Re: [PHP] Apache 2.0 + PHP

2002-07-16 Thread Austin Gonyou 

On Mon, 2002-07-15 at 18:30, Gerard Samuel wrote:
> I dont think Apache 2 or php 4.3.x are meant for production boxes..
> My opinion, the latest verion of apache 1.3.x and php 4.1.2 (my test
> box 
> is 4.2.1 but thats ok)

Apache2 is meant for production. 
Php 4.2.1 is meant for production. 

With most distros, this should not be a problem whatsoever, but people
using gcc3 may have no luck until they use php 4.3. This has been my
experience with it to date. 


> Michael Hall wrote:
> 
> >I've had a hunt through the mail archives but can't find a definite
> >answer:
> >
> >Is Apache 2.0.x and PHP 4.2.x/4.3.x on Linux a viable proposition yet
> in a
> >production environment? 
> >
> >I guess the diversity of experiences described in the archives
> probably
> >means no, but what is the current opinion? Some of the archive
> messages
> >I read are quite old now.
> >
> >
> >
> >Michael Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> -- 
> Gerard Samuel
> http://www.trini0.org:81/
> http://dev.trini0.org:81/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
-- 
Austin Gonyou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Coremetrics, Inc.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [PHP] Apache 2.0 + PHP

2002-07-15 Thread Gerard Samuel 

I dont think Apache 2 or php 4.3.x are meant for production boxes..
My opinion, the latest verion of apache 1.3.x and php 4.1.2 (my test box 
is 4.2.1 but thats ok)

Michael Hall wrote:

>I've had a hunt through the mail archives but can't find a definite
>answer:
>
>Is Apache 2.0.x and PHP 4.2.x/4.3.x on Linux a viable proposition yet in a
>production environment? 
>
>I guess the diversity of experiences described in the archives probably
>means no, but what is the current opinion? Some of the archive messages
>I read are quite old now.
>
>
>
>Michael Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>  
>

-- 
Gerard Samuel
http://www.trini0.org:81/
http://dev.trini0.org:81/




-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP] Apache 2.0 + PHP

2002-07-15 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf 

> Is Apache 2.0.x and PHP 4.2.x/4.3.x on Linux a viable proposition yet in a
> production environment?

Nope

-Rasmus


-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP] Apache 2.0 + PHP

2002-07-15 Thread Tyler Longren 

In a production environment: no
for fun: yes

-- 
Tyler Longren
Captain Jack Communications
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.captainjack.com



On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 09:13:41 +0930 (CST)
Michael Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> I've had a hunt through the mail archives but can't find a definite
> answer:
> 
> Is Apache 2.0.x and PHP 4.2.x/4.3.x on Linux a viable proposition yet
> in a production environment? 
> 
> I guess the diversity of experiences described in the archives
> probably means no, but what is the current opinion? Some of the
> archive messages I read are quite old now.
> 
> 
> 
> Michael Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> 

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php