Hello,
I need an alternative session control system different from the PHP
standard one, that does not need to use the headers, because it's for a
series of scripts that will be accessed through AJAX javascript code
inserted in different places of a web page which headers I do not
control, so I
Hello,
The following code is failing and I do not find the cause (please, note
that checkurl value and CURLOPT_PROXY are NOT the real values I'm using,
of course):
$ch = curl_init();
$checkurl = 'http://mycheckhost.com/';
curl_setopt ($ch, CURLOPT_TIMEOUT, 6000);
Hello,
I'm developing a PHP application that runs on GNU/Linux with php cli. A
process must launch another one and store its pid, so I use proc_open
and then proc_status to achieve that.
The child process must also get its own pid and write it down to a file.
After that, the calling process
The first thing that I probably do is to check for possible errors from
DB:
$result = mysql_query(SELECT * FROM inf_member WHERE
user_id='$user_id' );
if ( ! $result ) {
die (Could not perform query $query: .mysql_error().\n);
}
Regards,
On dom,
defined on
your one. I prefer to store first the query on a string to show it
complete if there's an error late, because it may show also the point.
On lun, 2007-01-29 at 00:39 +0100, Francisco M. Marzoa Alonso wrote:
The first thing that I probably do is to check for possible errors from
DB
On dom, 2007-01-28 at 18:51 -0500, nitrox . wrote:
I took the quotes off. I thought that quotes around numbers was wrong also.
Quotes are no necessary around numeric values, but they aren't wrong
neither, simply optional.
I added the error checking and this is the error:
Could not perform
On dom, 2007-01-28 at 18:20 -0600, Larry Garfield wrote:
On Sunday 28 January 2007 5:54 pm, Francisco M. Marzoa Alonso wrote:
On dom, 2007-01-28 at 18:51 -0500, nitrox . wrote:
I took the quotes off. I thought that quotes around numbers was wrong
also.
Quotes are no necessary around
Hello!
I'm new here, so I do not know if attachments are allowed, so I put my
code below.
I've written this to check memory consumption of PHP5 objects, because
I'm having memory problems with an OO XMLParser that I've written.
When I execute the code from cli, I get:
$ php MemTest.php
Obj1
On sáb, 2007-01-27 at 20:05 +, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2007-01-26 20:40:34 +0100:
I've written this to check memory consumption of PHP5 objects, because
I'm having memory problems with an OO XMLParser that I've written.
It measures something else though. The memory
M. Marzoa Alonso wrote:
AFAIK there's no other way to measure memory usage on PHP than this, if
you know something better it could be more constructive if you show it.
The last time I looked I think the xdebug module allowed you to get the
memory consumption of a given object in PHP. I
On sáb, 2007-01-27 at 23:51 -0500, Ron Piggott wrote:
I have date in the variable $date_reference in the format -MM-DD.
How do I find out the date before this and the date after this? Ron
http://us3.php.net/manual/en/function.date.php#68716
RTFM :-P
signature.asc
Description: This is
Following code:
?php
class SessionTestC {
protected $value;
function __construct ( $val ) {
$this-value = $val;
}
function GetValue () {
return $this-value;
}
}
if ( isset ($_SESSION['TestObj'])) {
echo 'Session Test is set to:
Thomas Munz wrote:
I think, its not possible to init an Objeect on a session.
Yes, it can.
The problem was with serialization. With session.auto_start set to 1 on
php.ini, seems like session's objects are unserialized before loading
the script, so the class is not loaded when the session
I've code like follows:
?php
class TestClass {
public static $Data = 'This is the data';
}
$Obj = new TestClass ();
$ClassName = get_class ($Obj);
echo $ClassName::$Data;
?
It gives me an error like:
Parse error: parse error, unexpected T_PAAMAYIM_NEKUDOTAYIM ...
I've found googling that it
Can I override static members in someway under PHP5? Is the answer is
negative, Why not?
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
If each element of the array is a string with those contains, it should
be sorted as you want just calling sort function. It will considerate
also rest of characters, of course, but the most significative should be
the first ones.
Another alternative is to wrote a quicksort function in PHP
Taking this code:
pre
?php
define (PATH_SEPARATOR, /);
$String=Root/One/Two/Three/Last;
$arr = explode ( PATH_SEPARATOR, $String );
var_dump ( $arr );
$arr = explode ( /, $String );
var_dump ( $arr );
?
/pre
It works fine in second case returing a five elements array, but in the
first one it
I've seen that's possible to add public members to objects dinamically,
such as:
?php
class TestClass {
public $One=1;
}
$Obj = new TestClass ();
$Obj-Two = 2;
echo $Obj-Two;
?
There'll be a public Two member that's not defined in the class.
Is it possible to add methods dinamically to an
Hi everybody,
I want to wrote a function that receives another function as parameter
that will be used as a Callback. Well, better a bit of code than
thousand words:
class TreeNode {
...
function Traverse ( CallBack ) {
$rtn = CallBack ($this);
foreach ($this-Sons as $Son) {
That's true for Germany and France and probably another european
countries, but in Spain by example we've just 512/128kbps paying the
same that a french by 6Mbps/512kbps. Never mind, this dammed country
continues being more the North of Africa than the South of Europe...
Best regards,
Michelle
Greetings Robin,
As far as you cannot lock another processes in the system, so this will
not give you the security that the resources will not change -and
probably they'll do it- while you're trying to download that file.
Best regards,
Robin Getz wrote:
I have been unable to find a php function
This code:
?php
class TestClass {
private $self;
function __construct () {
$this-self = $this;
}
}
$Obj = new TestClass ();
print_r ( $Obj );
echo br;
$Arr = (array) $Obj;
print_r ( $Arr );
?
Produce the following output:
TestClass Object ( [self:private] = TestClass Object
logical, indeed.
