At 1:47 PM -0400 5/21/11, Adam Richardson wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 10:11 AM, tedd
mailto:t...@sperling.comt...@sperling.com wrote:
Hi gang:
Okay, so,what's the best (i.e., most secure) way for your script
to identify itself *IF* you plan on using that information later,
such as the
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 3:11 PM, tedd t...@sperling.com wrote:
Hi gang:
Okay, so,what's the best (i.e., most secure) way for your script to
identify itself *IF* you plan on using that information later, such as the
value in an action attribute in a form?
For example, I was using:
$self =
I use
define('page1, 1);
Richard L. Buskirk
-Original Message-
From: tedd [mailto:t...@sperling.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2011 10:11 AM
To: PHP General
Subject: [PHP] Script ID?
Hi gang:
Okay, so,what's the best (i.e., most secure) way for your script to
identify itself *IF*
On Sat, 2011-05-21 at 10:11 -0400, tedd wrote:
Hi gang:
Okay, so,what's the best (i.e., most secure) way for your script to
identify itself *IF* you plan on using that information later, such
as the value in an action attribute in a form?
For example, I was using:
$self =
So sorry Tedd,
I was typing away with the rest of that and after hitting send I
notice all I sent was the define.
define('PAGE_1', 1);
I use define because sometimes I want o know what script included another
and if that script does not have a defined value I do not allow it to run.
Just
On 21 May 2011 16:18, Stuart Dallas stu...@3ft9.com wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 3:11 PM, tedd t...@sperling.com wrote:
Hi gang:
Okay, so,what's the best (i.e., most secure) way for your script to
identify itself *IF* you plan on using that information later, such as the
value in an
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Peter Lind peter.e.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 May 2011 16:18, Stuart Dallas stu...@3ft9.com wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 3:11 PM, tedd t...@sperling.com wrote:
Hi gang:
Okay, so,what's the best (i.e., most secure) way for your script to
identify
On 21 May 2011 17:01, Stuart Dallas stu...@3ft9.com wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Peter Lind peter.e.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 May 2011 16:18, Stuart Dallas stu...@3ft9.com wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 3:11 PM, tedd t...@sperling.com wrote:
Hi gang:
Okay, so,what's the
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Peter Lind peter.e.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 May 2011 17:01, Stuart Dallas stu...@3ft9.com wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Peter Lind peter.e.l...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 21 May 2011 16:18, Stuart Dallas stu...@3ft9.com wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2011
On 21 May 2011 17:18, Stuart Dallas stu...@3ft9.com wrote:
*snip*
Again, this depends upon what your url scheme looks like - and without
knowing that, there's simple no clue as to whether or not this is a
good solution to the problem (though it might be a good solution to A
problem).
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Peter Lind peter.e.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 May 2011 17:18, Stuart Dallas stu...@3ft9.com wrote:
*snip*
Again, this depends upon what your url scheme looks like - and without
knowing that, there's simple no clue as to whether or not this is a
good
On Sat, 2011-05-21 at 16:34 +0100, Stuart Dallas wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Peter Lind peter.e.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 May 2011 17:18, Stuart Dallas stu...@3ft9.com wrote:
*snip*
Again, this depends upon what your url scheme looks like - and without
knowing that,
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Ashley Sheridan
a...@ashleysheridan.co.ukwrote:
On Sat, 2011-05-21 at 16:47 +0100, Stuart Dallas wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Ashley Sheridan
a...@ashleysheridan.co.ukwrote:
On Sat, 2011-05-21 at 16:34 +0100, Stuart Dallas wrote:
On Sat,
On Sat, 2011-05-21 at 16:53 +0100, Stuart Dallas wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Ashley Sheridan
a...@ashleysheridan.co.ukwrote:
On Sat, 2011-05-21 at 16:47 +0100, Stuart Dallas wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Ashley Sheridan
a...@ashleysheridan.co.ukwrote:
On
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Peter Lind peter.e.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 May 2011 17:34, Stuart Dallas stu...@3ft9.com wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Peter Lind peter.e.l...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 21 May 2011 17:18, Stuart Dallas stu...@3ft9.com wrote:
*snip*
Again,
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Ashley Sheridan
a...@ashleysheridan.co.ukwrote:
On Sat, 2011-05-21 at 16:53 +0100, Stuart Dallas wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Ashley Sheridan
a...@ashleysheridan.co.ukwrote:
On Sat, 2011-05-21 at 16:47 +0100, Stuart Dallas wrote:
On Sat,
On 21 May 2011 18:05, Stuart Dallas stu...@3ft9.com wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Peter Lind peter.e.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 May 2011 17:34, Stuart Dallas stu...@3ft9.com wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Peter Lind peter.e.l...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 21 May 2011 17:18,
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Peter Lind peter.e.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 May 2011 18:05, Stuart Dallas stu...@3ft9.com wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Peter Lind peter.e.l...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 21 May 2011 17:34, Stuart Dallas stu...@3ft9.com wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2011
On 21 May 2011 18:26, Stuart Dallas stu...@3ft9.com wrote:
*snip*
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defensive_programming
You do things your way and I'll do things my way. Best of luck to you.
Thank you for your condescending tone. Best of luck to you too.
Regards
Peter
--
hype
WWW: plphp.dk /
On 21 May 2011 18:42, Stuart Dallas stu...@3ft9.com wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Peter Lind peter.e.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 May 2011 18:26, Stuart Dallas stu...@3ft9.com wrote:
*snip*
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defensive_programming
You do things your way and I'll do
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Peter Lind peter.e.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 May 2011 18:26, Stuart Dallas stu...@3ft9.com wrote:
*snip*
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defensive_programming
You do things your way and I'll do things my way. Best of luck to you.
Thank you for your
On May 21, 2011, at 9:11 AM, tedd wrote:
Hi gang:
Okay, so,what's the best (i.e., most secure) way for your script
to identify itself *IF* you plan on using that information later,
such as the value in an action attribute in a form?
For example, I was using:
$self =
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Peter Lind peter.e.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 May 2011 18:42, Stuart Dallas stu...@3ft9.com wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Peter Lind peter.e.l...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 21 May 2011 18:26, Stuart Dallas stu...@3ft9.com wrote:
*snip*
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 10:11 AM, tedd t...@sperling.com wrote:
Hi gang:
Okay, so,what's the best (i.e., most secure) way for your script to
identify itself *IF* you plan on using that information later, such as the
value in an action attribute in a form?
For example, I was using:
$self
At 6:29 PM +0100 5/21/11, Stuart Dallas wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Peter Lind
mailto:peter.e.l...@gmail.competer.e.l...@gmail.com wrote:
-snip-
This was fun... we should do it again sometime! ;)
No, this wasn't fun.
As I said before, is email is a bad way to communicate. But
25 matches
Mail list logo
