On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:14:34 +, David Powers wrote:
A Google check on my email address shows that, with one exception, it
has been released into the public domain solely through archives and
mirrors of this list. The exception is a private group, whose
administrator I have alerted to
On Sat, January 19, 2008 12:51 pm, Per Jessen wrote:
David Powers wrote:
When I subscribed to the PHP general mailing list I did not give
permission for this. This is an international list, and what you're
doing breaks EU privacy laws, and possibly those in other countries
too.
Hmm, I'm not
Richard Lynch wrote:
You'll also have a VERY tough time trying to ram EU privacy laws
through a non-EU court, if Dan is not in the EU...
Forcing American law on other people of the world has not been a problem
for America, why should it be a problem for the EU? :-(
You *know* it's an
2008. 01. 19, szombat keltezéssel 11.12-kor Daniel Brown ezt írta:
Aside from that, Zoltan, if you happen to be able to find the
function to post without much problem, feel free, and I'll look into
incorporating it into the script. Otherwise, I can fix it myself. My
fault for not
Nathan Nobbe wrote:
i didnt see the option in gmail; but if you know where it is or how to
set it up in gmail, i will happily take the 2 seconds to enable it.
Sorry, I don't use gmail.
/Per Jessen, Zürich
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit:
On Jan 19, 2008 9:39 PM, Nathan Nobbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 19, 2008 9:25 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, at least we know which subject will make it to the top next
week
nice; say, dan, here comes another feature request; can we see the top
thread
On Jan 20, 2008, at 10:04 AM, Daniel Brown wrote:
On Jan 19, 2008 9:39 PM, Nathan Nobbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 19, 2008 9:25 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Well, at least we know which subject will make it to the top next
week
nice; say, dan, here comes
Andrés Robinet wrote:
3 - I don't like the attitude of both Dan and David. IMHO, David thinks the issue is more severe
than it is, and Dan just won't recognize that mangling email addresses is kind of a (arguably also)
standard practice. No public apologize is needed, but maybe Yeah, I just
On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 10:04 -0500, Daniel Brown wrote:
That would actually be pretty interesting. Since we've all been
known to beat a thread to death, it certainly wouldn't be difficult to
collect the data.
FWIW, I would like to continue to see these postings, as mailing list
metrics
On 20 Jan 2008, at 17:49, David Powers wrote:
Andrés Robinet wrote:
3 - I don't like the attitude of both Dan and David. IMHO, David
thinks the issue is more severe than it is, and Dan just won't
recognize that mangling email addresses is kind of a (arguably
also) standard practice. No
Stut wrote:
You seem unable to accept that you are the one that put your email
address out there for anyone to collect. If you can't understand that
then there is indeed no point in continuing the conversation.
I do understand it. What I object to is a supposedly responsible member
of this
On 20 Jan 2008, at 18:02, David Powers wrote:
Stut wrote:
You seem unable to accept that you are the one that put your email
address out there for anyone to collect. If you can't understand
that then there is indeed no point in continuing the conversation.
I do understand it. What I object
On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 18:02 +, David Powers wrote:
Stut wrote:
You seem unable to accept that you are the one that put your email
address out there for anyone to collect. If you can't understand that
then there is indeed no point in continuing the conversation.
I do understand it.
Robert Cummings wrote:
I understand what you are thinking, but the fact
remains your address is already public for having posted to the list. It
seems you are getting bent out of shape because you aren't grasping this
fact. Dan hasn't done anything wrong nor does he owe any apologies or
have you ever googled for [EMAIL PROTECTED] ?
looks like it brings up some thread from around
september of 07... oh wait; isnt that before dan
started up the stat program ..
-nathan
On Sunday 20 January 2008 22:06:54 Nathan Nobbe wrote:
have you ever googled for [EMAIL PROTECTED] ?
looks like it brings up some thread from around
september of 07... oh wait; isnt that before dan
started up the stat program ..
