php-general Digest 1 Apr 2010 15:00:23 -0000 Issue 6670

2010-04-01 Thread php-general-digest-help

php-general Digest 1 Apr 2010 15:00:23 - Issue 6670

Topics (messages 303714 through 303725):

Re: Still searching for a bugtracking system
303714 by: Jan G.B.

image upload keeps file name ?
303715 by: Matthew Croud
303716 by: Ashley Sheridan
303717 by: Midhun Girish

How to know which PHP is used by Apache
303718 by: Devendra Jadhav
303719 by: Ashley Sheridan
303720 by: Devendra Jadhav
303721 by: Richard
303722 by: Nilesh Govindarajan
303723 by: Teus Benschop
303724 by: Devendra Jadhav
303725 by: Devendra Jadhav

Administrivia:

To subscribe to the digest, e-mail:
php-general-digest-subscr...@lists.php.net

To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail:
php-general-digest-unsubscr...@lists.php.net

To post to the list, e-mail:
php-gene...@lists.php.net


--
---BeginMessage---
2010/3/30 Andre Polykanine an...@oire.org:
 Hello Jan,

 And what do you use then?)


Sadly, I'm bound to use what I dislike. Mantis. ;)
It's not my decision and in our business model there's no major
benefit in switching the software, at this point.
I can live with it.

Regards

 --
 With best regards from Ukraine,
 Andre
 Skype: Francophile; WlmMSN: arthaelon @ yandex.ru; Jabber: arthaelon @ 
 jabber.org
 Yahoo! messenger: andre.polykanine; ICQ: 191749952
 Twitter: m_elensule

 - Original message -
 From: Jan G.B. ro0ot.w...@googlemail.com
 To: Alex Major p...@allydm.co.uk
 Date: Tuesday, March 30, 2010, 6:04:20 PM
 Subject: [PHP] Still searching for a bugtracking system

 2010/3/30 Alex Major p...@allydm.co.uk

 Surely if it's not suitable for your situation, it's not the best? :)

 Mantis is what I'd recommend and believe has already been recommend to you.
 Runs using PHP and MySQL, it's flexible for public or private projects,
 multiple projects etc.

 I do agree with you that Bugzilla seems heavy, I know it has its supporters
 but I've always found it to be overkill for the projects I've worked on.

 Alex.

 -Original Message-
 From: Andre Polykanine [mailto:an...@oire.org]
 Sent: 30 March 2010 14:14
 To: php-gene...@lists.php.net
 Subject: [PHP] Still searching for a bugtracking system

 Hello everyone,
 The best of all suggested bugtrackers is JotBug, on my opinion. But it
 works only with SQLite databases, and I have no access to such one
 (only MySql).
 Any solutions?
 P.S. I'd use Trac, but since I have no own server yet, we have no
 access to Python, either... Only Php, MySql, Perl.
 I have looked at Bugzilla... seems to heavy for our service).

 -

 Well. I'm not a fan of mantis. Mantis has some annoying bugs and the
 codebase seems weird.
 It basically works, but that is all about it.


 I quote http://sqlite.org/about.html :

 SQLite is a software library that implements 
a self-contained,serverless, zero-configuration, transactional SQL database 
engine.
 ...
 Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server 
 process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete 
 SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is 
 contained in a single disk file.

 So you don't need access to such a database.


 Regards

 --
 PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
 To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---

Hi Guys,

Can someone confirm for me that the code below will move an uploaded  
file and give it the same name as the original image file name ?



$file_dir = /home/uploads;
foreach($_FILES as $file_name = $file_array) {
echo path: .$file_array[tmp_name].br/\n;
echo name: .$file_array[name].br/\n;
echo type: .$file_array[type].br/\n;
echo size: .$file_array[size].br/\n;

$UploadName[$num] = $file_array[name];
$num++;

if (is_uploaded_file($file_array[tmp_name])) {
		move_uploaded_file($file_array[tmp_name], $file_dir/. 
$file_array[name]) or die (Couldn't copy);

echo file was moved!br/;
}
}



Many thanks,




---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 10:51 +0100, Matthew Croud wrote:

 Hi Guys,
 
 Can someone confirm for me that the code below will move an uploaded  
 file and give it the same name as the original image file name ?
 
 
 $file_dir = /home/uploads;
 foreach($_FILES as $file_name = $file_array) {
   echo path: .$file_array[tmp_name].br/\n;
   echo name: .$file_array[name].br/\n;
   echo type: .$file_array[type].br/\n;
   echo size: .$file_array[size].br/\n;
   
   $UploadName[$num] = $file_array[name];
  $num++;
 
   if (is_uploaded_file($file_array[tmp_name])) {
   move_uploaded_file($file_array[tmp_name], $file_dir/. 
 $file_array[name]) or die (Couldn't copy);
   echo file was moved!br/;
   }
 }
 
 
 
 Many thanks,
 
 
 
 
 


Yes, 

Re: Re[2]: [PHP] Still searching for a bugtracking system

2010-04-01 Thread Jan G.B.
2010/3/30 Andre Polykanine an...@oire.org:
 Hello Jan,

 And what do you use then?)


Sadly, I'm bound to use what I dislike. Mantis. ;)
It's not my decision and in our business model there's no major
benefit in switching the software, at this point.
I can live with it.

