I give up. trying to reply to messages on this list is tedious. I can't
pinpoint whether it's because the list is set up to make replies go to
the OP or the OP has his reply-to in his mail client set, or most people
are hitting the reply-to button instead of simply reply.
It just doesn't make
The reply-to header should be changed to php-gene...@lists.php.net.
I experience many dev list that are configured this way.
So, in my gmail i change my habit to press a instead of r.
Shiplu Mokaddim
My talks, http://talk.cmyweb.net
Follow me, http://twitter.com/shiplu
SUST Programmers,
David McGlone wrote:
I give up. trying to reply to messages on this list is tedious. I
can't pinpoint whether it's because the list is set up to make replies
go to the OP or the OP has his reply-to in his mail client set, or
most people are hitting the reply-to button instead of simply reply.
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 14:27, David McGlone da...@dmcentral.net wrote:
I give up. trying to reply to messages on this list is tedious. I can't
pinpoint whether it's because the list is set up to make replies go to
the OP or the OP has his reply-to in his mail client set, or most people
are
Why change the way that has been around for years and adopted by
multiple e-mail lists?
It feels like it's more problem to change the way for thousands of
users just to satisfy a couple of few.
**
Hans Åhlin
Tel: +46761488019
On 21 April 2010 14:38, Hans Åhlin ahlin.h...@kronan-net.com wrote:
Why change the way that has been around for years and adopted by
multiple e-mail lists?
It feels like it's more problem to change the way for thousands of
users just to satisfy a couple of few.
David was venting based on a
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 14:42 +0200, Daniel Egeberg wrote:
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 14:27, David McGlone da...@dmcentral.net wrote:
I give up. trying to reply to messages on this list is tedious. I can't
pinpoint whether it's because the list is set up to make replies go to
the OP or the OP
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 14:49 +0200, Peter Lind wrote:
On 21 April 2010 14:38, Hans Åhlin ahlin.h...@kronan-net.com wrote:
Why change the way that has been around for years and adopted by
multiple e-mail lists?
It feels like it's more problem to change the way for thousands of
users just
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 14:49 +0200, Peter Lind wrote:
On 21 April 2010 14:38, Hans Åhlin ahlin.h...@kronan-net.com wrote:
Why change the way that has been around for years and adopted by
multiple e-mail lists?
It feels like it's more problem to change the way for thousands of
users just to
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 08:56 -0400, David McGlone wrote:
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 14:42 +0200, Daniel Egeberg wrote:
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 14:27, David McGlone da...@dmcentral.net wrote:
I give up. trying to reply to messages on this list is tedious. I can't
pinpoint whether it's because
David McGlone wrote:
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 14:49 +0200, Peter Lind wrote:
On 21 April 2010 14:38, Hans Åhlin ahlin.h...@kronan-net.com wrote:
Why change the way that has been around for years and adopted by
multiple e-mail lists?
It feels like it's more problem to change the way for thousands
Daniel Egeberg wrote:
Then get a better email client if yours doesn't support reply to all
or reply to group. It's hardly the mailing list's fault that your
client doesn't support that.
Nonsense. I have used lists like this for many, many years. PHP lists
are the only ones I have ever used
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 13:56 +0100, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 08:56 -0400, David McGlone wrote:
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 14:42 +0200, Daniel Egeberg wrote:
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 14:27, David McGlone da...@dmcentral.net wrote:
I give up. trying to reply to messages on
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 09:19 -0400, Robert Cummings wrote:
David McGlone wrote:
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 14:49 +0200, Peter Lind wrote:
On 21 April 2010 14:38, Hans Åhlin ahlin.h...@kronan-net.com wrote:
Why change the way that has been around for years and adopted by
multiple e-mail lists?
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 9:33 AM, David McGlone da...@dmcentral.net wrote:
I'm not passing judgment, It just saddens me that I have to send
multiple messages and this isn't because of anyone, it's because of my
lack of knowledge on how to reply to lists that are set up in this way.
But I think
On 21 April 2010 15:41, Dan Joseph dmjos...@gmail.com wrote:
When you hit reply all, just take out all the other addresses and leave the
list one in there. The list was setup like this years ago on purpose, and
they've stated in the past they don't want to change it..
And waste time every
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 09:41, Dan Joseph dmjos...@gmail.com wrote:
When you hit reply all, just take out all the other addresses and leave the
list one in there. The list was setup like this years ago on purpose, and
they've stated in the past they don't want to change it..
