On Dec 6, 2007 9:14 PM, tedd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 6:07 PM -0500 12/6/07, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
On Dec 6, 2007 4:59 PM, tedd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is, could you guarantee to a preferred service
provider
that they would receive top-listing 25 percent of the time? Keep
On 07 December 2007 02:14, tedd wrote:
Now, what I need is a way to analyze the distribution of the current
service providers to see if a given location is open to being sold as
a preferred position -- do you see what I mean?
Another example, let's say we have four preferred service
On Dec 7, 2007 10:12 AM, Ford, Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 07 December 2007 02:14, tedd wrote:
Now, what I need is a way to analyze the distribution of the current
service providers to see if a given location is open to being sold as
a preferred position -- do you see what I mean?
On Dec 6, 2007 4:59 PM, tedd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi gang:
This post is related to the zip lat/long request I recently made and
received such an overwhelming response -- many thanks to all.
In any event, let's say we have a end-user who is looking for
services within his zip-code AND
At 6:07 PM -0500 12/6/07, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
On Dec 6, 2007 4:59 PM, tedd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is, could you guarantee to a preferred service provider
that they would receive top-listing 25 percent of the time? Keep in
mind that preferred service providers will overlap.
5 matches
Mail list logo
