Re: [PHP] Apache 2.0 + PHP

2002-07-16 Thread Austin Gonyou
On Mon, 2002-07-15 at 18:30, Gerard Samuel wrote: I dont think Apache 2 or php 4.3.x are meant for production boxes.. My opinion, the latest verion of apache 1.3.x and php 4.1.2 (my test box is 4.2.1 but thats ok) Apache2 is meant for production. Php 4.2.1 is meant for production.

[PHP] Apache 2.0 + PHP

2002-07-15 Thread Michael Hall
I've had a hunt through the mail archives but can't find a definite answer: Is Apache 2.0.x and PHP 4.2.x/4.3.x on Linux a viable proposition yet in a production environment? I guess the diversity of experiences described in the archives probably means no, but what is the current opinion?

Re: [PHP] Apache 2.0 + PHP

2002-07-15 Thread Tyler Longren
In a production environment: no for fun: yes -- Tyler Longren Captain Jack Communications [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.captainjack.com On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 09:13:41 +0930 (CST) Michael Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've had a hunt through the mail archives but can't find a definite answer:

Re: [PHP] Apache 2.0 + PHP

2002-07-15 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
Is Apache 2.0.x and PHP 4.2.x/4.3.x on Linux a viable proposition yet in a production environment? Nope -Rasmus -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP] Apache 2.0 + PHP

2002-07-15 Thread Gerard Samuel
I dont think Apache 2 or php 4.3.x are meant for production boxes.. My opinion, the latest verion of apache 1.3.x and php 4.1.2 (my test box is 4.2.1 but thats ok) Michael Hall wrote: I've had a hunt through the mail archives but can't find a definite answer: Is Apache 2.0.x and PHP