On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:42 PM, Stuart Dallas stut...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24 Mar 2010, at 20:34, Rene Veerman wrote:
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Ashley Sheridan
a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 22:15 +0200, Rene Veerman wrote:
Do you have any proof of this
+1 for top-posting..
proper nettiquette is to put replies beneath the quotes you're
replying to, and deleting the rest.
ultimately this 'rule' of bottomposting is laziness of the ones who
like that style of quoting.
they want everyone to conform to their favorite method, so they can
read more
Rene Veerman wrote:
+1 for top-posting..
proper nettiquette is to put replies beneath the quotes you're
replying to, and deleting the rest.
ultimately this 'rule' of bottomposting is laziness of the ones who
like that style of quoting.
they want everyone to conform to their favorite method, so
Robert Cummings wrote:
Rene Veerman wrote:
+1 for top-posting..
-1 to compensate .
proper nettiquette is to put replies beneath the quotes you're
replying to, and deleting the rest.
ultimately this 'rule' of bottomposting is laziness of the ones who
like that style of quoting.
they want
Daevid Vincent wrote:
Why don't you set up a vote to see how many developers actually *want*
threading. That would be a good indication of whether or not it is
actually worth the PHP development team spending a lot of
time on it at the loss of other features which people want more.
I already
Daevid Vincent wrote:
Well, since I was the one that started this shit-storm, I'll chime in
for a minute... ;-)
If you added threading to the bag of tricks it already has, you're
getting into areas that make it more difficult to pick up for
beginners (and that's not to mention the
MvH / Hans Åhlin
Tel: +46761488019
http://www.kronan-net.com/
irc://irc.freenode.net:6667 - TheCoin
2010/3/25 Rene Veerman rene7...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 6:13 AM, Hans Åhlin ahlin.h...@kronan-net.com wrote:
I admit that if there were native support for threading I
would use it.
Tommy Pham wrote:
I think you're missing my point. Given your current hardware,
software, product list, etc... how long does it take to run your
queries in series? If you were able to run them in parallel and
deliver faster response time to the users, would you implement PHP
thread, if
Tommy Pham wrote:
As such, let's dissect what you mentioned:
1) PHP with internal thread support
2) PHP with external C/C++ thread support
That's not quite what I mentioned, but I'll accept it for the sake of
argument.
* Performance - having external thread support, now you have to call
Tommy Pham wrote:
I don't
use Linux nor an expert in it but implementing custom thread solution
like that means understanding about SELinux vs AppArmor vs Grsecurity
or am I wrong?
Yes, you are wrong. The Posix thread model implemented in the pthread
library in Linux is easy to pick up
Tommy Pham wrote:
As some of you mention that implementing threads will make the DB work
harder than the standard serial operations queries, let me ask you
these then:
* How often does your DB server(s)/cluster utilizes 100% CPU (SMP/MC),
memory, and disk IO?
Assuming we're talking under
Per Jessen wrote:
CPU 100% - rarely, but it happens.
Memory 100% - all the time.
Disk IO 100% - less than all the time, but it's very busy.
FYI, it's actually quite difficult to drive a disk subsystem to
consistent 100% utilization over a period of time. Oracle uses
asynchronous I/O and
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 07:28, Rene Veerman rene7...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 for top-posting..
proper nettiquette is to put replies beneath the quotes you're
replying to, and deleting the rest.
So why are you not doing it?
ultimately this 'rule' of bottomposting is laziness of the ones who
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, Rene Veerman wrote:
+1 for top-posting..
*sigh*. you're joking, right? you're seriously telling me that
there are people who are still sufficiently ignorant and childish that
they're still fighting this top- versus bottom-posting war?
the war is over. the consensus
So I tested two scenario:
- First, I gather all the files selected for the patch and then compress
them together and here is what is displayed:
[Begin display]
The command zip -gr ../../build/Patch-6-3-2_Q3P15.zip * returned a status of
14 and the following output:
adding: bin/ (stored 0%)
Forgot to say, it is the second scenario that generate corrupted zip and
text files with unexpected end of files.
