Re[2]: [PHP] Re: php security books

2007-07-04 Thread Richard Davey
Hi Andrew, Wednesday, July 4, 2007, 4:23:38 PM, you wrote: Avoid the O'Reilly one as it is flawed. In what way? Its written by Chris Shiflett, isn't that enough reason? No, not really. The errata are clearly published online, and while you could argue that some of them shouldn't have

Re: Re[2]: [PHP] Re: php security books

2007-07-04 Thread Andrew Hutchings
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED](Richard Davey) wrote: Hi Andrew, Wednesday, July 4, 2007, 4:23:38 PM, you wrote: Avoid the O'Reilly one as it is flawed. In what way? Its written by Chris Shiflett, isn't that enough reason? No, not really. The errata are