Francisco M. Marzoa Alonso wrote:
Produce the following output:
TestClass Object ( [self:private] = TestClass Object *RECURSION* )
Array ( [ TestClass self] = TestClass Object ( [self:private] =
TestClass Object *RECURSION* ) )
While I expect to find for the second line something
This is my second and last message on this issue.
Perhaps this list is not the best place to discuse about politics, but
it isn't for create and follow personal issues neither. In my (not-so
:-P) humble opinion everyone that follows this kind of threads is as
guilty of making noise as the one
Ok, I've write a function that emulates the Perl's bless one. It works
pretty well.
The idea comes to me when Rob suggest to parse the serialized data. I
think this is better -or at least faster- than parsing all serialized
data to modify object values: Just convert the object to an array,
to do it, now I
must work in another thing :-| )
Francisco M. Marzoa Alonso wrote:
Ok, I've write a function that emulates the Perl's bless one. It works
pretty well.
The idea comes to me when Rob suggest to parse the serialized data. I
think this is better -or at least faster- than parsing all
Try with \s instead of \b, I meant:
$pattern =
/(\sand\s)|(\snot\s)|(\sor\s)|(\s\s)|(\s\s)|(\s\.\s)|(\s\+\s)|(\s\|\|\s)|(\s\|\s)/i;
kioto wrote:
Hi all.
I have a problem: i want subs any characters from a string but i don't
have fix the problem.
The string that i want to manipulate is the value
Ok, I think I've got it now. The code is autoexplicative, the only
restriction is that the object must be converted to an array using the
function obj2array instead of a direct cast. There's another ways to do
this without the needless of that obj2array function, but I think this
is not really
Giving it a round, this seems to be a better aproach than the previous
one. It has the advantage of provide direct access to the original array
obtained from casting without boring about ___FAKE_KEYS_.
?
function obj2array ( $Instance ) {
$clone = (array) $Instance;
$rtn = array ();
Nick Wilson wrote:
Hello all,
I was wondering if anyone might have suggestions or useful links on
protecting commercial php scripts.
I am about to design a system that would be pretty valuable in a very
niche market and would not wish the script to be passed on to others
once downloaded.
Nick Wilson wrote:
* and then Francisco M. Marzoa Alonso declared
I was wondering if anyone might have suggestions or useful links on
protecting commercial php scripts.
I am about to design a system that would be pretty valuable in a very
niche market and would not wish the script
I've seen that's possible to add members to objects dinamically, in example:
class MyClass {
private $a;
}
$MyObject = new MyClass ();
$MyObject-b = 1;
Now $MyObject has a public member called 'b' that has a value of '1'.
The question is, is it possible to add methods in the same way?
I meant
Hi,
Is it possible to convert an array in an object instance?
I can convert an object in an array as follows:
$Test = new MyClass ();
$TestArray = (array) $Test;
Then I've an array with all members of the object $Test, but it seems
that I cannot simply do:
$TestObject = (MyClass) $TestArray;
To
Use regular expresions:
?php
$string = pid_1_date_2004_10_25;
preg_match ( '/^pid_(.*?)_date_(.*?)$/', $string, $regs );
print_r ($regs);
?
Shaun wrote:
Hi,
I have a string as follows: pid_1_date_2004_10_25
pid tells me the Project_ID and date tells me the date(!). I need to extract
this
You can also use split function if you do not know about regular
expressions and do not want to learn:
?php
$string = pid_1_date_2004_10_25;
$regs = split (_, $string );
print_r ($regs);
?
I think its autoexplicative.
Shaun wrote:
Hi,
I have a string as follows: pid_1_date_2004_10_25
pid tells
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No. You need to remember that in most cases where you cast a variable from
one type to another, you will experience data (precision) loss. This is
also the case in converting an object to an array. Only the properties are
copied over (since functions can not be part of an
Marek Kilimajer wrote:
Francisco M. Marzoa Alonso wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No. You need to remember that in most cases where you cast a
variable from
one type to another, you will experience data (precision) loss. This is
also the case in converting an object to an array. Only
Curt Zirzow wrote:
* Thus wrote Francisco M. Marzoa Alonso:
FYI, the reason I need this is because I'm creating my own object's
serialization routines.
Why would you want to do this?
I was walking through the forest when, suddenly, a white light comes
from the west through the trees
Hi,
I'm trying to wrote my own serialization routines and I've found a
previsible problem: protected members are not visible to my
serialization routine. This is ok and it should be as is, but I've seen
that PHP's serialize function have access to that members anyway, so the
question is: Is
Just a point: this will be a problem if they have some forward slashes
that are not specifying file paths, i.e. URLs in the code like
http://www.whereveryouwant.com/ will be substituted by
http:\\www.whereveryouwant.com\
Greg Donald wrote:
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 13:17:08 +0200, Patrick Fehr
This code:
?php
class TestClass {
public $myself;
function __construct () {
$this-myself = $this;
}
}
$TestObj = new TestClass ();
if ( $TestObj-myself == $TestObj ) {
echo They are same.\n;
}
?
Gives me a Fatal error: Nesting level too deep - recursive dependency?
on line
Can someone tell me if I should fill a bug report about this or is it my
fault???
Francisco M. Marzoa Alonso wrote:
This code:
?php
class TestClass {
public $myself;
function __construct () {
$this-myself = $this;
}
}
$TestObj = new TestClass ();
if ( $TestObj-myself
Ah, OK thanks for your advice Chris.
Chris Dowell wrote:
Francisco
You really need to post this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - this list is
for us lowly users of PHP, the developers and maintainers of the
language have their own list.
Cheers
Chris
Francisco M. Marzoa Alonso wrote:
Can someone tell me
43 matches
Mail list logo