2010/3/25 Bastien Helders eldroskan...@gmail.com
So I tested two scenario:
- First, I gather all the files selected for the patch and then compress
them together and here is what
We recently para-virtualised a Xen / CentOS box which is running script
which uses fsockopen() to get a connection to an SMTP server.
Since the server changes it fails approx 50% of the time with:
php_network_getaddresses: getaddrinfo failed: Temporary failure in name
resolution
We've tried
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 1:46 AM, Per Jessen p...@computer.org wrote:
* If you could implement threads and run those same queries in 2+
threads, the total time saved from queries execution is 1/2 sec or
more, which is pass along as the total response time reduced. Is it
worth it for you
Tommy Pham wrote:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 1:46 AM, Per Jessen p...@computer.org wrote:
* If you could implement threads and run those same queries in 2+
threads, the total time saved from queries execution is 1/2 sec or
more, which is pass along as the total response time reduced. Is it
On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 08:28 +0200, Rene Veerman wrote:
proper nettiquette is to put replies beneath the quotes you're
replying to, and deleting the rest.
ultimately this 'rule' of bottomposting is laziness of the ones who
like that style of quoting.
they want everyone to conform to their
On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 08:11 +0200, Rene Veerman wrote:
right now my cms is 2D, and indeed most of the graphics are static
then.
but i have plans to lift it into 3D, with rooms interacting via
avatars, and then the graphics-selection and avatar-behavior
(animations) selections alone i
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Ashley Sheridan
a...@ashleysheridan.co.ukwrote:
On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 08:11 +0200, Rene Veerman wrote:
right now my cms is 2D, and indeed most of the graphics are static then.
but i have plans to lift it into 3D, with rooms interacting via
avatars, and
On 03/25/2010 03:51 PM, David Lidstone wrote:
We recently para-virtualised a Xen / CentOS box which is running script
which uses fsockopen() to get a connection to an SMTP server.
Since the server changes it fails approx 50% of the time with:
php_network_getaddresses: getaddrinfo failed:
Hi,
I want to properly learn object oriented programming as I've been coding in
procedural style since I started with PHP a few years ago, and want to give
OOP a shot. The web isn't really a good resource to learn OOP in PHP to be
honest, as a lot is outdated for PHP4's style of OOP. I've
On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 08:28 +0200, Rene Veerman wrote:
This list isn't just for programmers. It's for professionals and
beginners alike. Surely it makes sense to make the list as accessible as
possible for people?
I am somewhat still a beginner and signed up on this list about 5 days ago,
[snip]
...like any good bottom poster should
[/snip]
RTFA's, it has been discussed ad nauseum. Let's get back to PHP.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Absolutely top posting is the most efficient way of doing it! If I need to
see what the thread is all about, I have no problems starting from the bottom
and working my way up. It would be nice if everyone adopted top posting,
though. Trying to read threads where postings are at the top and
Per Jessen wrote:
Tommy Pham wrote:
(I remember a list member, not mentioning his name, does optimization
of PHP coding for just microseconds. Do you think how much more he'd
benefit from this?)
Anyone who optimizes PHP for microseconds has lost touch with reality -
or at least forgotten
I'm really stumped, it seems that although the script is running under the
time limit, if a single instruction such as exec(zip) in the first case,
or copy() in the second case are timing out, because it takes too much time
processing the big file.
Is there any configuration in php.ini (or
Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
On 03/25/2010 03:51 PM, David Lidstone wrote:
We recently para-virtualised a Xen / CentOS box which is running script
which uses fsockopen() to get a connection to an SMTP server.
