[PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Richard Davey
Hi all,

I'm very happy to announce that I've just released my comprehensive
guide to installing, configuring and running Apache 2, PHP 4.4.7 and
PHP 5.2.2 on Windows XP. The guide is broken down into small
manageable sections and contains over 50 screen shots of the entire
process, so you won't go wrong while following it.

It covers everything from installing Apache, to setting up a Virtual
host to switching between PHP 4 and 5. A troubleshooting section and
further advice rounds-off the guide.

You can read the guide here: http://wamp.corephp.co.uk

Please send comments / suggestions / typos to me.

Cheers,

Rich
-- 
Zend Certified Engineer
http://www.corephp.co.uk

Never trust a computer you can't throw out of a window

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Daniel Brown

On 5/17/07, Richard Davey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Hi all,

I'm very happy to announce that I've just released my comprehensive
guide to installing, configuring and running Apache 2, PHP 4.4.7 and
PHP 5.2.2 on Windows XP. The guide is broken down into small
manageable sections and contains over 50 screen shots of the entire
process, so you won't go wrong while following it.

It covers everything from installing Apache, to setting up a Virtual
host to switching between PHP 4 and 5. A troubleshooting section and
further advice rounds-off the guide.

You can read the guide here: http://wamp.corephp.co.uk

Please send comments / suggestions / typos to me.

Cheers,

Rich
--
Zend Certified Engineer
http://www.corephp.co.uk

Never trust a computer you can't throw out of a window

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



   Congratulations on a job well done, Rich.  I took a glance through and
checked every link (including download/page links and previous/next/index
links) on the site, and it all looks good.

--
Daniel P. Brown
[office] (570-) 587-7080 Ext. 272
[mobile] (570-) 766-8107


Re: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Robert Cummings
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 16:26 +0100, Richard Davey wrote:
 Hi all,
 
 I'm very happy to announce that I've just released my comprehensive
 guide to installing, configuring and running Apache 2, PHP 4.4.7 and
 PHP 5.2.2 on Windows XP. The guide is broken down into small
 manageable sections and contains over 50 screen shots of the entire
 process, so you won't go wrong while following it.
 
 It covers everything from installing Apache, to setting up a Virtual
 host to switching between PHP 4 and 5. A troubleshooting section and
 further advice rounds-off the guide.
 
 You can read the guide here: http://wamp.corephp.co.uk
 
 Please send comments / suggestions / typos to me.

Suggestion: get rid of Windows XP and use a real OS

Comment: Vista doesn't count

Typo: http://wamp.corephp.co.uk/help_01.php
  If Apache HAS worked previously in the past

  You have previously and the past redundancy since
  previous implies the past and past implies previous.

:)

Cheers,
Rob.
-- 
..
| InterJinn Application Framework - http://www.interjinn.com |
::
| An application and templating framework for PHP. Boasting  |
| a powerful, scalable system for accessing system services  |
| such as forms, properties, sessions, and caches. InterJinn |
| also provides an extremely flexible architecture for   |
| creating re-usable components quickly and easily.  |
`'

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re[2]: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Richard Davey
Hi Robert,

Thursday, May 17, 2007, 4:43:14 PM, you wrote:

 Suggestion: get rid of Windows XP and use a real OS

There's always one ;)

   You have previously and the past redundancy since
   previous implies the past and past implies previous.

Fixed :)

Cheers,

Rich
-- 
Zend Certified Engineer
http://www.corephp.co.uk

Never trust a computer you can't throw out of a window

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: Re[2]: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Greg Donald

On 5/17/07, Richard Davey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Suggestion: get rid of Windows XP and use a real OS

There's always one ;)



No, there's more than one.


--
Greg Donald
http://destiney.com/

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re[4]: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Richard Davey
Hi Greg,

Thursday, May 17, 2007, 5:01:18 PM, you wrote:

 There's always one ;)

 No, there's more than one.

Sure, but you're in the minority*, so what do I care? :)

* I just took the Zend PHP IDE research poll, and at the end it gives
you the chance to view the stats of everyone else who took the poll.
Interestingly, 70% of them use Windows XP for development.

I actually use a combination of Vista and OS X, which puts me in the
11% and 19% categories respectively.

