On Tuesday 19 December 2006 21:52, Jochem Maas wrote:
tedd wrote:
At 3:50 PM -0500 12/18/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm going to be controversial here and take issue with both of you.
2. Pointing out someone's signature as being off topic is even further
off topic for this list.
Børge Holen wrote:
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 21:52, Jochem Maas wrote:
tedd wrote:
...
bah, I refuse to be the last BADman on this list before christmas, the last
week trip to Prague really helped on the bloody selfesteam.
Yeh, so on to the point. Sorry for any bad words to the loving
tedd wrote:
At 3:50 PM -0500 12/18/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm going to be controversial here and take issue with both of you.
2. Pointing out someone's signature as being off topic is even further
off topic for this list. Please take personal issues into private
email. I bring it up
At 9:52 PM +0100 12/19/06, Jochem Maas wrote:
I guess if I start baiting all 3 of you (Roman, tedd, tg) that would
not be constructive? no probably not :-)
from my stance, I don't give 2 hoots about Roman's sig, Roman's reply style
sometimes leaves a little to be desired...
From my stance,
Cheers tedd! Thanks for coming around. Life's too short to stress about
stuff like this. There's always going to be people who don't understand (after
all.. HE WASNT THERE MAN! sorry.. I couldn't help it :) I wasn't there
either so my turn to be village idiot for a moment.. forgive the
5 matches
Mail list logo