Since the server changes it fails approx 50% of the time with:
Floyd Resler wrote:
Absolutely top posting is the most efficient way of doing it! If I need to
see what the thread is all about, I have no problems starting from the bottom
and working my way up. It would be nice if everyone adopted top posting,
though. Trying to read threads where
remove
Sincerely,
Michael Roberts
Executive Recruiter
Corporate Staffing Services
150 Monument Road, Suite 510
Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004
P 610-771-1084
F 610-771-0390
E mrobe...@jobscss.com
Check out my recent feature article in Professional Surveyor 12/09
edition.
On Mar 25, 2010, at 9:48 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
Floyd Resler wrote:
Absolutely top posting is the most efficient way of doing it! If I need to
see what the thread is all about, I have no problems starting from the
bottom and working my way up. It would be nice if everyone adopted top
At 6:34 PM -0700 3/24/10, Daevid Vincent wrote:
-snip-
You didn't used to be so difficult, what changed?
For me it's preferable to select windmills that are in my best
interest to tilt. Otherwise, what's the point?
Cheers,
tedd
--
---
http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com
On 25 March 2010 13:31, Bastien Helders eldroskan...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm really stumped, it seems that although the script is running under the
time limit, if a single instruction such as exec(zip) in the first case,
or copy() in the second case are timing out, because it takes too much time
I am working on a parser for logs from a spam firewall. The format is
predictable until it reaches a certain point. It then varies greatly.
There are 2 things I want to grab from this area; the size of the
message (if it exists) and the subject (if it exists)
The line might look something like
On 25 March 2010 16:42, Paul Halliday paul.halli...@gmail.com wrote:
I am working on a parser for logs from a spam firewall. The format is
predictable until it reaches a certain point. It then varies greatly.
There are 2 things I want to grab from this area; the size of the
message (if it
Paul Halliday wrote:
Is there any way to clean this up a bit?
This is what I usually do:
if ( ($matches=preg_match(linepattern1,text,match))0 )
{
// do stuff speicifc to linepattern1
}
else
if ( ($matches=preg_match(linepattern2,text,match))0 )
{
// do stuff speicifc to linepattern2
}
else
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 22:45, Nilesh Govindarajan li...@itech7.com wrote:
Bottom posting helps in users who are not participating in the thread from
the start and would like to do so.
Particularly for uniformity for archival purposes.
As has been discussed time and time again, there
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 13:40, Daniel Brown danbr...@php.net wrote:
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 22:45, Nilesh Govindarajan li...@itech7.com wrote:
Bottom posting helps in users who are not participating in the thread from
the start and would like to do so.
As has been discussed time and time
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 09:05, Parham Doustdar parha...@gmail.com wrote:
P.S.: Please, if this is off-topic, do not shout at me. I tried going to
http://news.php.net to find any rules regarding what is and isn't allowed on
the list, but found none. This is of course my shortcoming, but I
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:22:31PM -0400, tedd wrote:
At 6:34 PM -0700 3/24/10, Daevid Vincent wrote:
-snip-
You didn't used to be so difficult, what changed?
snip
Oh no, he gets testy from time to time.
Paul
--
Paul M. Foster
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To
On 03/25/2010 07:01 PM, David Lidstone wrote:
Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
On 03/25/2010 03:51 PM, David Lidstone wrote:
We recently para-virtualised a Xen / CentOS box which is running script
which uses fsockopen() to get a connection to an SMTP server.