Regards

 --
 With best regards from Ukraine,
 Andre
 Skype: Francophile; WlmMSN: arthaelon @ yandex.ru; Jabber: arthaelon @ 
 jabber.org
 Yahoo! messenger: andre.polykanine; ICQ: 191749952
 Twitter: m_elensule

 - Original message -
 From: Jan G.B. ro0ot.w...@googlemail.com
 To: Alex Major p...@allydm.co.uk
 Date: Tuesday, March 30, 2010, 6:04:20 PM
 Subject: [PHP] Still searching for a bugtracking system

 2010/3/30 Alex Major p...@allydm.co.uk

 Surely if it's not suitable for your situation, it's not the best? :)

 Mantis is what I'd recommend and believe has already been recommend to you.
 Runs using PHP and MySQL, it's flexible for public or private projects,
 multiple projects etc.

 I do agree with you that Bugzilla seems heavy, I know it has its supporters
 but I've always found it to be overkill for the projects I've worked on.

 Alex.

 -Original Message-
 From: Andre Polykanine [mailto:an...@oire.org]
 Sent: 30 March 2010 14:14
 To: php-general@lists.php.net
 Subject: [PHP] Still searching for a bugtracking system

 Hello everyone,
 The best of all suggested bugtrackers is JotBug, on my opinion. But it
 works only with SQLite databases, and I have no access to such one
 (only MySql).
 Any solutions?
 P.S. I'd use Trac, but since I have no own server yet, we have no
 access to Python, either... Only Php, MySql, Perl.
 I have looked at Bugzilla... seems to heavy for our service).

 -

 Well. I'm not a fan of mantis. Mantis has some annoying bugs and the
 codebase seems weird.
 It basically works, but that is all about it.


 I quote http://sqlite.org/about.html :

 SQLite is a software library that implements 
a self-contained,serverless, zero-configuration, transactional SQL database 
engine.
 ...
 Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server 
 process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete 
 SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is 
 contained in a single disk file.

 So you don't need access to such a database.


 Regards

 --
 PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
 To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



[PHP] image upload keeps file name ?

2010-04-01 Thread Matthew Croud

Hi Guys,

Can someone confirm for me that the code below will move an uploaded  
file and give it the same name as the original image file name ?



$file_dir = /home/uploads;
foreach($_FILES as $file_name = $file_array) {
echo path: .$file_array[tmp_name].br/\n;
echo name: .$file_array[name].br/\n;
echo type: .$file_array[type].br/\n;
echo size: .$file_array[size].br/\n;

$UploadName[$num] = $file_array[name];
$num++;

if (is_uploaded_file($file_array[tmp_name])) {
		move_uploaded_file($file_array[tmp_name], $file_dir/. 
$file_array[name]) or die (Couldn't copy);

echo file was moved!br/;
}
}



Many thanks,





--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] image upload keeps file name ?

2010-04-01 Thread Ashley Sheridan
On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 10:51 +0100, Matthew Croud wrote:

 Hi Guys,
 
 Can someone confirm for me that the code below will move an uploaded  
 file and give it the same name as the original image file name ?
 
 
 $file_dir = /home/uploads;
 foreach($_FILES as $file_name = $file_array) {
   echo path: .$file_array[tmp_name].br/\n;
   echo name: .$file_array[name].br/\n;
   echo type: .$file_array[type].br/\n;
   echo size: .$file_array[size].br/\n;
   
   $UploadName[$num] = $file_array[name];
  $num++;
 
   if (is_uploaded_file($file_array[tmp_name])) {
   move_uploaded_file($file_array[tmp_name], $file_dir/. 
 $file_array[name]) or die (Couldn't copy);
   echo file was moved!br/;
   }
 }
 
 
 
 Many thanks,
 
 
 
 
 


Yes, the original filename comes from the [name] array element.
However, if someone is uploading a filename with the same name as one
that already exists, you will be overwriting it.

For peace of mind, I've always found it best to save the file using the
tmp_name given to it by PHP, and store this against the original
filename in a database. You can then use PHP to deliver the file back to
the user when it's needed as either a download or something displayed in
the browser. This works nicely with storing files outside of the web
root, which will prevent people from maliciously uploading files to
attempt to break your server and/or app.

Thanks,
Ash
http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk




Re: [PHP] image upload keeps file name ?

2010-04-01 Thread Midhun Girish
  I use the follwing function for moving files:


public function moveFile($file,$targetdir=../uploads/images/)
  {
$fileName = $file['name'];
$ext = substr($fileName, strrpos($fileName, '.') + 1);
do
{

$targetfilename=md5(date(m.d.y.h.i.s).basename($fileName)).'.'.$ext;
  $fullname=$targetdir.$targetfilename;
}while(file_exists($fullname));
move_uploaded_file($file[tmp_name],$fullname);
return $fullname;
  }


Call the fn as :

foreach($_FILES as $file_name = $filearray)
{
if( $filearray['error']=='')
{
   $filenametobestored=moveFile($filearray);
   /*Enter name into db here*/
}
}


this will make sure you never over write anyfiles..


Midhun Girish

On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Ashley Sheridan 
a...@ashleysheridan.co.ukwrote:

 of the web
 root, which will prevent people from maliciously uploadi



[PHP] How to know which PHP is used by Apache

2010-04-01 Thread Devendra Jadhav
Hi All,

In the situation if there are two PHP's installed on the Linux box.
How to know which PHP is used by Apache?

Another question is do Apache need PHP's binary to execute PHP Scripts? If
yes what is the role of libphp5.so in Apache?

Note: PHP is configured as module under Apache.

Appreciate your thoughts.

