ECTED]]
> Sent: 13 June 2002 2:44 PM
> To: Niklas Lampén
> Cc: Php-General
> Subject: Re: [PHP] php-speed
>
>
> Thursday, June 13, 2002, 2:09:23 PM, you wrote:
> > I don't think so. The difference is (IMHO + the article
> linked below) if
> > you use
>
Thursday, June 13, 2002, 2:09:23 PM, you wrote:
> I don't think so. The difference is (IMHO + the article linked below) if
> you use
> ...Foo... (faster)
> or
> Foo..."; ?> (slower)
Actually, Brian is right. PHP parses text contained within "s whereas it
doesn't do so with text contained within
-
> From: Niklas Lampén [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 13 June 2002 1:25 PM
> To: Php-General
> Subject: RE: [PHP] php-speed
>
>
> On which part was I wrong?
>
> Printing HTML via PHP is slower than inserting PHP into HTML. Maybe
> we're just having communicatio
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 13 June 2002 1:25 PM
> To: Php-General
> Subject: RE: [PHP] php-speed
>
>
> On which part was I wrong?
>
> Printing HTML via PHP is slower than inserting PHP into HTML. Maybe
> we're just having communicational problems. :)
>
&g
d
now? ;)
Btw. everyone else, check that link below too, if this issue is in your
interest.
Niklas
-Original Message-
From: Pradeep Dsouza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13. kesäkuuta 2002 15:21
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PHP] php-speed
See this
And maybe you might change
Embedding PHP in HTML, since I think HTML is ignored by php, just passed
thru.
Niklas
-Original Message-
From: Philipp Melab [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13. kesäkuuta 2002 14:55
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PHP] php-speed
I have a simple newbie question...
Whats better (fast
6 matches
Mail list logo