Since the server changes it fails approx
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 3:55 AM, Per Jessen p...@computer.org wrote:
Tommy Pham wrote:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 1:46 AM, Per Jessen p...@computer.org wrote:
* If you could implement threads and run those same queries in 2+
threads, the total time saved from queries execution is 1/2 sec or
On 25 March 2010 19:37, Tommy Pham tommy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 3:55 AM, Per Jessen p...@computer.org wrote:
Tommy Pham wrote:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 1:46 AM, Per Jessen p...@computer.org wrote:
* If you could implement threads and run those same queries in 2+
threads,
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Peter Lind peter.e.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 March 2010 19:37, Tommy Pham tommy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 3:55 AM, Per Jessen p...@computer.org wrote:
Tommy Pham wrote:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 1:46 AM, Per Jessen p...@computer.org wrote:
On 25 March 2010 20:09, Tommy Pham tommy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Peter Lind peter.e.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 March 2010 19:37, Tommy Pham tommy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 3:55 AM, Per Jessen p...@computer.org wrote:
Tommy Pham wrote:
On Thu,
On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 12:09 -0700, Tommy Pham wrote:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Peter Lind peter.e.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 March 2010 19:37, Tommy Pham tommy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 3:55 AM, Per Jessen p...@computer.org wrote:
Tommy Pham wrote:
On Thu,
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Peter Lind peter.e.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 March 2010 20:09, Tommy Pham tommy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Peter Lind peter.e.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 March 2010 19:37, Tommy Pham tommy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Ashley Sheridan
a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 12:09 -0700, Tommy Pham wrote:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Peter Lind peter.e.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 March 2010 19:37, Tommy Pham tommy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 25,
On 25 March 2010 20:19, Tommy Pham tommy...@gmail.com wrote:
Aren't all feature requests must be analyzed the same way? Example,
namespace, how many of us actually uses it now when there is an
alternative solution- subfolders - that we've been using since who
knows how long. I don't know if
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Peter Lind peter.e.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 March 2010 20:19, Tommy Pham tommy...@gmail.com wrote:
Aren't all feature requests must be analyzed the same way? Example,
namespace, how many of us actually uses it now when there is an
alternative solution-
For faster dns lookup you can install dnsmasq package and make the local
server cache.
May be that'll solve your problem and the server will be faster.
Shiplu Mokaddim
My talks, http://talk.cmyweb.net
Follow me, http://twitter.com/shiplu
SUST Programmers, http://groups.google.com/group/p2psust
On 25 March 2010 20:59, Tommy Pham tommy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Peter Lind peter.e.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 March 2010 20:19, Tommy Pham tommy...@gmail.com wrote:
Aren't all feature requests must be analyzed the same way? Example,
namespace, how many of us
Tommy Pham wrote:
I'm presenting the argument for threading. Per is presenting the work
around using asynchronous queries via mysqlnd. I did read that link a
few days ago, Although the user can send multiple queries at once,
multiple queries cannot be sent over a busy connection. If a query
Peter Lind wrote:
I'm not against threads in PHP per se ... I just haven't seen a very
convincing reason for them yet, which is why I'm not very positive
about the thing.
Roughly the same here - I don't think threading belongs in PHP, but if
someone decides it's a good idea, I won't be
Tommy Pham wrote:
Here's my analysis, let's say that you have 1000 requests / second on
the web server. Each request has multiqueries which take a total of 1
second to complete. In that one second, how many of those 1000 arrive
at the same time (that one instant of micro/nano second)?
On
Hey everyone,
I have a question. If I do a mysql query that updates a column in a row
to the same value, I get 0 rows affected. However, I also get 1 or more
matched rows. Is there a way that I can return the number of matched
rows, rather than the number of rows affected?
