PHP?
what point should I pay attention for that?
Thank you
--
View this message in context:
Thank you for your respons.
I have thought of such a sorting mechanism too. But on the other hand, the
biggest drawback would be that even minor changes that might be really
important could get lost. And my goal is to really keep track on everything
my users do. And, in the long run, the
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 8:57 PM, VamVan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SSO process:
$_POST the Email Address and password
Get Authenticated, Get the COOKIE ( Through Oracle IDM suite SOAP call)
Decrypt the COOKIE ( Through Oracle Enterprise business suite SOAP call)
and get the profile Info
I agree.
Mailman has everything you need from a mailing list and is the defacto
standard.
Besides, with it you only need to press 'reply' not 'Reply all' when
trying to send to the list... unlike this one.
Usually you would setup it up on a subdomain (e.g _lists.__domain.com_)
and can then
Richard Heyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Anyone know of a good (as opposed to a bad) mailing list manager,
other than freelists.org (which I can't seem to get working).
Thanks.
What's wrong with Mailman?
Wolf
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe,
Bastien Koert wrote:
Thank you for your respons.
I have thought of such a sorting mechanism too. But on the other hand, the
biggest drawback would be that even minor changes that might be really
important could get lost. And my goal is to really keep track on everything
my users do. And, in
When it comes to email validation, I would recommend using the IMAP function
which will be both fast and correct:
http://us.php.net/manual/en/function.imap-rfc822-parse-adrlist.php
Otherwise, it's guaranteed that you are having at least some false positives,
and probably some false
Hi,
Ok, disk space is cheap, but you can't avoid the access/seek time penalty
on this.
- Unomi -
Properly indexed, its not that bad...after all its what Dbs do best
--
Bastien
Cat, the other other white meat
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 5:36 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When it comes to email validation, I would recommend using the IMAP function
which will be both fast and correct:
http://us.php.net/manual/en/function.imap-rfc822-parse-adrlist.php
Otherwise, it's guaranteed that you are having at
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's wrong with Mailman?
That's what I'd recommend, too. It's not PHP, but it's tried and
true, tested over years and years, and probably in the millions or
tens of millions of messages handled.
--
/Daniel P. Brown
Bastien Koert wrote:
Hi,
Ok, disk space is cheap, but you can't avoid the access/seek time penalty
on this.
- Unomi -
Properly indexed, its not that bad...after all its what Dbs do best
I only mention this, that while disk space seems a unlimited resource
these days the fact that
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 07:55 +0100, Martin Zvarík wrote:
What I know is that you can control GIMP over the command line = you can
use PHP to do this.
Though I guess GIMP doesn't support PSD files, I had to express myself
anyways.
vuthecuong napsal(a):
Hi all
Is
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 15:22 +, David Lidstone wrote:
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 07:55 +0100, Martin Zvarík wrote:
What I know is that you can control GIMP over the command line = you can
use PHP to do this.
Though I guess GIMP doesn't support PSD files, I had to
I sent an email to the mysql list, but it reminded me of a question I had
for people structuring their PHP code. What's the general way that people
structure their connections? Right now, I spawn off two mysql_connect calls
at the top of the file that includes my database calls, using true for
Waynn Lue wrote:
I sent an email to the mysql list, but it reminded me of a question I had
for people structuring their PHP code. What's the general way that people
structure their connections? Right now, I spawn off two mysql_connect calls
at the top of the file that includes my database
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 08:55 +1100, Chris wrote:
Waynn Lue wrote:
I sent an email to the mysql list, but it reminded me of a question I had
for people structuring their PHP code. What's the general way that people
structure their connections? Right now, I spawn off two mysql_connect calls
Yeah, it's the same user, same everything (for now). But I wonder why
we're seeing these lost connection errors and I'm trying to fix
it--this was one of the things I was investigating.
On 10/29/08, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Waynn Lue wrote:
I sent an email to the mysql list, but it
It's actually a deliberate design decision to have two dbs, because
one's a shared database, and one's application specific.
Thanks,
Waynn
On 10/29/08, Ashley Sheridan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 08:55 +1100, Chris wrote:
Waynn Lue wrote:
I sent an email to the mysql list,
Waynn Lue wrote:
Yeah, it's the same user, same everything (for now). But I wonder why
we're seeing these lost connection errors and I'm trying to fix
it--this was one of the things I was investigating.
Random guess :)
You're overwriting a result or connection variable?
