On Thu, 2003-10-02 at 01:57, Manuel Lemos wrote:
I suppose that you missed the point that the class provides you to do
both client side and server side validation in cases that it is possible.
[--CROPPED--]
I don't think that hardware speed will make the Internet connections any
--- Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Personally I find Javascript validation intrusive and ugly. It
decreases my experience and IMHO makes the site less usable *grin*.
I was going to say the same thing. :-)
There are definitely benefits to saving the extra request and response
Chris Shiflett mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Wednesday, October 01, 2003 11:18 PM said:
There are definitely benefits to saving the extra request and response
necessary to properly display errors, but I'm not so sure I would
count usability as one of them. In addition, the user's perception
Heeey, a great little response like this to see an alternative
to a popup and no link for us to check it out *pffft* Where'd
you learn your posting manners? Were you brought up in a web barn?
*grin*. Wouldn't happen to know the URL still would ya?
Cheers,
Rob.
On Thu, 2003-10-02
--- Chris W. Parker wrote:
I went to an ecom site today that used js validation but in a very
slick way. There were no popups to be seen. Instead, when I tried to
add a product to my cart without specifying some attributes a little
red message magically appeared on the page that said Please
* Thus wrote Chris Shiflett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
--- Chris W. Parker wrote:
I went to an ecom site today that used js validation but in a very
slick way. There were no popups to be seen. Instead, when I tried to
add a product to my cart without specifying some attributes a little
red
On Thu, 2003-10-02 at 16:19, Curt Zirzow wrote:
The only draw back is the javascript becomes bloated because of all
the different browser conditions. Is it IE, NS, Opera, other? and
what version are they? Which is the nice thing about handling
server side, no need to worry about browser
Robert Cummings mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Thursday, October 02, 2003 12:15 PM said:
Heeey, a great little response like this to see an alternative
to a popup and no link for us to check it out *pffft* Where'd
you learn your posting manners? Were you brought up in a web
on 10/2/03 2:05 PM, Chris W. Parker at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Cummings mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Thursday, October 02, 2003 12:15 PM said:
Heeey, a great little response like this to see an alternative
to a popup and no link for us to check it out *pffft*
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: your method for validating forms
Date: Thursday 02 October 2003 06:46 pm
From: Fred T Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Richard Baskett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actually if you need client side javascript form validation the qForms API
just
Hello,
On 10/01/2003 08:43 PM, Chris W. Parker wrote:
$_SESSION['form_errors'] = validateFormData($formdata);
redirect(to_the_previous_page.php);
You may want to study how this classic form validation and generation
class works. It generates the necessary Javascript to validate on the
client
On Wed, 2003-10-01 at 20:26, Manuel Lemos wrote:
Hello,
On 10/01/2003 08:43 PM, Chris W. Parker wrote:
$_SESSION['form_errors'] = validateFormData($formdata);
redirect(to_the_previous_page.php);
You may want to study how this classic form validation and generation
class works.
Hello,
On 10/02/2003 12:14 AM, Brad Pauly wrote:
$_SESSION['form_errors'] = validateFormData($formdata);
redirect(to_the_previous_page.php);
You may want to study how this classic form validation and generation
class works. It generates the necessary Javascript to validate on the
client side
13 matches
Mail list logo