-- 
Devendra Jadhav
देवेंद्र जाधव


Re: [PHP] How to know which PHP is used by Apache

2010-04-01 Thread Ashley Sheridan
On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 19:00 +0530, Devendra Jadhav wrote:

 Hi All,
 
 In the situation if there are two PHP's installed on the Linux box.
 How to know which PHP is used by Apache?
 
 Another question is do Apache need PHP's binary to execute PHP Scripts? If
 yes what is the role of libphp5.so in Apache?
 
 Note: PHP is configured as module under Apache.
 
 Appreciate your thoughts.
 


The libphp5.so is the Apache module that links PHP into Apache. You need
this and PHP installed if you want to use PHP in Apache.

The module itself indicates what version of PHP Apache will be using.

Thanks,
Ash
http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk




Re: [PHP] How to know which PHP is used by Apache

2010-04-01 Thread Devendra Jadhav
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Ashley Sheridan 
a...@ashleysheridan.co.ukwrote:

  On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 19:00 +0530, Devendra Jadhav wrote:

 Hi All,

 In the situation if there are two PHP's installed on the Linux box.
 How to know which PHP is used by Apache?

 Another question is do Apache need PHP's binary to execute PHP Scripts? If
 yes what is the role of libphp5.so in Apache?

 Note: PHP is configured as module under Apache.

 Appreciate your thoughts.



 The libphp5.so is the Apache module that links PHP into Apache. You need
 this and PHP installed if you want to use PHP in Apache.

 The module itself indicates what version of PHP Apache will be using.

   Thanks,
 Ash
 http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk



With my case both installation of PHP has version 5.x, so how to know which
PHP is being used?

-- 
Devendra Jadhav
देवेंद्र जाधव


Re: [PHP] How to know which PHP is used by Apache

2010-04-01 Thread Richard
Hi,

 In the situation if there are two PHP's installed on the Linux box.
 How to know which PHP is used by Apache?

 Another question is do Apache need PHP's binary to execute PHP Scripts? If
 yes what is the role of libphp5.so in Apache?

 Note: PHP is configured as module under Apache.

This may help:

?php
phpinfo();
?

-- 
Richard Heyes
HTML5 canvas graphing: RGraph - http://www.rgraph.net (updated 20th March)
Lots of PHP and Javascript code - http://www.phpguru.org

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] How to know which PHP is used by Apache

2010-04-01 Thread Nilesh Govindarajan

On 04/01/10 19:00, Devendra Jadhav wrote:

Hi All,

In the situation if there are two PHP's installed on the Linux box.
How to know which PHP is used by Apache?

Another question is do Apache need PHP's binary to execute PHP Scripts? If
yes what is the role of libphp5.so in Apache?

Note: PHP is configured as module under Apache.

Appreciate your thoughts.



First of all, libphp5.so is created during the php compilation process. 
So it will use version of php with which it was compiled.


Also, I don't think php's binary is needed for execution of php scripts 
is needed.


--
Nilesh Govindarajan
Site  Server Administrator
www.itech7.com
मेरा भारत महान !
मम भारत: महत्तम भवतु !

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] How to know which PHP is used by Apache

2010-04-01 Thread Teus Benschop
On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 19:07 +0530, Devendra Jadhav wrote:
 With my case both installation of PHP has version 5.x, so how to know which
 PHP is being used?
 
Running this page through Apache could do it:

?php
phpinfo ();
?

Teus.


--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] How to know which PHP is used by Apache

2010-04-01 Thread Devendra Jadhav
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Teus Benschop teusjanne...@gmail.comwrote:

 On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 19:07 +0530, Devendra Jadhav wrote:
  With my case both installation of PHP has version 5.x, so how to know
 which
  PHP is being used?
 
 Running this page through Apache could do it:

 ?php
 phpinfo ();
 ?

 Teus.


 --
 PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
 To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php


I am still confused. As per Nilesh php's binary is not required and as per
Ashley it is required.
Which one is correct?
And I am not able to find which php's binary is used by using phpinfo().



-- 
Devendra Jadhav
देवेंद्र जाधव


Re: [PHP] How to know which PHP is used by Apache

2010-04-01 Thread Devendra Jadhav
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Devendra Jadhav devendra...@gmail.comwrote:

 On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Teus Benschop teusjanne...@gmail.comwrote:

 On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 19:07 +0530, Devendra Jadhav wrote:
  With my case both installation of PHP has version 5.x, so how to know
 which
  PHP is being used?
 
 Running this page through Apache could do it:

 ?php
 phpinfo ();
 ?

 Teus.


 --
 PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
 To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php


 I am still confused. As per Nilesh php's binary is not required and as per
 Ashley it is required.
 Which one is correct?
 And I am not able to find which php's binary is used by using phpinfo().




 --
 Devendra Jadhav
 देवेंद्र जाधव


Anyone confident about either of the two answers?


-- 
Devendra Jadhav
देवेंद्र जाधव


Re: [PHP] How to know which PHP is used by Apache

2010-04-01 Thread Nilesh Govindarajan

On 04/01/10 20:30, Devendra Jadhav wrote:

On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Devendra Jadhavdevendra...@gmail.comwrote:


On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Teus Benschopteusjanne...@gmail.comwrote:


On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 19:07 +0530, Devendra Jadhav wrote:

With my case both installation of PHP has version 5.x, so how to know

which

PHP is being used?


Running this page through Apache could do it:

?php
phpinfo ();
?

Teus.


--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



I am still confused. As per Nilesh php's binary is not required and as per
Ashley it is required.
Which one is correct?
And I am not able to find which php's binary is used by using phpinfo().