Cheers,

Rich
-- 
Zend Certified Engineer
http://www.corephp.co.uk

Never trust a computer you can't throw out of a window

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: Re[4]: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Robert Cummings
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 17:19 +0100, Richard Davey wrote:
 Hi Greg,
 
 Thursday, May 17, 2007, 5:01:18 PM, you wrote:
 
  There's always one ;)
 
  No, there's more than one.
 
 Sure, but you're in the minority*, so what do I care? :)
 
 * I just took the Zend PHP IDE research poll, and at the end it gives
 you the chance to view the stats of everyone else who took the poll.
 Interestingly, 70% of them use Windows XP for development.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum

Cheers,
Rob.
-- 
..
| InterJinn Application Framework - http://www.interjinn.com |
::
| An application and templating framework for PHP. Boasting  |
| a powerful, scalable system for accessing system services  |
| such as forms, properties, sessions, and caches. InterJinn |
| also provides an extremely flexible architecture for   |
| creating re-usable components quickly and easily.  |
`'

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Jon Anderson

Richard Davey wrote:

Sure, but you're in the minority*, so what do I care? :)

* I just took the Zend PHP IDE research poll, and at the end it gives
you the chance to view the stats of everyone else who took the poll.
Interestingly, 70% of them use Windows XP for development.

I actually use a combination of Vista and OS X, which puts me in the
11% and 19% categories respectively.


I find it funny that the addition of the numbers above would logically 
put me in the 0% category.


My $0.02...I use Linux almost 100% of the time at work, and consider 
myself to be a linux guy. That said, I disagree with people who 
discard Windows as an option. If you develop in PHP, chances are pretty 
good that more than 85% of the people you're developing for will use 
Windows to view your end result. In my book, that makes a WAMP 
workstation/laptop a pretty good self-contained development environment.


Argumentum ad populum doesn't apply in the usage-for-development case. 
It's not asking If everyone else jumped off a bridge would you jump 
too? It's asking If everyone else jumped off a bridge, would you 
design your bridge with a soft fluffy landing spot?


jon

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: Re[4]: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Greg Donald

On 5/17/07, Richard Davey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Sure, but you're in the minority*, so what do I care? :)


I'm not asking you to care.  Windoze still sucks, no matter how many
idiots use it.  The virus protection racket alone is enough to make me
throw up.


--
Greg Donald
http://destiney.com/

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re[2]: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Richard Davey
Hi Jon,

Thursday, May 17, 2007, 5:46:12 PM, you wrote:

 I find it funny that the addition of the numbers above would logically
 put me in the 0% category.

You could select multiple operating systems from the list. 50% of them
used Linux too. It didn't show how the results were mixed though, i.e.
of the 70%+ that used XP, did 10% or 90% of them also use Linux.

I thought it interesting none-the-less.

Cheers,

Rich
-- 
Zend Certified Engineer
http://www.corephp.co.uk

Never trust a computer you can't throw out of a window

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re[6]: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Richard Davey
Hi Greg,

Thursday, May 17, 2007, 5:49:45 PM, you wrote:

 Sure, but you're in the minority*, so what do I care? :)

 I'm not asking you to care.  Windoze still sucks, no matter how many
 idiots use it.  The virus protection racket alone is enough to make me
 throw up.

Viruses? God, that old bullshit ladened chestnut*. At least come up
with some kind of valid OS argument, please. If you'd gone for
'competent use of the CPU', or 'effective memory management', you'd be
worth taking seriously.

Unless you're not asking me to take you seriously of course.

Cheers,

Rich
* I've not had a virus -infect- a Windows box for over a decade.
-- 
Zend Certified Engineer
http://www.corephp.co.uk

Never trust a computer you can't throw out of a window

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: Re[6]: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Jason Pruim


On May 17, 2007, at 1:00 PM, Richard Davey wrote:


Hi Greg,

Thursday, May 17, 2007, 5:49:45 PM, you wrote:


Sure, but you're in the minority*, so what do I care? :)



I'm not asking you to care.  Windoze still sucks, no matter how many
idiots use it.  The virus protection racket alone is enough to  
make me

throw up.