And we
Peter Lind wrote:
On 21 April 2010 15:41, Dan Joseph dmjos...@gmail.com wrote:
When you hit reply all, just take out all the other addresses and leave the
list one in there. The list was setup like this years ago on purpose, and
they've stated in the past they don't want to change it..
And
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 09:41 -0400, Dan Joseph wrote:
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 9:33 AM, David McGlone da...@dmcentral.net wrote:
I'm not passing judgment, It just saddens me that I have to send
multiple messages and this isn't because of anyone, it's because of my
lack of knowledge on how
2010/4/21 David McGlone da...@dmcentral.net:
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 14:49 +0200, Peter Lind wrote:
On 21 April 2010 14:38, Hans Åhlin ahlin.h...@kronan-net.com wrote:
Why change the way that has been around for years and adopted by
multiple e-mail lists?
It feels like it's more problem to
2010/4/21 David McGlone da...@dmcentral.net:
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 14:49 +0200, Peter Lind wrote:
On 21 April 2010 14:38, Hans Åhlin ahlin.h...@kronan-net.com wrote:
Why change the way that has been around for years and adopted by
multiple e-mail lists?
It feels like it's more problem to
On 21 April 2010 14:56, Ashley Sheridan a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk wrote:
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 08:56 -0400, David McGlone wrote:
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 14:42 +0200, Daniel Egeberg wrote:
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 14:27, David McGlone da...@dmcentral.net wrote:
I give up. trying to reply to
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 16:12 +0200, Hans Åhlin wrote:
2010/4/21 David McGlone da...@dmcentral.net:
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 14:49 +0200, Peter Lind wrote:
On 21 April 2010 14:38, Hans Åhlin ahlin.h...@kronan-net.com wrote:
Why change the way that has been around for years and adopted by
I'm sure that the reason why the this list and a few others are setup this way
so that if anyone want to reply just to the OP can do so without having to
figure out or remembering the e-mail address of the sender.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit:
On 21 April 2010 15:41, Dan Joseph dmjos...@gmail.com wrote:
When you hit reply all, just take out all the other addresses and leave the
list one in there. The list was setup like this years ago on purpose, and
they've stated in the past they don't want to change it..
--
-Dan Joseph
I'd
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 16:12, Hans Åhlin ahlin.h...@kronan-net.com wrote:
2010/4/21 David McGlone da...@dmcentral.net:
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 14:49 +0200, Peter Lind wrote:
On 21 April 2010 14:38, Hans Åhlin ahlin.h...@kronan-net.com wrote:
Why change the way that has been around for years
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 16:32, Tommy Pham tommy...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm sure that the reason why the this list and a few others are setup this
way so that if anyone want to reply just to the OP can do so without having
to figure out or remembering the e-mail address of the sender.
Yes, plus
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:20, David McGlone da...@dmcentral.net wrote:
I just received 3 copies of this message. One went to my PHP folder and
2 went to my Inbox.
It was sent multiple times. Probably an intentional demonstration
of irony. ;-P
--
/Daniel P. Brown
-Original Message-
From: daniel.egeb...@gmail.com [mailto:daniel.egeb...@gmail.com] On
Behalf Of Daniel Egeberg
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 7:40 AM
To: Tommy Pham
Cc: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] replying to list (I give up)
snip
I'm using gmail's label which
David McGlone wrote:
Also, I do not want this discussion to turn into a flame war or
anything of such. I am simply just trying to have a discussion and
learn why and how there is different behavior here, but not anywhere
else.
David, the PHP list behaves like hundreds or thousands of others
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 17:07 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
David McGlone wrote:
Also, I do not want this discussion to turn into a flame war or
anything of such. I am simply just trying to have a discussion and
learn why and how there is different behavior here, but not anywhere
else.
At 8:27 AM -0400 4/21/10, David McGlone wrote:
I give up. trying to reply to messages on this list is tedious. I can't
pinpoint whether it's because the list is set up to make replies go to
the OP or the OP has his reply-to in his mail client set, or most people
are hitting the reply-to button
David McGlone wrote:
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 17:07 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
David McGlone wrote:
Also, I do not want this discussion to turn into a flame war or
anything of such. I am simply just trying to have a discussion and
learn why and how there is different behavior here, but not
33 matches
Mail list logo