--
Devendra Jadhav
देवेंद्र जाधव



Anyone confident about either of the two answers?




Well, you can do a trial test. Compile a different version of php 
without libphp5.so, and replace the php interpreter of libphp5.so with 
this one.


If phpinfo() from apache shows you a different version then libphp5 uses 
the binary else not.


As per common logic, libphp5 embeds the php interpreter into apache, 
hence it'd not make sense to say that it needs the binary.


--
Nilesh Govindarajan
Site  Server Administrator
www.itech7.com
मेरा भारत महान !
मम भारत: महत्तम भवतु !

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



[PHP] Re: php 5.3.2 Unable to fork

2010-04-01 Thread Eduardo Nunes
Hi, thanks for the reply, just tried without any db bases and the scenario 
did not change (besides for mysql).

With and without pear.. nothing changed from the initial scene.


Nathan Rixham nrix...@gmail.com escreveu na mensagem 
news:4bb3eb75.4020...@gmail.com...

Eduardo Nunes wrote:

Compiling without mysql support, the cli php -r 'echo shell_exec(echo
Test!);' works fine even as the apache unprivileged user. However when
running the test.php script with apache the error log still shows the
error Unable to execute / Unable to fork ...


back in 5.2.3 i had the same problem and found it to be the psql drivers
not mysql.. may be worth checking 



--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] How to know which PHP is used by Apache

2010-04-01 Thread Kevin Kinsey

Devendra Jadhav wrote:



I am still confused. As per Nilesh php's binary is not required and as per
Ashley it is required.
Which one is correct?
And I am not able to find which php's binary is used by using phpinfo().


Anyone confident about either of the two answers?


Pretty confident about all of them.  Nilesh probably misunderstood,
or we are misunderstanding him.  PHP has to have a binary file,
whether it's the CLI interpreter or the Apache module.

Run a script with phpinfo() in it.  Look for the line that says
Server API.  If this reads something like Apache $N.$N Handler,
then the PHP interpreter binary is something like libphp$n.so.
If the line reads Command Line Interface, then you are using
something like /usr/bin/php, /usr/local/bin/php, etc. (I'm from
a BSD background, your $penguin_path may vary).

If you are talking about actually having two different versions
of PHP installed, and not sure which is actually being called,
you might find out something with the Linux equivalent of the
BSD `pkg_which`:

[31] Thu 01.Apr.2010 10:39:24
[ad...@archangel][/usr/local/bin]
sudo pkg_which /usr/local/bin/php
php5-5.2.11

This command is highly dependent on your Linux distro:  on
RH I think it's rpm, dpkg on Debian, urpmf on Mandriva,
etc.

If you have two installations of the same version, $deity
help you :-)

HTH,

Kevin Kinsey

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] Re: php 5.3.2 Unable to fork

2010-04-01 Thread Eduardo Nunes


I would try your setenv path idea while compiling php without mysql, however 
I don't get why compiling php with mysql does not fork nor execute even 
running the php cli as root...


Thanks for the reply Nilesh!

Nilesh Govindarajan li...@itech7.com escreveu na mensagem 
news:4bb3fca7.4030...@itech7.com...

On 04/01/10 02:21, Eduardo Nunes wrote:

Compiling without mysql support, the cli php -r 'echo shell_exec(echo
Test!);' works fine even as the apache unprivileged user. However when
running the test.php script with apache the error log still shows the
error Unable to execute / Unable to fork ...


Eduardo Nunes zeh...@terra.com.br escreveu na mensagem
news:38.94.09265.3a973...@pb1.pair.com...

Hello people!

A time before I had issues with my php 5.2.3 that would not fork
anything, neither in shell or via apache, and I figured out that
commenting out the snmp.so extension from php.ini made it fork
commands passed to php cli with an unprivileged user (www) fine,
however apache still would not fork anything.

Now I just compiled 5.3.2 and it doesn't fork at all, neither as root
with -n option.

For example I am running:
r...@saturno:/usr/src/apache/php-5.3.2# ./sapi/cli/php -n -r 'echo
shell_exec(echo Test!);'
Warning: shell_exec(): Unable to execute 'echo Test!' in Command line
code on line 1

(neither system, exec, other options work)

Any ideas on what is going on?

(compiled using ../configure --prefix=/usr --with-apxs2 --disable-cgi
--disable-short-tags --disable-ipv6 --without-sqlite3 --with-mysql
--with-pdo-mysql --without-pdo-sqlite --enable-sockets
--without-sqlite --with-gnu-ld)

Thanks





I think you need to check your PATH environment variable. Add the 
directory to it where your PHP interpreter sits.


PS: This just a guess. Don't bash me if I'm wrong.

--
Nilesh Govindarajan
Site  Server Administrator
www.itech7.com
मेरा भारत महान !
मम भारत: महत्तम भवतु ! 



--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] How to know which PHP is used by Apache

2010-04-01 Thread Nilesh Govindarajan

libphp5.so doesn't need the php binary.

I've confirmed this using a test.

My local apache is configured to use libphp5.so

I moved /usr/bin/php to /root, then started apache and ran drupal. It 
worked.


This confirms that libphp5.so is independent of the php binary in 
/usr/bin as I suggested earlier.


--
Nilesh Govindarajan
Site  Server Administrator
www.itech7.com
मेरा भारत महान !
मम भारत: महत्तम भवतु !

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] How to know which PHP is used by Apache

2010-04-01 Thread Kevin Kinsey

Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:

libphp5.so doesn't need the php binary.