Viruses? God, that old bullshit ladened chestnut*. At least come up
with some kind of valid OS argument, please. If you'd gone for
'competent use of the CPU', or 'effective memory management', you'd be
worth taking seriously.


Not to start a holy war... But I've never had a virus infect a  
Macintosh... And I've been using Mac's since the mid 80's... And  
Apple before that :)


Now... To add something useful to this discussions, I whole heartily  
believe unless you are the only one that is EVER going to use your  
killer application... It should work and look good on any piece of  
crap(read: ALL OF THEM) operating system... Because if we get down to  
it... Every single person on this list could think of 50 things they  
want to change on their current operating system. If you couldn't,  
How can you be considered a developer? ; )




--

Jason Pruim
Raoset Inc.
Technology Manager
MQC Specialist
3251 132nd ave
Holland, MI, 49424
www.raoset.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

In a world without Walls  Fences, one needs neither Windows, nor  
Gates




Re: Re[6]: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Daniel Brown

On 5/17/07, Richard Davey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Hi Greg,

Thursday, May 17, 2007, 5:49:45 PM, you wrote:

 Sure, but you're in the minority*, so what do I care? :)

 I'm not asking you to care.  Windoze still sucks, no matter how many
 idiots use it.  The virus protection racket alone is enough to make me
 throw up.

Viruses? God, that old bullshit ladened chestnut*. At least come up
with some kind of valid OS argument, please. If you'd gone for
'competent use of the CPU', or 'effective memory management', you'd be
worth taking seriously.

Unless you're not asking me to take you seriously of course.

Cheers,

Rich
* I've not had a virus -infect- a Windows box for over a decade.
--
Zend Certified Engineer
http://www.corephp.co.uk

Never trust a computer you can't throw out of a window

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



   It seems to me as though the OS argument is almost ignorant enough to
equate as, I have no desire to be a pilot, so to hell with teaching anyone
else to be.

   PHP is meant to be as cross-platform as possible, and to have an open
source project *REALLY* succeed, it needs to be accessible on a variety of
platforms and distributions.  One may only have access to a Windows machine
at home, work, or school, and/or may not be able to modify something as key
as the operating system.  Additionally, perhaps they need to interface said
OS with Microsoft-proprietary software or something only available on a
Win32 machine.  To discount a tutorial on how to do this is ludicrous I
guarantee that not one of us here has gotten to where we are now --- let
alone where we'll be in the future --- without the help of an online
walk-through or two, even if someone, somewhere, considered it to be less
than worthwhile.

   I am a Linux user myself - at work, at home, and even in my vehicles.
While I prefer the Linux operating system as a whole over any other, it is
just that --- I *prefer* it.  Sure, I push for others to at least give it a
try, but I'm not going to classify someone as an idiot because they choose
not to get off of the Windows platform.  I just fail to see how such
closed-mindedness is in any way beneficial to the evolution and advancement
of the open source community, and moreover, technological advancements as a
whole.

   So with my two cents in there as well, we've almost got enough for a can
of soda to get the bad taste of this conversation out of our mouths.  I vote
for ginger ale, so that it will calm Greg's stomach after the virus
protection racket ad nauseum the poor guy experiences.  We don't need any
vomit on our nice, clean list.

--
Daniel P. Brown
[office] (570-) 587-7080 Ext. 272
[mobile] (570-) 766-8107


Re: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Lester Caine

Richard Davey wrote:

Viruses? God, that old bullshit ladened chestnut*. At least come up
with some kind of valid OS argument, please. If you'd gone for
'competent use of the CPU', or 'effective memory management', you'd be
worth taking seriously.


How about installation time. Just clocked up 6.5 Hours re-installing XP on a 
machine. To get the last linux machine to the same level - 20 mins.

Of cause running Eclipse - it does not matter what the OS is :(


* I've not had a virus -infect- a Windows box for over a decade.


Same here - except for the site that insisted on using IE - they are back on 
SeaMonkey now :(


--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-
Contact - http://home.lsces.co.uk/lsces/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://home.lsces.co.uk
MEDW - http://home.lsces.co.uk/ModelEngineersDigitalWorkshop/
Firebird Foundation Inc. - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: Re[6]: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Crayon Shin Chan
On Friday 18 May 2007 01:00, Richard Davey wrote:

 Viruses? God, that old bullshit ladened chestnut*. At least come up
 with some kind of valid OS argument, please. If you'd gone for
 'competent use of the CPU', or 'effective memory management', you'd be
 worth taking seriously.

