Michiel Sikma wrote:
On 24 April 2010 16:14, Per Jessen p...@computer.org wrote:
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
Is there an actual WoW client for Linux or you run in Wine like
environment?
Thanks,
Tommy
I run it under Wine. Wine has come a long way since my first
encounters with
On 25 April 2010 09:31, Per Jessen p...@computer.org wrote:
Doesn't WoW need DirectX and all that? I have some old Windows games
(Diablo, Alpha Centauri, Railroad Tycoon, Wolfenstein) I'd love to
play under Wine, but so far I've not managed to make them work.
The best way to run old
On 23 April 2010 16:16, Kevin Kinsey k...@daleco.biz wrote:
I've still got a Win98 box in service somewhere around here; I use
it for audio recording. Someone (possibly even me) renamed most
of the desktop icons ... OE's shortcut is Outluck Depress. :-)
Kevin D. Kinsey
Say what you will
On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 15:44 +0200, Michiel Sikma wrote:
On 23 April 2010 16:16, Kevin Kinsey k...@daleco.biz wrote:
I've still got a Win98 box in service somewhere around here; I use
it for audio recording. Someone (possibly even me) renamed most
of the desktop icons ... OE's shortcut
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
Is there an actual WoW client for Linux or you run in Wine like
environment?
Thanks,
Tommy
I run it under Wine. Wine has come a long way since my first
encounters with it a few years back and run a surprising amount of
Windows-based software.
Doesn't WoW
On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 16:14 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
Is there an actual WoW client for Linux or you run in Wine like
environment?
Thanks,
Tommy
I run it under Wine. Wine has come a long way since my first
encounters with it a few years back and
On 24 April 2010 16:14, Per Jessen p...@computer.org wrote:
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
Is there an actual WoW client for Linux or you run in Wine like
environment?
Thanks,
Tommy
I run it under Wine. Wine has come a long way since my first
encounters with it a few years back and
Bobby Pejman wrote:
I must say, I never heard or even thought of the idea of calling it
LookOut. Hahaha. It made me laugh for a good 10 minutes and
if that term is open source, I will be using it ;)
I've still got a Win98 box in service somewhere around here; I use
it for audio recording.
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 09:16 -0500, Kevin Kinsey wrote:
I've still got a Win98 box in service somewhere
My commiserations to you, I used that for a couple of years.
I suppose it could be worse though. It might have been WinME or Vista.
Thanks,
Ash
http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk
At 5:06 PM +0100 4/23/10, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 09:16 -0500, Kevin Kinsey wrote:
I've still got a Win98 box in service somewhere
My commiserations to you, I used that for a couple of years.
I suppose it could be worse though. It might have been WinME or Vista.
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 13:24 -0400, tedd wrote:
At 5:06 PM +0100 4/23/10, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 09:16 -0500, Kevin Kinsey wrote:
I've still got a Win98 box in service somewhere
My commiserations to you, I used that for a couple of years.
I suppose it could be
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 13:20, Ashley Sheridan a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk
wrote:
I have heard good things about Windows 7, but I've not used it myself
yet (and don't really plan to)
Wise.
[Sent from a Win7 PC.]
--
/Daniel P. Brown
daniel.br...@parasane.net || danbr...@php.net
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Daniel Brown paras...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 13:20, Ashley Sheridan a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk
wrote:
I have heard good things about Windows 7, but I've not used it myself
yet (and don't really plan to)
Wise.
[Sent from a Win7
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Adam Richardson simples...@gmail.comwrote:
Contrary to my experiences a few years ago, there is no real loser
anymore,
they all are very nice and have their advantages.
Well, I still believe that Linux is the better suitor for a server, but some
companies
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 13:57 -0400, Dan Joseph wrote:
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Adam Richardson simples...@gmail.comwrote:
Contrary to my experiences a few years ago, there is no real loser
anymore,
they all are very nice and have their advantages.