You're right, and of course not.  libphp5.so
*is* a PHP binary  :-)


I've confirmed this using a test.

My local apache is configured to use libphp5.so

I moved /usr/bin/php to /root, then started apache and ran drupal. It 
worked.


This confirms that libphp5.so is independent of the php binary in 
/usr/bin as I suggested earlier.


No one was questioning that .. or at least, I wasn't.
One is an executable binary file ... a program.

The other is also a binary file, but it's a _library_.

What I said was you need one or the other.  A binary
file, either the Apache SO or the binary interpreter...

It's possible to configure Apache to use a PHP executable
(CGI), and the CGI and CLI executables are similar, if
not identical.

I dunno if anyone actually does that anymore, though.  :-)

Ashley said The libphp5.so is the Apache module that
links PHP into Apache. You need this and PHP installed
if you want to use PHP in Apache.  Devendra apparently
misinterpreted this to mean that you need both the SO and
the binary interpreter, but you don't.  You DO need the
rest of the PHP extensions, libraries, config files, etc.
 ... a PHP installation, whether or not your have the
CLI binary is not that important, although I always do
since I like to run system scripts in PHP via cron, etc.

Kevin Kinsey

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] How to know which PHP is used by Apache

2010-04-01 Thread Nilesh Govindarajan

On 04/01/10 23:03, Kevin Kinsey wrote:

Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:

libphp5.so doesn't need the php binary.


You're right, and of course not. libphp5.so
*is* a PHP binary :-)


I've confirmed this using a test.

My local apache is configured to use libphp5.so

I moved /usr/bin/php to /root, then started apache and ran drupal. It
worked.

This confirms that libphp5.so is independent of the php binary in
/usr/bin as I suggested earlier.


No one was questioning that .. or at least, I wasn't.
One is an executable binary file ... a program.

The other is also a binary file, but it's a _library_.

What I said was you need one or the other. A binary
file, either the Apache SO or the binary interpreter...

It's possible to configure Apache to use a PHP executable
(CGI), and the CGI and CLI executables are similar, if
not identical.

I dunno if anyone actually does that anymore, though. :-)

Ashley said The libphp5.so is the Apache module that
links PHP into Apache. You need this and PHP installed
if you want to use PHP in Apache. Devendra apparently
misinterpreted this to mean that you need both the SO and
the binary interpreter, but you don't. You DO need the
rest of the PHP extensions, libraries, config files, etc.
... a PHP installation, whether or not your have the
CLI binary is not that important, although I always do
since I like to run system scripts in PHP via cron, etc.

Kevin Kinsey


LOL. Super misunderstanding. Anyway, I did that test to help Devendra.

--
Nilesh Govindarajan
Site  Server Administrator
www.itech7.com
मेरा भारत महान !
मम भारत: महत्तम भवतु !

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



[PHP] File encryption under PHP

2010-04-01 Thread Paul M Foster
Folks:

If I wanted to encrypt a file in PHP and then write it out to disk
(one-way encryption, requiring a password), what PHP built-ins might you
recommend to encrypt the contents of the file before writing it out to
disk?

Paul

-- 
Paul M. Foster

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] File encryption under PHP

2010-04-01 Thread Ashley Sheridan
On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 15:47 -0400, Paul M Foster wrote:

 Folks:
 
 If I wanted to encrypt a file in PHP and then write it out to disk
 (one-way encryption, requiring a password), what PHP built-ins might you
 recommend to encrypt the contents of the file before writing it out to
 disk?
 
 Paul
 
 -- 
 Paul M. Foster
 


I don't think you want one-way encryption, that would mean you can't
unencrypt it!

What about the usual functions for encrypting strings in PHP? Couldn't
you encrypt the file as a string and output that? Or did you want the
file to request a password when it was opened? What about a
password-protected compressed archive file?

Thanks,
Ash
http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk




Re: [PHP] File encryption under PHP

2010-04-01 Thread Paul M Foster
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 08:45:53PM +0100, Ashley Sheridan wrote:

 On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 15:47 -0400, Paul M Foster wrote:
 
 Folks:
 
 If I wanted to encrypt a file in PHP and then write it out to disk
 (one-way encryption, requiring a password), what PHP built-ins might you
 recommend to encrypt the contents of the file before writing it out to
 disk?
 
 Paul
 
 --
 Paul M. Foster
 
 
 
 I don't think you want one-way encryption, that would mean you can't unencrypt
 it!

Then one-way encryption would be something no one would do. I must be
using the wrong term. What I mean is that it needs a password, which is
used to encrypt and decrypt the file.

 
 What about the usual functions for encrypting strings in PHP? Couldn't you
 encrypt the file as a string and output that? Or did you want the file to
 request a password when it was opened? What about a password-protected
 compressed archive file?

Well, when you say, usual functions for encrypting strings in PHP,
what are my options there? And which are the best (most secure) methods?
It looks like mcrypt_*() will do the job, but there are 20-30
algorithms, and I have no idea which are the most secure. Or would
something else be better (than mcrypt_*())?

Paul

-- 
Paul M. Foster

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] File encryption under PHP

2010-04-01 Thread APseudoUtopia
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Paul M Foster pa...@quillandmouse.com wrote:
 Folks:

 If I wanted to encrypt a file in PHP and then write it out to disk
 (one-way encryption, requiring a password), what PHP built-ins might you
 recommend to encrypt the contents of the file before writing it out to
 disk?