In a roundabout way, having to run a virus scanner is not a 
very 'competent use of the CPU', or 'effective memory management'. Or 
maybe Greg wanted to point out that Windows *is* the virus?

-- 
Crayon

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Robert Cummings
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 12:46 -0400, Jon Anderson wrote:
 Richard Davey wrote:
  Sure, but you're in the minority*, so what do I care? :)
 
  * I just took the Zend PHP IDE research poll, and at the end it gives
  you the chance to view the stats of everyone else who took the poll.
  Interestingly, 70% of them use Windows XP for development.
 
  I actually use a combination of Vista and OS X, which puts me in the
  11% and 19% categories respectively.
 
 I find it funny that the addition of the numbers above would logically 
 put me in the 0% category.
 
 My $0.02...I use Linux almost 100% of the time at work, and consider 
 myself to be a linux guy. That said, I disagree with people who 
 discard Windows as an option. If you develop in PHP, chances are pretty 
 good that more than 85% of the people you're developing for will use 
 Windows to view your end result. In my book, that makes a WAMP 
 workstation/laptop a pretty good self-contained development environment.
 
 Argumentum ad populum doesn't apply in the usage-for-development case. 
 It's not asking If everyone else jumped off a bridge would you jump 
 too? It's asking If everyone else jumped off a bridge, would you 
 design your bridge with a soft fluffy landing spot?

The Argumentum ad populum reference I made is quite applicable.
Otherwise, if not to lean on argumentum ad populum, why would he make a
reference to 70% of the poll using Windows XP?

Cheers,
Rob.
-- 
..
| InterJinn Application Framework - http://www.interjinn.com |
::
| An application and templating framework for PHP. Boasting  |
| a powerful, scalable system for accessing system services  |
| such as forms, properties, sessions, and caches. InterJinn |
| also provides an extremely flexible architecture for   |
| creating re-usable components quickly and easily.  |
`'

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: Re[6]: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Robert Cummings
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 13:13 -0400, Jason Pruim wrote:
 On May 17, 2007, at 1:00 PM, Richard Davey wrote:
 
  Hi Greg,
 
  Thursday, May 17, 2007, 5:49:45 PM, you wrote:
 
  Sure, but you're in the minority*, so what do I care? :)
 
  I'm not asking you to care.  Windoze still sucks, no matter how many
  idiots use it.  The virus protection racket alone is enough to  
  make me
  throw up.
 
  Viruses? God, that old bullshit ladened chestnut*. At least come up
  with some kind of valid OS argument, please. If you'd gone for
  'competent use of the CPU', or 'effective memory management', you'd be
  worth taking seriously.
 
 Not to start a holy war... But I've never had a virus infect a  
 Macintosh... And I've been using Mac's since the mid 80's... And  
 Apple before that :)
 
 Now... To add something useful to this discussions, I whole heartily  
 believe unless you are the only one that is EVER going to use your  
 killer application... It should work and look good on any piece of  
 crap(read: ALL OF THEM) operating system... Because if we get down to  
 it... Every single person on this list could think of 50 things they  
 want to change on their current operating system. If you couldn't,  
 How can you be considered a developer? ; )

I had 500 things I wanted to change, then I switched from Windows to
Linux in 2000 and found that they had been addressed. Sure enough
though, I'm working on a new list. There's only a few things on it
though ;)

Cheers,
Rob.
-- 
..
| InterJinn Application Framework - http://www.interjinn.com |
::
| An application and templating framework for PHP. Boasting  |
| a powerful, scalable system for accessing system services  |
| such as forms, properties, sessions, and caches. InterJinn |
| also provides an extremely flexible architecture for   |
| creating re-usable components quickly and easily.  |
`'

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: Re[6]: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Robert Cummings
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 01:44 +0800, Crayon Shin Chan wrote:
 On Friday 18 May 2007 01:00, Richard Davey wrote:
 
  Viruses? God, that old bullshit ladened chestnut*. At least come up
  with some kind of valid OS argument, please. If you'd gone for
  'competent use of the CPU', or 'effective memory management', you'd be
  worth taking seriously.
 