-nathan
MAN don't expose it like that. Now he'll get tons
On Sunday 20 January 2008 19:58:03 David Powers wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
I understand what you are thinking, but the fact
remains your address is already public for having posted to the list. It
seems you are getting bent out of shape because you aren't grasping this
fact. Dan hasn't
On Jan 20, 2008 4:09 PM, Børge Holen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MAN don't expose it like that. Now he'll get tons upon tons of spam :D
damn, did i, like, just publish it again :-O
-nathan
On Sunday 20 January 2008 22:38:24 Robert Cummings wrote:
On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 16:13 -0500, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
On Jan 20, 2008 4:09 PM, Børge Holen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MAN don't expose it like that. Now he'll get tons upon tons of spam :D
damn, did i, like, just publish it again
On Jan 20, 2008 4:38 PM, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 16:13 -0500, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
On Jan 20, 2008 4:09 PM, Børge Holen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MAN don't expose it like that. Now he'll get tons upon tons of spam :D
damn, did i, like, just
On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 16:13 -0500, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
On Jan 20, 2008 4:09 PM, Børge Holen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MAN don't expose it like that. Now he'll get tons upon tons of spam :D
damn, did i, like, just publish it again :-O
Is this going to turn into one of those things like
Børge Holen wrote:
You really don't get it yet? You distributed it, I knew your email long before
Dan did squat, didn't take any programming to acomplish that.
Obviously, you don't get it either. It's now common practice to remove
email addresses from public forums. Instead of justifying
PostTrack [Dan Brown] wrote:
Posting Summary for PHP-General List
Thanks a bundle, Dan, for publicizing everyone's email address. All the
addresses are in plain text, even on the news server web interface ready
for spambots to harvest.
--
David Powers
--
PHP General Mailing List
David Powers schreef:
PostTrack [Dan Brown] wrote:
Posting Summary for PHP-General List
Thanks a bundle, Dan, for publicizing everyone's email address. All the
addresses are in plain text, even on the news server web interface ready
for spambots to harvest.
that horse had bolted long
On Jan 19, 2008 8:39 AM, David Powers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PostTrack [Dan Brown] wrote:
Posting Summary for PHP-General List
Thanks a bundle, Dan, for publicizing everyone's email address. All the
addresses are in plain text, even on the news server web interface ready
for
i think the script is pretty cool, dan ;)
-nathan
On Sat, January 19, 2008 7:39 am, David Powers wrote:
PostTrack [Dan Brown] wrote:
Posting Summary for PHP-General List
Thanks a bundle, Dan, for publicizing everyone's email address. All
the
addresses are in plain text, even on the news server web interface
ready
for spambots to
Daniel Brown wrote:
My pleasure, David but before you start sounding *completely*
victimized and pointing the finger, you may want to think about the
fact that your email address is already plain text on some of the
archive sites --- including MARC. Just go to Google and type in your
On Jan 19, 2008 12:30 PM, David Powers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel Brown wrote:
My pleasure, David but before you start sounding *completely*
victimized and pointing the finger, you may want to think about the
fact that your email address is already plain text on some of the
$email = str_replace(array('@', '.'), array(' AT ', ' DOT ', $email);
This will defeat 99.% of spambots, and still be quite usable for
any legitimate purpose.
On Sat, January 19, 2008 12:36 pm, David Powers wrote:
Daniel Brown wrote:
On Jan 19, 2008 12:30 PM, David Powers wrote:
Yes, and
Daniel Brown wrote:
On Jan 19, 2008 12:30 PM, David Powers wrote:
Yes, and it's obvious how that happens. It's because people, including
yourself, don't have the courtesy to set up your email or newreader
program to remove the sender's address from replies.
By removing the email
On 19 Jan 2008, at 18:36, David Powers wrote:
Point 2: My address has been exposed by the thoughtless acts of
others not setting their mail program/newsreader options correctly.
Apart from the ex-BBC forum (where I have since changed the settings
and edited the relevant post), all Google
David Powers wrote:
I wasn't referring to that, but to the thoughtless way that you and
others automatically include the sender's email address in plain text
every time you respond to a post. Surely it's not too much to ask that
you set your mail program or newsreader so that it doesn't
Nathan Nobbe wrote:
On Jan 19, 2008 1:47 PM, Richard Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
regarding configuring mail clients to omit the senders address in the
reply, well, this is one of those things that you just cant expect
every user to do.