 Paul


I use the MCrypt extension to encrypt strings (login hashes in
cookies, other such things). I don't see why you couldn't read the
file into a string and then use mcrypt. You'd have to play with it
though. Like make sure performance doesn't degrade massively for large
files (rather than small strings), as well as making sure everything
is binary-safe.

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] File encryption under PHP

2010-04-01 Thread Ashley Sheridan
On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 16:04 -0400, Paul M Foster wrote:

 On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 08:45:53PM +0100, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
 
  On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 15:47 -0400, Paul M Foster wrote:
  
  Folks:
  
  If I wanted to encrypt a file in PHP and then write it out to disk
  (one-way encryption, requiring a password), what PHP built-ins might you
  recommend to encrypt the contents of the file before writing it out to
  disk?
  
  Paul
  
  --
  Paul M. Foster
  
  
  
  I don't think you want one-way encryption, that would mean you can't 
  unencrypt
  it!
 
 Then one-way encryption would be something no one would do. I must be
 using the wrong term. What I mean is that it needs a password, which is
 used to encrypt and decrypt the file.
 
  
  What about the usual functions for encrypting strings in PHP? Couldn't you
  encrypt the file as a string and output that? Or did you want the file to
  request a password when it was opened? What about a password-protected
  compressed archive file?
 
 Well, when you say, usual functions for encrypting strings in PHP,
 what are my options there? And which are the best (most secure) methods?
 It looks like mcrypt_*() will do the job, but there are 20-30
 algorithms, and I have no idea which are the most secure. Or would
 something else be better (than mcrypt_*())?
 
 Paul
 
 -- 
 Paul M. Foster
 


There's a good reason for one-way encryption. The crypt function in PHP
is one-way, and the use case is to compare an entered password without
the encrypted password ever being unencryptable.

Thanks,
Ash
http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk




Re: [PHP] File encryption under PHP

2010-04-01 Thread APseudoUtopia
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Ashley Sheridan
a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk wrote:
 On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 16:04 -0400, Paul M Foster wrote:

 On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 08:45:53PM +0100, Ashley Sheridan wrote:

  On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 15:47 -0400, Paul M Foster wrote:
 
      Folks:
 
      If I wanted to encrypt a file in PHP and then write it out to disk
      (one-way encryption, requiring a password), what PHP built-ins might 
  you
      recommend to encrypt the contents of the file before writing it out to
      disk?
 
      Paul
 
      --
      Paul M. Foster
 
 
 
  I don't think you want one-way encryption, that would mean you can't 
  unencrypt
  it!

 Then one-way encryption would be something no one would do. I must be
 using the wrong term. What I mean is that it needs a password, which is
 used to encrypt and decrypt the file.

 
  What about the usual functions for encrypting strings in PHP? Couldn't you
  encrypt the file as a string and output that? Or did you want the file to
  request a password when it was opened? What about a password-protected
  compressed archive file?

 Well, when you say, usual functions for encrypting strings in PHP,
 what are my options there? And which are the best (most secure) methods?
 It looks like mcrypt_*() will do the job, but there are 20-30
 algorithms, and I have no idea which are the most secure. Or would
 something else be better (than mcrypt_*())?

 Paul

 --
 Paul M. Foster



 There's a good reason for one-way encryption. The crypt function in PHP
 is one-way, and the use case is to compare an entered password without
 the encrypted password ever being unencryptable.

 Thanks,
 Ash

Technically, one-way encryption is called hashing, as encryption by
definition is two-way.

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] File encryption under PHP

2010-04-01 Thread Kevin Kinsey

Paul M Foster wrote:

Folks:

If I wanted to encrypt a file in PHP and then write it out to disk
(one-way encryption, requiring a password), what PHP built-ins might you
recommend to encrypt the contents of the file before writing it out to
disk?

Paul


Here's a very generic mcrypt example.  IANAE
where security is concerned, but from what I've
read, BLOWFISH should be a fairly decent algorithm
for most applications.  This isn't my work, can't
remember whose ... uses 3DES.

KDK


?php
$plaintext = Four score and seven years ago;
$cipher = MCRYPT_TRIPLEDES;
$mode = MCRYPT_MODE_ECB;
$rand_src = MCRYPT_DEV_RANDOM; //MCRYPT_DEV_RANDOM
$password = 'Extra secret password';

print (Plaintext: $plaintext\n);

// OK, let's encrypt the data
$handle = mcrypt_module_open ($cipher, '', $mode, '');
if (!$handle)
die (Couldn't locate open mcrypt module for '$cipher' algorithm);
$iv_size = mcrypt_enc_get_iv_size ($handle);
$ivector = mcrypt_create_iv ($iv_size, $rand_src);
if (mcrypt_generic_init ($handle, $password, $ivector) == -1)
die (Error: mcrypt_generic_init() failed.);
$ciphertext = mcrypt_generic ($handle, $plaintext);
mcrypt_generic_end ($handle);

echo br Ciphertext:  . bin2hex ($ciphertext) . \n;

// Now let's decrypt it
$handle = mcrypt_module_open ($cipher, '', $mode, '');
if (!$handle) die (Couldn't locate open mcrypt module for '$cipher' 
algorithm);

if (mcrypt_generic_init ($handle, $password, $ivector) == -1)
   die (Error: mcrypt_generic_init() failed.);
$plaintext = mdecrypt_generic ($handle, $ciphertext);
mcrypt_generic_end ($handle);

echo br Plaintext: $plaintext\n);
?