 In a roundabout way, having to run a virus scanner is not a 
 very 'competent use of the CPU', or 'effective memory management'. Or 
 maybe Greg wanted to point out that Windows *is* the virus?

Nah, Windows is certainly not the virus. It's more akin to a gaping
unclean wound upon which the viruses feast.

Cheers,
Rob.
-- 
..
| InterJinn Application Framework - http://www.interjinn.com |
::
| An application and templating framework for PHP. Boasting  |
| a powerful, scalable system for accessing system services  |
| such as forms, properties, sessions, and caches. InterJinn |
| also provides an extremely flexible architecture for   |
| creating re-usable components quickly and easily.  |
`'

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: Re[6]: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Greg Donald

On 5/17/07, Richard Davey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Viruses? God, that old bullshit ladened chestnut*. At least come up
with some kind of valid OS argument, please.


1. The virus and malware protection racket - M$ spent billions of
dollars and several years making Vista and just like normal it's fully
exploitable and insecure.  Vista currently has 22 critical exploits
listed at securityfocus.com and it's only been out how long?  If 22
security researchers are willing to publicly give up their findings do
you have any clue how many are keeping their findings secret to sell
to the highest bidder?  Do have any clue how much a working windoze
exploit goes for nowadays?  You think all those botnets just happened
by accident?  All together now, everyone thank M$ for your daily spam.

2. Perpetual Upgrading - you can use Ubuntu Linux 6.06 Server Edition
until 2011, fully supported.  How long til you're forced to upgrade to
Vista?  How long before your WinXP install is no longer supported?  I
would further argue that upgrading a Ubuntu Linux OS is painless.
When 2011 comes around, I can do `apt-get update; apt-get
dist-upgrade` to move on.  No trips to CompUSA to shell out hundreds
of dollars, no upgrading my hardware, none of that.  Gentoo Linux is
very simple to upgrade too.  I relinked my make.profile to the 2007.0
version and `emerge -uDN` away I go.  I have a Gentoo box that I've
upgraded that way for 4 years now.  I have a FreeBSD box that I
brought all the way from 4.0 to 6.2 by doing `make buildworld` once a
year or so.  Microsoft hasn't a clue how to make a simple forward
upgrade path for their lusers.  But that's how Intel likes it.

3. Bloat - 1.5+ hours to install Vista then finally you get to start
installing 'apps'.  At that point you find out Vista doesn't support
your two year old 3com ethernet card.  3com!  Fucking 3com is not
supported?  Jesus Christ.  With Linux you install for 20-30 minutes
and immediately have 99% of your apps ready to go.  The hardest thing
to decide is what color I want to make my bash prompt this year.

4. Hostile treatment of customers - M$ is currently choosing to not
sue 'opensource' for 235 patent violations.  They still want money
however, and without showing anyone which patents are being violated.
RedHat Linux has stated they will gladly indemnify their users without
anyone paying any M$ tax.  I hate RPMS as much as the next guy but a
bad day fighting RPMS dependencies is still better than a good day
fighting M$ viruses (or virii depending on how far north your grade
school was located).

I always correct people when I hear them say 'computer virus'.  I
explain how it's a 'Microsoft virus' because in all likelyhood it only
affects the idiots running a windoze OS.

5. Predatory Practices - How many companies have been eaten alive by
M$ over the years?  More than I can count or care to list.  Innovation
my ass.  This guy got tired of listing them and gave up several years
ago it seems:  http://www.vcnet.com/bms/departments/catalog/yrcatalog.shtml

6. .NET - proof M$ really wants to be a bank instead of a software
vendor.  Subscription based software?  Give me a break.

7. IE7 - My transparent pngs are almost working, almost.  Guess they
are trying not to do too much at one time.


You can read more on the web:
http://www.google.com/search?q=windows+sucks+because

1.62M results, but you probably already knew that being in the M$
loving majority and all.