I'm trying to get
On Mar 25, 2010, at 5:10 PM, James Colannino wrote:
Hey everyone,
I have a question. If I do a mysql query that updates a column in a row
to the same value, I get 0 rows affected. However, I also get 1 or more
matched rows. Is there a way that I can return the number of matched
rows,
Floyd Resler wrote:
As for as I know, MySQL simply just doesn't report a row as being affected if
nothing has changed in it. To get the number of matched rows, try doing a
SELECT query before you do the UPDATE query. I don't know if that will
produce the results you're looking for, but it
Per Jessen wrote:
Tommy Pham wrote:
I'm presenting the argument for threading. Per is presenting the work
around using asynchronous queries via mysqlnd. I did read that link a
few days ago, Although the user can send multiple queries at once,
multiple queries cannot be sent over a busy
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 9:19 PM, James Colannino ja...@colannino.orgwrote:
Yeah, the extra select is what I was hoping to avoid :-P The MySQL
client will return both the number of rows matched and the number of
rows affected by the query; I was hoping perhaps the PHP API offered a
way for me
On 25 March 2010 22:51, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
Per Jessen wrote:
Tommy Pham wrote:
I'm presenting the argument for threading. Per is presenting the work
around using asynchronous queries via mysqlnd. I did read that link a
few days ago, Although the user can send multiple
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Per Jessen p...@computer.org wrote:
Tommy Pham wrote:
I'm presenting the argument for threading. Per is presenting the work
around using asynchronous queries via mysqlnd. I did read that link a
few days ago, Although the user can send multiple queries at
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Tommy Pham tommy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Per Jessen p...@computer.org wrote:
Tommy Pham wrote:
I'm presenting the argument for threading. Per is presenting the work
around using asynchronous queries via mysqlnd. I did read that
?php
$dbconn = pg_connect(dbname=publisher) or die(Could not connect);
if (!pg_connection_busy($dbconn)) {
pg_send_query($dbconn, select * from authors; select count(*)
from authors;);
}
$res1 = pg_get_result($dbconn);
echo First call to pg_get_result(): $res1\n;
$rows1 =
On 25 March 2010 23:23, Tommy Pham tommy...@gmail.com wrote:
There's the code example from that same link. You may have executed
the queries asynchronously, but the process of the results are still
serial. Let's face it, all of our processing of queries are not a
simple echo. We
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Peter Lind peter.e.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 March 2010 23:23, Tommy Pham tommy...@gmail.com wrote:
There's the code example from that same link. You may have executed
the queries asynchronously, but the process of the results are still
serial. Let's face
Does anyone have any experience with authorize.net?
I have a test account with authorize.net and I have written a script to use
the checkout of authorize.net but I keep getting this error:
3|2|13|The merchant login ID or password is invalid or the account is
Hello David McGlone,
Am 2010-03-25 20:45:19, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
Does anyone have any experience with authorize.net?
Yes, I get currently per day arround 16.000 phishing
spams or something like this...
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
On Thursday 25 March 2010 21:17:38 Michelle Konzack wrote:
Hello David McGlone,
Am 2010-03-25 20:45:19, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
Does anyone have any experience with authorize.net?
Yes, I get currently per day arround 16.000 phishing
spams or something like this...
Huh? what does
-Original Message-
From: tedd [mailto:tedd.sperl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 9:23 AM
To: Daevid Vincent; php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] Top vs. Bottom Posting.
At 6:34 PM -0700 3/24/10, Daevid Vincent wrote:
-snip-
You didn't used to be so
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 08:45:19PM -0400, David McGlone wrote:
Does anyone have any experience with authorize.net?
I have a test account with authorize.net and I have written a script to use
the checkout of authorize.net but I keep getting this error:
3|2|13|The merchant login ID or
-Original Message-
From: Robert Cummings [mailto:rob...@interjinn.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 6:25 AM
To: Per Jessen
Cc: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] Will PHP ever grow up and have threading?
Per Jessen wrote:
Tommy Pham wrote:
(I remember a list
Daevid Vincent wrote:
If I have to wait 3 seconds for a page to render, that wait is noticeable.
Dumb users will click refresh, and since (unbelievably in this day and age)
PHP and mySQL don't know the user clicked 'stop' or 'refresh', and
therefore mySQL will execute the same query a second
-Original Message-
From: Robert Cummings [mailto:rob...@interjinn.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 7:16 PM
Daevid Vincent wrote:
If I have to wait 3 seconds for a page to render, that wait
is noticeable.
Dumb users will click refresh, and since (unbelievably in
this
Daevid Vincent wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Robert Cummings [mailto:rob...@interjinn.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 7:16 PM
Daevid Vincent wrote:
If I have to wait 3 seconds for a page to render, that wait
is noticeable.
Dumb users will click refresh, and since
77 matches
Mail list logo