Re: [PHP] Re: A new FREE web server can do PHP faster than Apache'smod_php

You should leave an identification tag in your url. This way when people click the link you supplied, you can track where they are coming from LiteSpeed wrote: Hi there! Do you feel the need for speed? Lite Speed Technologies proudly introduces you LiteSpeed Web Server 1.0 LiteSpeed Web

Re: [PHP] Re: A new FREE web server can do PHP faster than Apache'smod_php

Thanks John, that's a good idea. Please visit our website at http://www.litespeedtech.com/index.html?php-general Thanks, LiteSpeed John Manko wrote: You should leave an identification tag in your url. This way when people click the link you supplied, you can track where they are coming

Re: [PHP] Re: A new FREE web server can do PHP faster than Apache'smod_php

Thanks Mark, that's good idea. Please visit our website at http://www.litespeedtech.com/index.html?php-general Thanks, LiteSpeed Mark wrote: Yes I am. Apache 2 is not considered safe with PHP, and Apache 1.3x is missing some features I'd like... And IIS... well don't get me started with IIS. I

Re: [PHP] Re: A new FREE web server can do PHP faster than Apache'smod_php

Mark, When you say Apache 1.3x is missing some features, do you mean on Windows or on all systems? I wonder what it is? Thanks, LiteSpeed Mark wrote: Yes I am. Apache 2 is not considered safe with PHP, and Apache 1.3x is missing some features I'd like... And IIS... well don't get me started

Re: [PHP] Re: A new FREE web server can do PHP faster than Apache'smod_php

Thank you, Mark, Apache 2.0 is a better choice to windows users we believe too. Do you really think web server's built-in authentication features are useful and important? I think they are very limited and lacking flexibility. We have to use PHP's for our web admin interface and skip the web