--
Greg Donald
http://destiney.com/

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re[2]: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Richard Davey
Hi Lester,

Thursday, May 17, 2007, 6:24:44 PM, you wrote:

 How about installation time. Just clocked up 6.5 Hours re-installing XP on a
 machine. To get the last linux machine to the same level - 20 mins.
 Of cause running Eclipse - it does not matter what the OS is :(

Yeah I'd take installation time as a valid reason why XP sucks
sometimes :) I was very pleased to see that Vista installed in next to no
time at all, but let's not go there... one day someone will invent an
OS as powerful as my old Amiga used to have!

Cheers,

Rich
-- 
Zend Certified Engineer
http://www.corephp.co.uk

Never trust a computer you can't throw out of a window

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re[8]: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Richard Davey
Hi Robert,

Thursday, May 17, 2007, 7:01:00 PM, you wrote:

 I had 500 things I wanted to change, then I switched from Windows to
 Linux in 2000 and found that they had been addressed. Sure enough
 though, I'm working on a new list. There's only a few things on it
 though ;)

I envy those who's work is specific / targeted enough for them to be
able to only use Linux on their desktop, I really do (and I say that
without a hint of sarcasm, I promise). For the rest of us, the choice
sadly isn't as black and white.

Cheers,

Rich
-- 
Zend Certified Engineer
http://www.corephp.co.uk

Never trust a computer you can't throw out of a window

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: Re[8]: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Greg Donald

On 5/17/07, Richard Davey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I envy those who's work is specific / targeted enough for them to be
able to only use Linux on their desktop, I really do (and I say that
without a hint of sarcasm, I promise). For the rest of us, the choice
sadly isn't as black and white.



It's simple.  In the job interview you ask, Will I be able to use
Linux (or Mac OS) as my primary desktop OS?

When they say no, you get up and leave.  I've done it twice in the
past year or so.

I could only image the stupidity I would have found once inside the
door if they exhibited that level of clueless-ness in the interview.
One company actually told me they were afraid I would be pirating
software unless I used a windoze OS that could be 'audited' by their
sysadmins.  I blinked a couple of times, got up, and walked out.


--
Greg Donald
http://destiney.com/

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re[8]: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Richard Davey
Hi Greg,

Thursday, May 17, 2007, 7:23:47 PM, you wrote:

 Viruses? God, that old bullshit ladened chestnut*. At least come up
 with some kind of valid OS argument, please.

 1. The virus and malware protection racket - M$ spent billions of
 2. Perpetual Upgrading - you can use Ubuntu Linux 6.06 Server Edition
 3. Bloat - 1.5+ hours to install Vista then finally you get to start
 4. Hostile treatment of customers - M$ is currently choosing to not
 5. Predatory Practices - How many companies have been eaten alive by
 6. .NET - proof M$ really wants to be a bank instead of a software
 7. IE7 - My transparent pngs are almost working, almost.  Guess they

Yay, some decent arguments! I don't deny any of them, I only take
exception to being called an 'idiot' by yourself for the OS I have to
use. You have no idea at all what I do for a living, what apps I need
to run, what software I have to develop, and I'm afraid the area in
which I work (games/movie industry) is not a Linux friendly one in
the slightest.

You see for all the upgrading wonders and angelic like behaviour of
your OS creators, it doesn't count for shit if I can't use it for
work, and there - as is probably the case for the vast majority of
people stuck with Windows - is where the buck stops.

Cheers,

Rich
-- 
Zend Certified Engineer
http://www.corephp.co.uk

Never trust a computer you can't throw out of a window

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: Re[8]: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Greg Donald

On 5/17/07, Richard Davey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Yay, some decent arguments! I don't deny any of them, I only take
exception to being called an 'idiot' by yourself for the OS I have to
use.


I apologize.  I meant it in a stereotypical, M$-hating, sort of way..
nothing towards you personally.


You have no idea at all what I do for a living, what apps I need
to run, what software I have to develop, and I'm afraid the area in
which I work (games/movie industry) is not a Linux friendly one in
the slightest.


You have my sympathy.  Have you tried pushing medibuntu?

http://medibuntu.sos-sts.com/


You see for all the upgrading wonders and angelic like behaviour of
your OS creators


They're certainly no angels, just pragmatists with no resources to waste.


it doesn't count for shit if I can't use it for
work,and there - as is probably the case for the vast majority of
people stuck with Windows - is where the buck stops.


