Merlin wrote:
Hi there,
I am doing some image cropping of about 40.000 files with php.
To do this I wrote a PHP file that does what I want and I did disable
the timeout so I can call it via webbrowser and fire the script.
There are two down sides I see:
1. One image takes about 0.25 s,
Jochem Maas wrote:
sorry OP I can't comment on the degradation your seeing, but I'm
interested if anyone can - in the mean time you might consider downgrading
apache
and measuring the difference and subsequently upgrading apache whilst
downgrading php and measuring
the difference also - it
Mathieu Dumoulin wrote:
This is more a How would you do it than a How can i do it question.
Didn't have time to try it, but i want to know how mysql_seek_row acts
with large result sets.
For example im thinking of building a node tree application that can
have dual direction links to nodes
Thx, but that wouldn't work since i can have dual direction nodes and
further something i didnt say is that a node may be used infinite number
of times in the tree... so it isn't really valid to use joins in that
case :(
thx anyway
Barry wrote:
Mathieu Dumoulin wrote:
This is more a How
Rodolfo Andrade wrote:
Hi all!
I would like to know if comments in the code affects the performance. I know
that comments are ignored by the interpreter, but it does increase the file
size, so I was thinking about a possible performance hit for highly
commented files.
Can anyone confirm this?
Barry wrote:
Rodolfo Andrade wrote:
Hi all!
I would like to know if comments in the code affects the performance.
I know
that comments are ignored by the interpreter, but it does increase the
file
size, so I was thinking about a possible performance hit for highly
commented files.
Can
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:09:00 +0100
Jochem Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in real life you won't notice the overhead at all.
and people will love you if you'r files are 90% comments :-)
I've never been quite that liberal with my comments, but I do have a
few files that are 50% comments...
Austin Denyer wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:09:00 +0100
Jochem Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in real life you won't notice the overhead at all.
and people will love you if you'r files are 90% comments :-)
I've never been quite that liberal with my comments, but I do have a
few files that
On Thu, January 19, 2006 7:09 am, Jochem Maas wrote:
Barry wrote:
Rodolfo Andrade wrote:
and people will love you if you'r files are 90% comments :-)
Actually, the times I've seen THAT much commenting, it was generally a
lot of useless noise and I hated it...
Consider this common practice:
I dont think either will give a performance decrease any less than the
other will do.
Anders Norrbring wrote:
I've been spending some time to find performance pros and cons, but so
far haven't had any real luck.
Can someone on this list say which is better than the other, and also
gentilmente comunicazione. Ogni utilizzo improprio è contrario ai principi
del D.lgs 196/03 e alla legislazione Europea (Direttiva 2002/58/CE).
-Messaggio originale-
Da: James Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inviato: lunedì 5 dicembre 2005 13.40
A: php-general@lists.php.net
Oggetto: [PHP] Re
* Rodolfo Gonzalez Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
this could be a silly question. Is there some performance penalty when
using the operator like this:
$var =EOP
add a bunch of text here
and here
EOP;
Just curious.
Try doing some benchmarks using microtime(). My gut reaction is that
there
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:
this could be a silly question. Is there some performance penalty when
using the operator [in heredoc]
Try doing some benchmarks using microtime(). My gut reaction is that
there shouldn't be any difference; heredoc syntax is simply another
GamblerZG wrote:
Are there any decent resources dedicated to PHP code optimization? By
decent I mean ones that do not ask you to completely ruin readability
for the sake of extra 0.003 seconds.
The best way to go about it is to get a code profiler. apd / xdebug /
Zend are popular choices.
--
The best way to go about it is to get a code profiler. apd / xdebug /
Zend are popular choices.
Can't seem to install apd 0.9something or xdebug 1.0.something. pear calls
phpize, which in turn outputs some cryptic message and exits. (In case of APD
it's something like error on line 59. I'm not
They do not do the same thing.
mysql_escape_string() is what you're after, if you're inserting data from user input into an SQL
statement, regardless!
Jed
--
_
(_)___Jed Smith, Code Monkey
| / __| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| \__ \ +1 541 606-4145
_/ |___/
You may find this useful: http://www.hudzilla.org/php/18_1_0.php
Hans H. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm trying to tweak my server a bit and wonder if it is better to have a
large
include file, say 20-40 kb with 15 user-defined functions, of which maybe
3
* Thus wrote Luis Bernardo:
You may find this useful: http://www.hudzilla.org/php/18_1_0.php
paragraphs 2 3 should be deleted. telling someone that optimal
code is acceptable is like saying storing the year in a 2 char
field is perfectly fine.
Curt
--
The above comments may offend you. flame
Hello,
On 09/14/2004 12:22 AM, Kevin Coyner wrote:
I'm working on a website where I'd like to display a thumbnail from a
repository of jpg's of normal (@ 800x600 px) size. Each time a user
comes to this page, I'd like to show a new thumbnail from a different
image in the repository.
Obviously I
Hi John
If you have a large number of Users using this system, your save map for
sessions will grow in space, using some resources
If it's very large pieces of information, i would advise you to store this
info in a database. That's doomed to be more effective.
Eric
John Schulz [EMAIL
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 08:09:57AM -0700, Hardik Doshi wrote:
Hi Group,
Hi Hardik.
I have a question regarding retrieving the
information. I have the functionlity in which on every
user click, system needs to retrieve information for
particular user and display the page according to the
Karel wrote:
I'm having a lot of trouble with loading times...
Let me explain in detail:
I've a full huge coded website based upon a mysql database...
mysql entries: at least 2M
php code: at least 1M lines (longest file about 25k, without includes)
about 2 months ago we resetted the entire
I suggest using a html caching solution. Generate your html once, and store
it
in a file. I like http://0x00.org/php/phpCache/
Mike Fifield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Ok I have a performance question. I run a wallpaper site; this is the url
why not to keep both names and the pictures themselves into a database?
Loggin in is not really that big deal, I think it is worth portability -
you'll be changing this someday (as you get too many requests or too many
pictures to request). Start from now. Performance will not change too much
24 matches
Mail list logo