$query = select *
Greetings, Nathan Rixham.
In reply to Your message dated Wednesday, October 22, 2008, 20:54:22,
made this a while back.. might help :)
http://programphp.com/iconv.phps
Sorta... would be wise to have results of this detector cached in some way to
reduce startup times.
But it's nice, very nice
I have the following code as a test:
?php
$a = $_GET['a'];
$b = $_GET['b'];
echo $a .. $b . = ;
$out = $a $b;
echo $out;
//echo 15 2;
?
if I set a to 15 and b to 2 in the URL like so:
test.php?a=15b=2
it outputs zero as the answer. When I run the hard-coded '' operation (the
commented
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 08:55 +1100, Chris wrote:
Waynn Lue wrote:
I sent an email to the mysql list, but it reminded me of a question I had
for people structuring their PHP code. What's the general way that people
structure their connections? Right now, I
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 20:01 -0400, sean greenslade wrote:
I have the following code as a test:
?php
$a = $_GET['a'];
$b = $_GET['b'];
echo $a .. $b . = ;
$out = $a $b;
echo $out;
//echo 15 2;
?
if I set a to 15 and b to 2 in the URL like so:
test.php?a=15b=2
it outputs
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 19:25 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 08:55 +1100, Chris wrote:
Waynn Lue wrote:
I sent an email to the mysql list, but it reminded me of a question I had
for people structuring their PHP code. What's the general
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 19:25 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 08:55 +1100, Chris wrote:
Waynn Lue wrote:
I sent an email to the mysql list, but it reminded me of a question I had
for people
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 20:01 -0400, sean greenslade wrote:
I have the following code as a test:
?php
$a = $_GET['a'];
$b = $_GET['b'];
echo $a .. $b . = ;
$out = $a $b;
echo $out;
//echo 15 2;
?
if I set a to 15 and b to 2 in the URL like so:
test.php?a=15b=2
it
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 19:43 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 19:25 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 08:55 +1100, Chris wrote:
Waynn Lue wrote:
I sent an email to
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 19:43 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 19:25 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 08:55 +1100, Chris wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 19:49 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 19:43 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 19:25 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 19:49 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 19:43 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 19:25 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 19:57 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 19:49 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 19:43 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On
With MySQL, you can change the DB from query to query with
mysql_select_db. The alternative as I stated in my last post is to use
the fully qualified table name (database.table) in your query. MySQL
doesn't care which DB you have open if you do that. In both of these
cases, the same
The answer in your case is not to combine the DBs necessarily, but
consolidate the connections used. Like I said, you can use 2 MySQL DBs
on the same connection in PHP. There's no reason to sacrifice
separation of data.
Forgot about this one until now.. mysql also supports the extended
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 19:57 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 19:49 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 19:43 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
Waynn Lue wrote:
With MySQL, you can change the DB from query to query with
mysql_select_db. The alternative as I stated in my last post is to use
the fully qualified table name (database.table) in your query. MySQL
doesn't care which DB you have open if you do that. In both of these
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 20:12 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
Waynn Lue wrote:
With MySQL, you can change the DB from query to query with
mysql_select_db. The alternative as I stated in my last post is to use
the fully qualified table name (database.table) in your query. MySQL
doesn't care
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 20:12 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
Waynn Lue wrote:
With MySQL, you can change the DB from query to query with
mysql_select_db. The alternative as I stated in my last post is to use
the fully qualified table name (database.table) in your
Bastien Koert a écrit :
We used to do that here, and there was significant performance impact after
the database got to be about 12Gb, with minor impact showing after only a
few Gb. I ended up having to write a script that stripped all the data from
the Db into the file system.
What engine
Waynn Lue wrote:
Yeah, it's the same user, same everything (for now). But I wonder why
we're seeing these lost connection errors and I'm trying to fix
it--this was one of the things I was investigating.
Random guess :)
You're overwriting a result or connection variable?
$query =
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 18:32 -0700, Waynn Lue wrote:
Waynn Lue wrote:
Yeah, it's the same user, same everything (for now). But I wonder why
we're seeing these lost connection errors and I'm trying to fix
it--this was one of the things I was investigating.
Random guess :)
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 9:29 PM, Lupus Michaelis
[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Bastien Koert a écrit :
We used to do that here, and there was significant performance impact
after
the database got to be about 12Gb, with minor impact showing after only a
few Gb. I ended up
58 matches
Mail list logo