I used to have to use windoze at this one job several years ago and it
in no way forced me to also use it at home.  It's all about desire and
will.


--
Greg Donald
http://destiney.com/

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Stut

Richard Davey wrote:

I'm very happy to announce that I've just released my comprehensive
guide to installing, configuring and running Apache 2, PHP 4.4.7 and
PHP 5.2.2 on Windows XP. The guide is broken down into small
manageable sections and contains over 50 screen shots of the entire
process, so you won't go wrong while following it.

It covers everything from installing Apache, to setting up a Virtual
host to switching between PHP 4 and 5. A troubleshooting section and
further advice rounds-off the guide.

You can read the guide here: http://wamp.corephp.co.uk

Please send comments / suggestions / typos to me.


Nice work Richard.

I'd just like to say that I think a few other people on this list need 
to take the big sticks out of their butts for a second and appreciate a 
quality piece of work, that Richard has published for everyone to take 
it or leave it. What do you guys do? You start a discussion that has 
nothing to do with Richard's article, and if anything it will discourage 
him from writing similar articles in the future. However, from his 
responses so far he's intelligent enough to see past it.


Like it or not, and agree with it or not, there are a great many 
developers out there who either have to or choose to use Windows as 
their development platform, and a fair few who also choose to use it as 
a production platform. I can't believe there is anyone in these 
categories who doesn't know that alternatives exist, and who don't have 
the necessary skills to research the differences and make an informed 
decision.


So, from me, congratulations Richard, excellent work, keep it up.

-Stut

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Robert Cummings
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 20:18 +0100, Stut wrote:
 Richard Davey wrote:
  I'm very happy to announce that I've just released my comprehensive
  guide to installing, configuring and running Apache 2, PHP 4.4.7 and
  PHP 5.2.2 on Windows XP. The guide is broken down into small
  manageable sections and contains over 50 screen shots of the entire
  process, so you won't go wrong while following it.
  
  It covers everything from installing Apache, to setting up a Virtual
  host to switching between PHP 4 and 5. A troubleshooting section and
  further advice rounds-off the guide.
  
  You can read the guide here: http://wamp.corephp.co.uk
  
  Please send comments / suggestions / typos to me.
 
 Nice work Richard.
 
 I'd just like to say that I think a few other people on this list need 
 to take the big sticks out of their butts for a second and appreciate a 
 quality piece of work, that Richard has published for everyone to take 
 it or leave it. What do you guys do? You start a discussion that has 
 nothing to do with Richard's article, and if anything it will discourage 
 him from writing similar articles in the future. However, from his 
 responses so far he's intelligent enough to see past it.
 
 Like it or not, and agree with it or not, there are a great many 
 developers out there who either have to or choose to use Windows as 
 their development platform, and a fair few who also choose to use it as 
 a production platform. I can't believe there is anyone in these 
 categories who doesn't know that alternatives exist, and who don't have 
 the necessary skills to research the differences and make an informed 
 decision.
 
 So, from me, congratulations Richard, excellent work, keep it up.

Well in all honesty, my original post was tongue in cheek, I didn't
think it would go on and on from there.

BTW, could someone get behind me and give that stick thing that's poking
out a pull. I've been having trouble walking lately ;)

Bh, come on, help a guy out. IT CHAFFES!!

Cheers,
Rob.

Ps. I apologize in advance to anyone who accidentally got caught up in
some errant mental imagery. Blame Stut!! *heheh* *cackles and runs*

-- 
..
| InterJinn Application Framework - http://www.interjinn.com |
::
| An application and templating framework for PHP. Boasting  |
| a powerful, scalable system for accessing system services  |
| such as forms, properties, sessions, and caches. InterJinn |
| also provides an extremely flexible architecture for   |
| creating re-usable components quickly and easily.  |
`'

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Stut

Robert Cummings wrote:

BTW, could someone get behind me and give that stick thing that's poking
out a pull. I've been having trouble walking lately ;)


Not a chance in hell I'm going near that!!


Ps. I apologize in advance to anyone who accidentally got caught up in
some errant mental imagery. Blame Stut!! *heheh* *cackles and runs*


Yup, blame me. Everything else seems to be my fault at the moment. Get 
to the back of the line!


-Stut

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php