Ed W wrote:
RSS is staying approximately constant, ie the memory in use has not
changed much
VSZ, ie virtual memory has increased by more than 2x2=4. If someone
has some hard experience of both platforms then please add some
experience to this - however, I'm looking for some hard debugging
Aschwin Wesselius wrote:
Ed W wrote:
RSS is staying approximately constant, ie the memory in use has not
changed much
VSZ, ie virtual memory has increased by more than 2x2=4. If someone
has some hard experience of both platforms then please add some
experience to this - however, I'm
Ed W wrote:
45MB x2 is a lot less than 215MB...
Also, I would expect the actual consumption to be less than 2x since
not all the data will be doubled in size..?
Any other suggestions on how to debug this 5x jump in memory usage?
Thanks
Ed W
Robert Cummings wrote:
64 bit integers are
Aschwin Wesselius wrote:
Ed W wrote:
45MB x2 is a lot less than 215MB...
Also, I would expect the actual consumption to be less than 2x since
not all the data will be doubled in size..?
Any other suggestions on how to debug this 5x jump in memory usage?
Thanks
Ed W
Robert Cummings
: Re: [PHP] Memory usage very high under AMD64?
Aschwin Wesselius wrote:
Ed W wrote:
RSS is staying approximately constant, ie the memory in use has not
changed much
VSZ, ie virtual memory has increased by more than 2x2=4. If someone
has some hard experience of both platforms then please
Hi
I am trying to figure out expected memory usage of PHP
Under my 32bit install Apache 2 processes are drawing around 45MB
virtual and 25MB RSS. (XCache enabled)
However, under 64bit, same PHP and Apache versions, FastCGI is consuming
around 110MB virt and 25MB RSS. However, Apache2
64 bit integers are twice as big as 32 bit integers.
Cheers,
Rob.
On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 20:16 +0100, Ed W wrote:
Hi
I am trying to figure out expected memory usage of PHP
Under my 32bit install Apache 2 processes are drawing around 45MB
virtual and 25MB RSS. (XCache enabled)
However,
45MB x2 is a lot less than 215MB...
Also, I would expect the actual consumption to be less than 2x since not
all the data will be doubled in size..?
Any other suggestions on how to debug this 5x jump in memory usage?
Thanks
Ed W
Robert Cummings wrote:
64 bit integers are twice as big as
8 matches
Mail list logo