RE: RE: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

> I guess you could call them helper scripts libraries. > > Example would be: You can program a script to create a switch > statement and > then have it prompt you for the number of case statements to > add in and if > you want them to break; or not. > > Things like that. Short cuts if you wil

Re: RE: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

ent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 12:01 PM Subject: RE: RE: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use? Jim Lucas <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thursday, September 25, 2003 11:52 AM said: > I already answered that question two days ago. I didn't ask you to answer it twice so I don&#x

Re: RE: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

ROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 12:00 PM Subject: RE: RE: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use? > > you can create so-called assistants... > > > > You can create a loop that asks in a table how many rows and > > columns do you >

RE: RE: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

Jim Lucas on Thursday, September 25, 2003 11:52 AM said: > I already answered that question two days ago. I didn't ask you to answer it twice so I don't what you're talking about. c, -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http:/

RE: RE: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

> you can create so-called assistants... > > You can create a loop that asks in a table how many rows and > columns do you > want in that table. > > Then you can have it create the table with all your favorite > default table > settings, but while it is generating it, you could have it > promp

Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

TECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 5:12 AM Subject: Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use? > I bet you don't indent your code either. And all white characters are > useless too, they only slow interpreter down. Good coder will understand > this at a glimpse: > if($pos

Re: RE: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

September 23, 2003 10:06 AM Subject: RE: RE: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use? Jim Lucas <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tuesday, September 23, 2003 9:56 AM said: > Plus, one added feature is, is that it will allow you to do internal > scripting. What are you able to do with &

Re[2]: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

Hi, Thursday, September 25, 2003, 10:40:27 PM, you wrote: DM> lmao .. good one. >>From: pete M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use? >>Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 10:59:19 +0100 >> >>I write my code wi

Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

lmao .. good one. From: pete M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use? Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 10:59:19 +0100 I write my code with pencil and paper and then scan it.. Dont need an editor ! John Nichel wrote: I know we've discussed th

Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

HTML or php. But again thats just me. From: Kevin Bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Cesar Cordovez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, PHP-General <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use? Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 13:04:45 -0400 Thanks:) I'll give BBedit a go for a we

Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

o: PHP-General <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use? Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 10:34:33 -0400 FYI- New to this list but have been a php coder for 2 years. I know a lot of you out there are going to groan inwardly, but I use Dreamweaver, mainly because that's what

Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

I like accelerators I just didnt like the price. So I wrote my own, but I havent worked all the bugs out yet. From: Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Curt Zirzow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: PHP-General <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use? Date:

Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

I write my code with pencil and paper and then scan it.. Dont need an editor ! John Nichel wrote: I know we've discussed this numerous times, but I'll chime in again (mainly because I'm bored). By far, I have been totally satisfied with UltraEdit. Lightweight, just about any language you want

Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 01:04:45PM -0400, Kevin Bruce wrote: : : Thanks:) I'll give BBedit a go for a week and let you know how it turns out. : Yes, Dreamweaver does sucketh much, but it's great for hashing out the page : (WYSIWYG style) then tweeking the code. I Hate (capital H) hand typing : nes

Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

I know we've discussed this numerous times, but I'll chime in again (mainly because I'm bored). By far, I have been totally satisfied with UltraEdit. Lightweight, just about any language you want to edit, user configurable syntax highlighting (for those into that), handles UNIX / DOS / Mac fil

Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

The new Dreamweaver is much better than the previous version. I still have not found 'the ideal' editor for me and I use several tools. The one tool that looks like it could become my tool of choice could be eclipse. because you can build custom editors (plugins) for anything you need. Clint

Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

Thanks:) I'll give BBedit a go for a week and let you know how it turns out. Yes, Dreamweaver does sucketh much, but it's great for hashing out the page (WYSIWYG style) then tweeking the code. I Hate (capital H) hand typing nested tables.* :P *Hwat the hell do I need typing for, I'm going to be a

Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

THE best text/code editor in this planet is BBEdit. No questions about it. It is a pitty it only runs on Macs. I have used it to write text, code fortran, pascal, c, c++, html, css and php (among others). It is great, I love it. Kudos to Bare Bones! Great find/replace utility. Incredible ad

Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 10:34:33 -0400 Kevin Bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > FYI- New to this list but have been a php coder for 2 years. > > I know a lot of you out there are going to groan inwardly, but I use > Dreamweaver, mainly because that's what I used since it's inception when I > was writ

Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

FYI- New to this list but have been a php coder for 2 years. I know a lot of you out there are going to groan inwardly, but I use Dreamweaver, mainly because that's what I used since it's inception when I was writing static sites. I use OSX for my writing platform and occasionally use BBedit as we

Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

Jon Haworth wrote: if($pos_params!=false) Assuming it's a boolean, $pos_params is *already* true or false, so testing it like this is pretty much pointless. It makes more sense (and is much more readable IMHO) to do something like this: if ($pos_params) { // something } From the futher reading

Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

* Thus wrote Jon Haworth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Hi, > > > Good coder will understand this at a glimpse: > > [snip horrible code] > > > if($pos_params!=false) um... you rewrote that, his code was: if( $pos_params != false ) > > Assuming it's a boolean, $pos_params is *already* true or false,

Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

Curt Zirzow wrote: cat | realprogrammer | in_a_rush if($p) { $bu = substr( $_GET['o'], 0, $p ); $bup = substr( $_GET['o'], ++$p ); } else { $bu = $_GET['o']; $bup = ''; } This is a real world example of how real programmer in a rush can introduce bugs. Original example did not modify $p (

Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

Hi, > Good coder will understand this at a glimpse: [snip horrible code] > if($pos_params!=false) Assuming it's a boolean, $pos_params is *already* true or false, so testing it like this is pretty much pointless. It makes more sense (and is much more readable IMHO) to do something like this: i

Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

* Thus wrote Robert Cummings ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > *COUGH* *COUGH* EVERY REAL coder knows that you have to use the > following brace style for your code to be accepted into the l33t > hierarchy of [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > if( $pos_params != false ) > { > $back_url = substr( $HTTP_GET_VARS['orig

Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 09:43, Curt Zirzow wrote: > * Thus wrote Didier McGillis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > alot easier for me with the returns and tabs. What I do is I have a script > > that strips out any space, tabs, carriage returns and then moves the code > > into the production environment. B

Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

* Thus wrote Didier McGillis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > alot easier for me with the returns and tabs. What I do is I have a script > that strips out any space, tabs, carriage returns and then moves the code > into the production environment. But really unless you are dealing with In some cases, f

Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

Plus, one added feature is, is that it will allow you to do internal > > scripting. > > > > > > Jim Lucas > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "jeffrey pearson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >

Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

the production environment. But really unless you are dealing with hight traffic sites, your not going to see a difference. From: Marek Kilimajer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Jim Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use? Date: Wed, 24 Se

Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

a free version that does most everything the full priced copy does. Plus, one added feature is, is that it will allow you to do internal scripting. Jim Lucas - Original Message - From: "jeffrey pearson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, Sep

RE: RE: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use? I like NoteTab from www.notetab.com It doesn't do syntax highlighting, but if you need that, then you need to learn to code better. And best of all, there is a free version that does most everything the full priced copy does. Plus, one added feature is,

Re: RE: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

AEdiX - Original Message - From: "jeffrey pearson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 11:59 PM Subject: Re: RE: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use? > I like to use Edit Plus. www.editplus.com > > It has the sy

Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

ROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 10:08 AM Subject: Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use? > On Wednesday 24 September 2003 00:56, Jim Lucas wrote: > > > I like NoteTab from www.notetab.com > > > > It doesn't do syntax highlighting, but if you need that, then

Re: RE: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 10:06 AM Subject: RE: RE: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use? Jim Lucas <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tuesday, September 23, 2003 9:56 AM said: > Plus, one added feature is, is that it will allow you to do internal > scripting. What are you able to do

Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

* Thus wrote Chris W. Parker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Ryan A > on Tuesday, September 23, 2003 11:10 AM said: > > > O holy genius coder, we bow to you, forgive uswhy did we take the > > straight and easy path instead of the rough and true path... > > Because we

RE: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

Ryan A on Tuesday, September 23, 2003 11:10 AM said: > O holy genius coder, we bow to you, forgive uswhy did we take the > straight and easy path instead of the rough and true path... Because we are not ereet. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net

Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

> It doesn't do syntax highlighting, but if you need that, then you need to > learn to code better. O holy genius coder, we bow to you, forgive uswhy did we take the straight and easy path instead of the rough and true path... -Ryan -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) T

RE: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

[snip] > It doesn't do syntax highlighting, but if you need that, then you need to > learn to code better. Does that mean php shouldn't have any error reporting whatsoever, because it encourages bad incompetent coders who rely on being mollycoddled? [/snip] Mollycoddled indeed! I remember when

Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

On Wednesday 24 September 2003 00:56, Jim Lucas wrote: > I like NoteTab from www.notetab.com > > It doesn't do syntax highlighting, but if you need that, then you need to > learn to code better. Does that mean php shouldn't have any error reporting whatsoever, because it encourages bad incompete

RE: RE: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

Jim Lucas on Tuesday, September 23, 2003 9:56 AM said: > Plus, one added feature is, is that it will allow you to do internal > scripting. What are you able to do with "internal scripting"? chris. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe,

Re: RE: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

ernal scripting. Jim Lucas - Original Message - From: "jeffrey pearson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 8:59 AM Subject: Re: RE: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use? > I like to use Edit Plus. www.editplus.com > >

Re: RE: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

, Jan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Monday, September 22, 2003 2:00 am Subject: RE: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use? > well, i like to use dreamweaver mx or textpad with the syntax highlighting > file you additionally have to download. i dunno if there are special "php- > mu

Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

In you php.ini, set error_append_string to "... you loser!" On Monday 22 September 2003 07:56 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >You must either be insane, a genius, or joking. > > Some of the most gifted people in the world are all three! Not that I'm > claiming to be one, but yes I'm all three. :

Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

The Best is the GTK verstion of the classic VI editor (latest VI 6.2 - uses GTK 2 on Linux) and there is also a Windows version. It's the best and you don't have to pay for licenses. http://www.vim.org/index.php Notepad - is very poor. you can not controle tabs spaces, see white space and syntax

Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

>You must either be insane, a genius, or joking. Some of the most gifted people in the world are all three! Not that I'm claiming to be one, but yes I'm all three. :-D > I couldn't imagine writing code without context sensitive highlighting -- there are so many bugs that would be overlooked. - H

Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

> Best PHP Editor on the market: called "Notepad". Written by a tiny little > software dev company called Microsoft. Very nicely written, compared to the rest > of their software. You must either be insane, a genius, or joking. I couldn't imagine writing code without context sensitive highlight

Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 22:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Best PHP Editor on the market: called "Notepad". Written by a tiny little > software dev company called Microsoft. Very nicely written, compared to the rest > of their software. Nh, a slightly larger company named Microsoft Inc. created

Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

Best PHP Editor on the market: called "Notepad". Written by a tiny little software dev company called Microsoft. Very nicely written, compared to the rest of their software.

Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

> PHP eclipse is also nice, you need eclipse from http://www.eclipse.org > and then you install the PHP Eclipse module > http://phpeclipse.sourceforge.net. Very easy to install, I am a big fan > of Komodo, I also like Vim, Kate and Eclipse. I tried Zend Studio 1 and > 2 but it didn't live up

RE: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

Binay on Monday, September 22, 2003 1:58 AM said: > Please suggest me a good PHP editor like ( Microsoft's Interdev for > ASP) to write my php programs/scripts and get a visual feel. Doesn't fit in the "visual feel" category but I really like HTML-Kit available at

Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

erous demos and find what works for you. Edward Dudlik Becoming Digital www.becomingdigital.com wishes | www.amazon.com/o/registry/EGDXEBBWTYUU - Original Message - From: "Ryan A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, 22 September, 2003 05:07 Sub

Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

lik Becoming Digital www.becomingdigital.com wishes | www.amazon.com/o/registry/EGDXEBBWTYUU - Original Message - From: "Ryan A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, 22 September, 2003 05:07 Subject: Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use? Hey Personally I

Re: [PHP] RE : [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

On Monday 22 Sep 2003 11:35, BENARD Jean-philippe wrote: > Not a "php-must-have-editors" but useful ones, for example, are phpEd > and Zend Studio (text completion, functions library, ...). I found that > Zend Studio is a good one because of internal CVS connexions, work on > UNIX & Windows systems

[PHP] RE : [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

a good choice for a professional use. Cordialement, Jean-Philippe BENARD Consultant STERIA Infogérance ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -Message d'origine- De : Ruessel, Jan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : lundi 22 septembre 2003 11:00 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : RE: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to u

Re: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 11:00 AM Subject: RE: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use? well, i like to use dreamweaver mx or textpad with the syntax highlighting file you additionally have to download. i dunno if there are special "php-m

RE: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PHP] PHP Editor - which to use? Hi everybody! Please suggest me a good PHP editor like ( Microsoft's Interdev for ASP) to write my php programs/scripts and get a visual feel. Thanks Binay -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscri

[PHP] PHP Editor - which to use?

Hi everybody! Please suggest me a good PHP editor like ( Microsoft's Interdev for ASP) to write my php programs/scripts and get a visual feel. Thanks Binay