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



[PHP] Tokutek Acquires Oracle

2010-04-01 Thread Daevid Vincent
http://tokutek.com/2010/04/tokutek-acquires-oracle/

April 1, 2010, Totutek, Inc., announced the acquisition of Oracle
Corporation. Tokutek has long been a supporter of open-source software
said John Partridge, CEO of Tokutek. Oracle is an innovative small company
the develops database front ends such as MySQL. Tokutek intends to continue
developing the MySQL technology and expand our commitment to open-soure
software. Oracle CEO Larry Ellison's role has not been determined. Other
than a statement that the transaction is an all-stock transaction, terms of
the transaction were not disclosed.

http://planet.mysql.com/


-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



[PHP] Re: Tokutek Acquires Oracle

2010-04-01 Thread Nathan Rixham
Daevid Vincent wrote:
 http://tokutek.com/2010/04/tokutek-acquires-oracle/
 
 April 1, 2010, Totutek, Inc., announced the acquisition of Oracle
 Corporation. Tokutek has long been a supporter of open-source software
 said John Partridge, CEO of Tokutek. Oracle is an innovative small company
 the develops database front ends such as MySQL. Tokutek intends to continue
 developing the MySQL technology and expand our commitment to open-soure
 software. Oracle CEO Larry Ellison's role has not been determined. Other
 than a statement that the transaction is an all-stock transaction, terms of
 the transaction were not disclosed.
 
 http://planet.mysql.com/
 

but sadly..

Tokutek's acquisitions of Oracle, Apple, HP, Microsoft and Google were
today blocked by the European Union on the basis that the announced
acquisitions were 'in bad taste'. 

http://tokutek.com/2010/04/tokuteks-acquisitions-blocked-by-eu/

shame

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] Re: Tokutek Acquires Oracle

2010-04-01 Thread Ashley Sheridan
On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 21:58 +0100, Nathan Rixham wrote:

 Daevid Vincent wrote:
  http://tokutek.com/2010/04/tokutek-acquires-oracle/
  
  April 1, 2010, Totutek, Inc., announced the acquisition of Oracle
  Corporation. Tokutek has long been a supporter of open-source software
  said John Partridge, CEO of Tokutek. Oracle is an innovative small company
  the develops database front ends such as MySQL. Tokutek intends to continue
  developing the MySQL technology and expand our commitment to open-soure
  software. Oracle CEO Larry Ellison's role has not been determined. Other
  than a statement that the transaction is an all-stock transaction, terms of
  the transaction were not disclosed.
  
  http://planet.mysql.com/
  
 
 but sadly..
 
 Tokutek's acquisitions of Oracle, Apple, HP, Microsoft and Google were
 today blocked by the European Union on the basis that the announced
 acquisitions were 'in bad taste'. 
 
 http://tokutek.com/2010/04/tokuteks-acquisitions-blocked-by-eu/
 
 shame
 


An April fools? It looks decidedly odd...

Speaking of which, has anyone checked out Googles new Animal
Translate? :p

Thanks,
Ash
http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk




Re: [PHP] Re: Tokutek Acquires Oracle

2010-04-01 Thread Tommy Pham
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Ashley Sheridan
a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk wrote:
 On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 21:58 +0100, Nathan Rixham wrote:

 Daevid Vincent wrote:
  http://tokutek.com/2010/04/tokutek-acquires-oracle/
 
  April 1, 2010, Totutek, Inc., announced the acquisition of Oracle
  Corporation. Tokutek has long been a supporter of open-source software
  said John Partridge, CEO of Tokutek. Oracle is an innovative small company
  the develops database front ends such as MySQL. Tokutek intends to continue
  developing the MySQL technology and expand our commitment to open-soure
  software. Oracle CEO Larry Ellison's role has not been determined. Other
  than a statement that the transaction is an all-stock transaction, terms of
  the transaction were not disclosed.
 
  http://planet.mysql.com/
 

 but sadly..

 Tokutek's acquisitions of Oracle, Apple, HP, Microsoft and Google were
 today blocked by the European Union on the basis that the announced
 acquisitions were 'in bad taste'. 

 http://tokutek.com/2010/04/tokuteks-acquisitions-blocked-by-eu/

 shame



 An April fools? It looks decidedly odd...

 Speaking of which, has anyone checked out Googles new Animal
 Translate? :p


BTW, did you know that laptop can fly?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVwhrJirgp0

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] File encryption under PHP

2010-04-01 Thread Adam Richardson

 Then one-way encryption would be something no one would do. I must be using
 the wrong term. What I mean is that it needs a password, which is used to
 encrypt and decrypt the file.


*Symmetric* encryption uses the same key to encrypt and decrypt the text
(what you're talking about, and example algorithms include blowfish, AES.)

*Asymmetric* encryption uses separate keys, allowing anyone to send you an
encrypted message with a public key, but only allowing you to decrypt it
with your private key (https uses this as the initial stage to exchange the
key to be used for the subsequent exchanges of text using symmetric
encryption because symmetric encryption is much faster, and example
algorithm is RSA.)

Adam

-- 
Nephtali:  PHP web framework that functions beautifully
http://nephtaliproject.com


[PHP] Apache rule/directive to stop serving PHP pages from /var/www/includes/

2010-04-01 Thread Daevid Vincent
(Sorry if this is a duplicate. I sent one earlier with OT: prefixing the
subject line and I think this list software kills the message despite being
proper netiquette. *sigh*)

I have your basic web tree setup.
 
develo...@mypse:/var/www/dart2$ tree -d -I 'CVS'
|-- UPDATES
|-- ajax
|-- images
|   |-- gui
|   `-- icons
`-- includes
|-- classes
|-- css
|-- functions
|   `-- xml
|-- gui
|-- js
|   |-- charts
`-- pear
|-- Auth
|-- Benchmark
|-- DB
|-- Date
|-- File
|-- Spreadsheet
`-- XML_RPC
 
It's not ideal. I would normally have /includes/ in a directory outside the
servable webroot directory, but for various reasons I won't go into, this
is how it is.

