> I'm still a little confused on this though. How would a browser send
> this to notify of a download that was only partially completed before?
As I understand it, it was more of a "partially cached" document issue.
If the browser has the first N bytes of a document in its cache, it will se
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Hello Eric,
Am 2009-01-04 14:33:37, schrieb Eric Butera:
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Michelle Konzack
wrote:
[ '/usr/share/tdphp-vserver/includes/02_functions.inc' ]
function fncPushBinary($type='show', $file, $mime='') {
$BUFFER=1024;
Hello Eric,
Am 2009-01-04 14:33:37, schrieb Eric Butera:
> On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Michelle Konzack
> wrote:
> > [ '/usr/share/tdphp-vserver/includes/02_functions.inc' ]
> > function fncPushBinary($type='show', $file, $mime='') {
> >
> >$BUFFER=1024;
> >
> >
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 1:23 AM, Ashley Sheridan
wrote:
> I'm still a little confused on this though. How would a browser send
> this to notify of a download that was only partially completed before?
I use it to process information from a POST that a Google Gears based
uploader sends.
--
PHP Ge
On Sat, 2009-01-03 at 23:41 -0800, mike wrote:
> I actually use $_SERVER['HTTP_CONTENT_RANGE'] in my setup (nginx +
> php-fpm) - I don't think I get an 'HTTP_RANGE' ...
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 9:52 PM, Lars Torben Wilson
> wrote:
> > 2009/1/3 Ashley Sheridan :
> >> On Sat, 2009-01-03 at
I actually use $_SERVER['HTTP_CONTENT_RANGE'] in my setup (nginx +
php-fpm) - I don't think I get an 'HTTP_RANGE' ...
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 9:52 PM, Lars Torben Wilson wrote:
> 2009/1/3 Ashley Sheridan :
>> On Sat, 2009-01-03 at 17:39 -0500, Eric Butera wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 5:19 P
2009/1/3 Ashley Sheridan :
> On Sat, 2009-01-03 at 17:39 -0500, Eric Butera wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Michelle Konzack
>> wrote:
>> > Am 2009-01-03 10:16:43, schrieb Eric Butera:
>> >> On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Ashley Sheridan
>> >> > I don't think this is actually possible.
On Sat, 2009-01-03 at 17:39 -0500, Eric Butera wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Michelle Konzack
> wrote:
> > Am 2009-01-03 10:16:43, schrieb Eric Butera:
> >> On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Ashley Sheridan
> >> > I don't think this is actually possible. I've never seen it happen
> >> > b
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Michelle Konzack
wrote:
> Am 2009-01-03 10:16:43, schrieb Eric Butera:
>> On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Ashley Sheridan
>> > I don't think this is actually possible. I've never seen it happen
>> > before. It would need some sort of dedicated client-side software t
Am 2009-01-03 10:16:43, schrieb Eric Butera:
> On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Ashley Sheridan
> > I don't think this is actually possible. I've never seen it happen
> > before. It would need some sort of dedicated client-side software to
> > recognise exactly how much has been downloaded and then
10 matches
Mail list logo