Not even you? (see above)
/Per Jessen,
On Jan 19, 2008 1:36 PM, David Powers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel Brown wrote:
On Jan 19, 2008 12:30 PM, David Powers wrote:
Yes, and it's obvious how that happens. It's because people, including
yourself, don't have the courtesy to set up your email or newreader
program to remove
On Jan 19, 2008 1:47 PM, Richard Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$email = str_replace(array('@', '.'), array(' AT ', ' DOT ', $email);
This will defeat 99.% of spambots, and still be quite usable for
any legitimate purpose.
this is a great idea; and its the same concept employed for
On Jan 19, 2008 1:47 PM, Richard Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$email = str_replace(array('@', '.'), array(' AT ', ' DOT ', $email);
This will defeat 99.% of spambots, and still be quite usable for
any legitimate purpose.
Yes, actually, I've already incorporated something like that
On Jan 19, 2008 2:06 PM, Per Jessen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nathan Nobbe wrote:
On Jan 19, 2008 1:47 PM, Richard Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
regarding configuring mail clients to omit the senders address in the
reply, well, this is one of those things that you just cant
Daniel Brown wrote:
Finally, I don't want you to think that I'm personally-attacking
you in the same way you did to me
Sorry, Dan, you just don't get it, do you? You published the name and
email address of every single person who contributed to this mailing
list in the past week. I
On Jan 19, 2008 5:25 PM, David Powers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel Brown wrote:
Finally, I don't want you to think that I'm personally-attacking
you in the same way you did to me
Sorry, Dan, you just don't get it, do you? You published the name and
email address of every single
Daniel Brown wrote:
Notice, if you will and are able, that all other posts to this
thread are responses of interest, not the ramblings of a crybaby.
I have also noticed that many of the responses come from #1 Rated
Year's Coolest Guy By Self. A little humility might be in order.
I done
David Powers schreef:
Daniel Brown wrote:
Finally, I don't want you to think that I'm personally-attacking
you in the same way you did to me
Sorry, Dan, you just don't get it, do you?
good mantra - please repeat to yourself 20 times every morning whilst
you brush your teeth. actually I
Jochem Maas wrote:
if I am correct you are or were a journalist. forgive if I have mistaken
you
for another, but if that is correct then how often have you trodden on
someone's
privacy for the sake of a story?
Yes, I was a journalist for some 30 years, but roughly two-thirds of
that time
David Powers schreef:
Jochem Maas wrote:
if I am correct you are or were a journalist. forgive if I have
mistaken you
for another, but if that is correct then how often have you trodden on
someone's
privacy for the sake of a story?
Yes, I was a journalist for some 30 years, but roughly
-Original Message-
From: David Powers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2008 10:22 PM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: Posting Summary for Week Ending 18 January,
2008: php-general@lists.php.net
Jochem Maas wrote:
if I am correct you
David Powers wrote:
Daniel Brown wrote:
Notice, if you will and are able, that all other posts to this
thread are responses of interest, not the ramblings of a crybaby.
I have also noticed that many of the responses come from #1 Rated
Year's Coolest Guy By Self. A little humility might
On Jan 19, 2008 8:15 PM, Andrés Robinet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2 - I don't have anything against my name and email being published in the
stats (sure, I'd like support for the é character on my name :)). I don't
care about spam either, we all get spam anyway, and that's why we have RBLs
On Jan 19, 2008 8:55 PM, Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Powers wrote:
Daniel Brown wrote:
Notice, if you will and are able, that all other posts to this
thread are responses of interest, not the ramblings of a crybaby.
I have also noticed that many of the responses come from #1
Daniel Brown wrote:
On Jan 19, 2008 8:55 PM, Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Powers wrote:
Daniel Brown wrote:
Notice, if you will and are able, that all other posts to this
thread are responses of interest, not the ramblings of a crybaby.
I have also noticed that many of the
Well, at least we know which subject will make it to the top next
week
--
H | It's not a bug - it's an undocumented feature.
+
Ashley M. Kirchner mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 303.442.6410 x130
IT Director /
On Jan 19, 2008 9:25 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, at least we know which subject will make it to the top next
week
nice; say, dan, here comes another feature request; can we see the top
thread
(or 3 :)) as well ?
-nathan
51 matches
Mail list logo
