This will be my last post on this thread of discussion.
Thanks to all who replied, I have it figured out.
I guess my only problem with the way the !== and === operators work in this
situation is this:
Logic dictates that if something evaluates to NOT FALSE it must be TRUE.
Regardless of the
On 17 November 2006 09:55, Michael wrote:
This will be my last post on this thread of discussion.
Thanks to all who replied, I have it figured out.
I guess my only problem with the way the !== and ===
operators work in this situation is this:
Logic dictates that if something evaluates
To: Michael
Cc: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: RE: [PHP] odd behavior of stripos() with === operator *LAST POST*
On 17 November 2006 09:55, Michael wrote:
This will be my last post on this thread of discussion.
Thanks to all who replied, I have it figured out.
I guess my only problem
On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 02:54 -0700, Michael wrote:
This will be my last post on this thread of discussion.
Thanks to all who replied, I have it figured out.
I guess my only problem with the way the !== and === operators work in this
situation is this:
Logic dictates that if something
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 02:54 -0700, Michael wrote:
This will be my last post on this thread of discussion.
Thanks to all who replied, I have it figured out.
I guess my only problem with the way the !== and === operators work in this
situation is this:
Logic dictates
On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 17:29 +0100, Jochem Maas wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 02:54 -0700, Michael wrote:
This will be my last post on this thread of discussion.
Thanks to all who replied, I have it figured out.
I guess my only problem with the way the !== and ===
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 17:29 +0100, Jochem Maas wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 02:54 -0700, Michael wrote:
This will be my last post on this thread of discussion.
Thanks to all who replied, I have it figured out.
I guess my only problem with the
At 2:54 AM -0700 11/17/06, Michael wrote:
Logic dictates that if something evaluates to NOT FALSE it must be TRUE.
Regardless of the type, regardless of the species, breed, flavor etc.
Not true -- it depends upon your reference/environment.
For example, NULL is neither true nor false in
Ok, just to shut you all up, I managed to convince the OP earlier today,
but it never made it to the list...
Michael wrote:
At 02:58 AM 11/17/2006 , Stut wrote:
Michael wrote:
This will be my last post on this thread of discussion.
Thanks to all who replied, I have it figured out.
On 17 November 2006 16:50, Stut wrote:
Your basic misunderstanding is that === is the opposite of !==
which it's not.
Complete rubbish -- it so absolutely is!
If $a===$b, then !($a===$b) is the same as $a!==$b, QED.
(INTEGER === true) will always be false because the types
10 matches
Mail list logo