Well, I still believe that
-Original Message-
From: Ashley Sheridan [mailto:a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 11:04 AM
To: Dan Joseph
Cc: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: replying to list (I give up)
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 13:57 -0400, Dan Joseph wrote:
On Fri, Apr
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Tommy Pham tommy...@gmail.com wrote:
As a desktop system, it's my personal choice. Both KDE 4 and Gnome 3
(released in Sept 2010) offer better flashiness than Windows 7 and
arguably better than the latest Mac OSX too, and the tools are as stable
as
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 11:12 -0700, Tommy Pham wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Ashley Sheridan [mailto:a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 11:04 AM
To: Dan Joseph
Cc: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: replying to list (I give up)
On Fri
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 6:17 PM, Ashley Sheridan
a...@ashleysheridan.co.ukwrote:
I run it under Wine. Wine has come a long way since my first encounters
with it a few years back and run a surprising amount of Windows-based
software. I don't know how far its support for Flash has come, but I do
...@cbord.com
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:01:55
To: Michelle Konzacklinux4miche...@tamay-dogan.net;
php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: RE: [PHP] Re: replying to list (I give up)
From: Michelle Konzack
Hello Peter Lind,
Am 2010-04-21 15:47:54, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
And waste time
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 15:55 -0500, Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
On Apr 21, 2010, at 1:51 PM, Jay Blanchard wrote:
Then write an interface (using PHP of course) that
only responds to the list when you generate a reply.
LOL
WT??
WHY would we want to do that? Much unnecessary work when an
On Wednesday 21 April 2010 12:16:28 O. Lavell wrote:
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Hello David McGlone,
Am 2010-04-21 08:27:18, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
I give up. trying to reply to messages on this list is tedious. I can't
pinpoint whether it's because the list is set up to make
Hi,
I am planning to install on embedded device. Please help me to reduce the
binary footprint.
thanks,
Mitul modi
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 08:52, Mitul Modi mituld.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am planning to install on embedded device. Please help me to reduce the
binary footprint.
You sent two messages to the Install list and then hijacked this
thread. Send a new message to php-general@lists.php.net
On 22 April 2010 12:14, Ashley Sheridan a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk wrote:
I believe Dan Brown mentioned a very good reason why this is not as
simple an issue as just changing the reply-to. Not everyone who posts to
the list subscribes to the list, so being copied into the emails is good
for
On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 17:06 +0200, Peter Lind wrote:
On 22 April 2010 12:14, Ashley Sheridan a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk wrote:
I believe Dan Brown mentioned a very good reason why this is not as
simple an issue as just changing the reply-to. Not everyone who posts to
the list subscribes to
On 22 April 2010 17:05, Ashley Sheridan a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 17:06 +0200, Peter Lind wrote:
On 22 April 2010 12:14, Ashley Sheridan a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk wrote:
I believe Dan Brown mentioned a very good reason why this is not as
simple an issue as just
On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 17:35 +0200, Peter Lind wrote:
Which is worse, one person having to
check the answer by looking at the mailing list archive or the rest of
the list not benefiting at all from the answer?
Well, as that one person was the one who needed the help enough to ask
the question
On 21 April 2010 20:09, Michelle Konzack linux4miche...@tamay-dogan.net wrote:
Hello Peter Lind,
Hi Michelle
Am 2010-04-21 15:47:54, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
And waste time every single time you post to the list ... why do
people become programmers/developers again? To end creating
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 20:38 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Hello David McGlone,
Am 2010-04-21 09:37:48, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
Yes. but if it was so harmful, why does the 40, 50 or so lists that I've
been on, simply let you hit the reply and it goes back to the list?
Can you
On Apr 21, 2010, at 1:51 PM, Jay Blanchard wrote:
Then write an interface (using PHP of course) that
only responds to the list when you generate a reply.
LOL
WT??
WHY would we want to do that? Much unnecessary work when an admin
could set a reply-to and all would be solved.
With all due
31 matches
Mail list logo
