Re: [PHP] PHPEclipse?
Hi Dan I am the one building all the phpeclipse cvs releases. The latest zip file was corrupted (July 11, 2004), but the previous one works. Or, wait until tomorrow early morning when I will post a working CVS build for this week. I am using it and building it on Eclipse 3.0 in linux/gtk, but by all accounts it works just fine under win32 as well. The only thing that I personally can't get working is the debugger, but haven't spent much time on it as var_dump statements serve me just fine for now. Dave On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 14:39:36 -0400, Dan Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I was wondering, is anyone running Eclipse 3.0 w/PHPEclipse 1.1.0? I'm having trouble getting it working. I downloaded the July .ZIP file and unzipped it into the plugins directory. Its not recognizing it. Anyone have this working? -Dan Joseph -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Re: Saving variables in a session in a destructor
Ahh, guess I didn't look hard enough! Thanks!
Dave
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:10:29 +0200, Red Wingate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe you check out the internals archives as an discussion about this topic
was held 1-2 days ago.
Hi all
Using PHP5, I am trying to save some properties of an object when it
is destroyed in its destructor, __destruct(). However, I have found
that the session variable is NOT stored unless I explicitly destroy
the object using unset(). If I leave php to finish executing the
script and automatically destroy the object, the destructor IS called,
however, the session variables are NOT saved. A quick code example
for clarity:
-
class StateMachine {
public $stateVariable;
function __destruct() {
$_SESSION['state'] = $this-stateVariable;
}
}
$sm = new StateMachine();
if (isset($_SESSION['state'])) {
$sm-stateVariable = $_SESSION['state'];
} else {
$sm-stateVariable = 'foobar';
}
(please ignore the obvious bad coding standard of making that var
public and accessing it, this is for simplicity of the example).
Unless I do an unset($sm); at the end of a script like this, the
$_SESSION array will never contain the state=foobar key/value.
Can anyone offer some insight into this?
Thanks!
Dave
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Saving variables in a session in a destructor
Hi all
Using PHP5, I am trying to save some properties of an object when it
is destroyed in its destructor, __destruct(). However, I have found
that the session variable is NOT stored unless I explicitly destroy
the object using unset(). If I leave php to finish executing the
script and automatically destroy the object, the destructor IS called,
however, the session variables are NOT saved. A quick code example
for clarity:
-
class StateMachine {
public $stateVariable;
function __destruct() {
$_SESSION['state'] = $this-stateVariable;
}
}
$sm = new StateMachine();
if (isset($_SESSION['state'])) {
$sm-stateVariable = $_SESSION['state'];
} else {
$sm-stateVariable = 'foobar';
}
(please ignore the obvious bad coding standard of making that var
public and accessing it, this is for simplicity of the example).
Unless I do an unset($sm); at the end of a script like this, the
$_SESSION array will never contain the state=foobar key/value.
Can anyone offer some insight into this?
Thanks!
Dave
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Construction
As far as I know, this is fairly common in most programming languages (but I just woke up so don't take my word on it!). It allows you a lot greater control over the construction of your class, since you can force the child class to override what the parent class's default member variable values are by calling the parent constructor first, or you can have it be overridden by the parent by calling the parent constructor at the end of the child's constructor. Dave On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 20:51:58 -0700, Jason Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you instantiate a child class, the parent class constructor is not called, is there a reason for this? anyone know of plans to change this at all, the obvious workaround is to call the parents constructor inside the childs constructor, but this seems kinda strange. Jason -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] a stupid question
Perhaps using: $ret = aFunction(); var_dump($ret); Then you'll see if aFunction() is returning anything. Dave On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 16:48:18 -0500, Matt Matijevich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] echo Some text.aFunction().some more text; [/snip] Have you checked to see if aFunction() is returning anything? -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] static __get function
Hi Marek
Thanks for the response
Two things you should notice is my declaration of the constructor as
private and the $ConfigSettings variable as static. This class is
designed in such a way that it can never be instantiated, preventing
loading the configuration file twice and possibly having inconsistent
copies of the config file in memory.
I've tried the __get and __set functions as just regular non-static
ones, but same problem.
I am using self:: instead of $this- because of the reasons mentioned
above about not wanting to instantiate the object, only have its static
members loaded. In this way I refer to the class, not a specific
instance of the class; a real instance should never really exist.
Dave
Marek Kilimajer wrote:
I'm not sure if it will help but do't define the magic functions as
public static, use just:
function __get(...)
The function is not public anyway, as it should no be called directly.
And to my knowledge self:: references a class, not an object. You
should use $this- instead.
David Goodlad static objectwrote:
Hi all...
I'm trying to build a simple configureation class (using the
singleton pattern). Using PHP5, I want to use the __get and __set
methods to access configuration settings for my site. However, they
don't work :P Here's my class definition:
class Configuration {
static private $ConfigSettings;
private function __construct() {
}
public static function __get($Setting) {
if (!is_array(self::$ConfigSettings)) {
require_once(dirname(__FILE__) . '/../../configs/Framework.conf.php');
}
if (isset(self::$ConfigSettings[$Setting])) {
return self::$ConfigSettings[$Setting];
}
return NULL;
}
public static function __set($Setting, $Value) {
self::$ConfigSettings[$Setting] = $Value;
}
}
However, instead of doing something like:
Configuration::DbType = 'mysql';
I have to use:
Configuration::__set('DbType', 'mysql');
It works, yes, but not quite like I want it to - it just seems 'ugly'
to me.
This is using PHP5 RC1 on Apache 2.0.49 (linux).
Any suggestions?
Dave
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] static __get function
Hi all...
I'm trying to build a simple configureation class (using the singleton
pattern). Using PHP5, I want to use the __get and __set methods to
access configuration settings for my site. However, they don't work :P
Here's my class definition:
class Configuration {
static private $ConfigSettings;
private function __construct() {
}
public static function __get($Setting) {
if (!is_array(self::$ConfigSettings)) {
require_once(dirname(__FILE__) .
'/../../configs/Framework.conf.php');
}
if (isset(self::$ConfigSettings[$Setting])) {
return self::$ConfigSettings[$Setting];
}
return NULL;
}
public static function __set($Setting, $Value) {
self::$ConfigSettings[$Setting] = $Value;
}
}
However, instead of doing something like:
Configuration::DbType = 'mysql';
I have to use:
Configuration::__set('DbType', 'mysql');
It works, yes, but not quite like I want it to - it just seems 'ugly' to me.
This is using PHP5 RC1 on Apache 2.0.49 (linux).
Any suggestions?
Dave
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