Now I have Apache configured to NOT allow directory browsing.

I also have a index.html file in most all main directories to log attempts
and also redirect back to the main site.

What I don't know how to protect against is if someone were to KNOW the
name of a .php file. Say I have /includes/foo.inc.php for example, someone
can put that in their URL and apache will happily serve it up. :(

Is there a directive to prevent this?

I would think it should be doable since PHP reads the file directly off of
disk via a command like this and isn't really served perse:

require_once ROOTPATH.'/includes/functions/foo.inc.php';

Anyone? Anyone? Beuller? Beuller?


-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] Apache rule/directive to stop serving PHP pages from /var/www/includes/

2010-04-01 Thread Robert Cummings

Daevid Vincent wrote:

(Sorry if this is a duplicate. I sent one earlier with OT: prefixing the
subject line and I think this list software kills the message despite being
proper netiquette. *sigh*)

I have your basic web tree setup.
 
develo...@mypse:/var/www/dart2$ tree -d -I 'CVS'

|-- UPDATES
|-- ajax
|-- images
|   |-- gui
|   `-- icons
`-- includes
|-- classes
|-- css
|-- functions
|   `-- xml
|-- gui
|-- js
|   |-- charts
`-- pear
|-- Auth
|-- Benchmark
|-- DB
|-- Date
|-- File
|-- Spreadsheet
`-- XML_RPC
 
It's not ideal. I would normally have /includes/ in a directory outside the

servable webroot directory, but for various reasons I won't go into, this
is how it is.

Now I have Apache configured to NOT allow directory browsing.

I also have a index.html file in most all main directories to log attempts
and also redirect back to the main site.

What I don't know how to protect against is if someone were to KNOW the
name of a .php file. Say I have /includes/foo.inc.php for example, someone
can put that in their URL and apache will happily serve it up. :(

Is there a directive to prevent this?

I would think it should be doable since PHP reads the file directly off of
disk via a command like this and isn't really served perse:

require_once ROOTPATH.'/includes/functions/foo.inc.php';

Anyone? Anyone? Beuller? Beuller?


LocationMatch ^/includes/

Order allow,deny
Deny from all

/LocationMatch

Cheers,
Rob.
--
http://www.interjinn.com
Application and Templating Framework for PHP

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



RE: [PHP] Apache rule/directive to stop serving PHP pages from /var/www/includes/ [SOLVED]

2010-04-01 Thread Daevid Vincent
 -Original Message-
 From: Robert Cummings [mailto:rob...@interjinn.com] 
 Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 7:23 PM
 To: Daevid Vincent
 Cc: php-general@lists.php.net
 Subject: Re: [PHP] Apache rule/directive to stop serving PHP 
 pages from /var/www/includes/
 
 Daevid Vincent wrote:
  (Sorry if this is a duplicate. I sent one earlier with 
 OT: prefixing the
  subject line and I think this list software kills the 
 message despite being
  proper netiquette. *sigh*)
  
  I have your basic web tree setup.
   
  develo...@mypse:/var/www/dart2$ tree -d -I 'CVS'
  |-- UPDATES
  |-- ajax
  |-- images
  |   |-- gui
  |   `-- icons
  `-- includes
  |-- classes
  |-- css
  |-- functions
  |   `-- xml
  |-- gui
  |-- js
  |   |-- charts
  `-- pear
  |-- Auth
  |-- Benchmark
  |-- DB
  |-- Date
  |-- File
  |-- Spreadsheet
  `-- XML_RPC
   
  It's not ideal. I would normally have /includes/ in a 
 directory outside the
  servable webroot directory, but for various reasons I won't 
 go into, this
  is how it is.
  
  Now I have Apache configured to NOT allow directory browsing.
  
  I also have a index.html file in most all main directories 
 to log attempts
  and also redirect back to the main site.
  
  What I don't know how to protect against is if someone were 
 to KNOW the
  name of a .php file. Say I have /includes/foo.inc.php for 
 example, someone
  can put that in their URL and apache will happily serve it up. :(
  
  Is there a directive to prevent this?
  
  I would think it should be doable since PHP reads the file 
 directly off of
  disk via a command like this and isn't really served perse:
  
  require_once ROOTPATH.'/includes/functions/foo.inc.php';
  
  Anyone? Anyone? Beuller? Beuller?
 
 LocationMatch ^/includes/
 
  Order allow,deny
  Deny from all
 
 /LocationMatch

Brilliant! Thanks Rob.

Here is the final that I went with (turns out I had to mind the
/includes/js directory or all my jQuery stuff STB, so that's why I call
each directory out like that):

develo...@myvm:/etc/apache2/sites-enabled$ tail -n20 000-default

# [dv] added 2010-04-01 to prevent serving include files and such
LocationMatch /UPDATES/
Order allow,deny
Deny from all
/LocationMatch
FilesMatch \.sql$
Order allow,deny
Deny from all
/FilesMatch
LocationMatch /includes/(classes|functions|gui|pear)/
Order allow,deny
Deny from all
/LocationMatch
FilesMatch \.(inc|class)\.php$
Order allow,deny
Deny from all
/FilesMatch


-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php