Why would Microsoft be using Solaris, or Linux even? (hint, the same
reason -- their stuff works less good).
Do you know for a fact that they do? If so, how? That'd be a very cool
tidbit of information to share . . .
Yep it is (was) true. We used to laugh about it at work. (We were in
Frank Joerdens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(the context is Microsoft using other OSs)
Do you know for a fact that they do? If so, how? That'd be a very cool
tidbit of information to share . . .
See also:
http://www.unix-vs-nt.org/kirch/
A good document to hit clients/funders/bosses over the
There are no restrictions on that. In fact the license on PHP is
explicitly not the GPL for this very purpose.
As for restricting the demo. I would suggest restricting it via a
license. Any serious customer is not going to violate a license in order
to save a couple of hundred bucks.
-Rasmus
-
From: Rasmus Lerdorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 11:33 AM
To: Shane McBride
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PHP] Ethics question...
There are no restrictions on that. In fact the license on PHP is
explicitly not the GPL for this very purpose.
As for r
Soo true.
But why would Microsoft be using PHP? =D
Why would Microsoft be using Solaris, or Linux even? (hint, the same
reason -- their stuff works less good).
:)
Jeremy Brand :: Sr. Software Engineer :: 408-245-9058 :: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
a customer like Microsoft, Morgan-Stanley, Amazon.com.. yes, but a new
start-up that thinks: "when we'll grow we'll buy something cooler" will
crack your soft down (or will ignore your license) ... I've seen it
happening so many times...
So what? They'll do that anyway unless you spend a
-
From: Rasmus Lerdorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 12:09 PM
To: Maxim Maletsky
Cc: Shane McBride; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [PHP] Ethics question...
a customer like Microsoft, Morgan-Stanley, Amazon.com.. yes, but a new
start-up that thinks: "when
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001 20:59:41 -0600, "Scott Gerhardt"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If your client paid you to develop the E-Commerce system they would
typically own all rights to it unless otherwise agreed upon.
I don't know what country you are speaking of, but in the U.S., that
view is a commonly
What Egan wrote is very true. I speak with some knowledge -- having
weathered a copyright violation suit based on the action of one of my
employees -- and if you write it (as anything other than an employee) then
you own it, 'it' being the source code and the program compiled from that
source
compiler comes out you wont have a way to safely distribute the code
hack proof (Read: less hackable =:) )
-Original Message-
From: Shane McBride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 9:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PHP] Ethics question...
Wow, I
On Thu, 18 Jan 2001 01:56:18 -0500, Les Neste
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What Egan wrote is very true. I speak with some knowledge -- having
weathered a copyright violation suit based on the action of one of my
employees -- and if you write it (as anything other than an employee) then
you own it,
On Thu, 18 Jan 2001 02:45:01 -0500, "Romulo Roberto Pereira"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Copyright? This do not exist!!! See the case of NAPSTER
The law is one thing. Whether people obey it or not, is another.
Egan
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
At 02:50 AM 1/18/2001 -0500, Egan wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jan 2001 02:45:01 -0500, "Romulo Roberto Pereira"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Copyright? This do not exist!!! See the case of NAPSTER
The law is one thing. Whether people obey it or not, is another.
I agree. I would also say that the law is
13 matches
Mail list logo
