php-general Digest 2 Oct 2010 21:51:07 -0000 Issue 6970
Topics (messages 308397 through 308404):
PHP and SpatiaLite
308397 by: TR Shaw
Since it is friday.... :)
308398 by: Jason Pruim
Hi.
308399 by: Davi Ramos
Re: Friday's Post
308400 by: Peter Lind
308401 by: Per Jessen
308402 by: Peter Lind
308403 by: Ashley Sheridan
Re: Little Parsing help...
308404 by: chris h
Administrivia:
To subscribe to the digest, e-mail:
php-general-digest-subscr...@lists.php.net
To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail:
php-general-digest-unsubscr...@lists.php.net
To post to the list, e-mail:
php-gene...@lists.php.net
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--- Begin Message ---
Anyone succeeded in geting php and SpatiaLite to work together?
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Anyone know of a good and active general web design list? Looking for
somewhere that I can post about javascript specifically :)
And happy friday to you all! :)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Dear friend
i am glad to tell you a good news ,and i find a good website ： www.ebisrr.com
On this website ,you can find many new and original electronic
products .Now they are holding sales promotion activity, all the
product are sold at a discount.
And i have bought some products from this web, the quality is very
good , the price is very cheap and competitive,the delivery is on time
.
Hope everything goes well.
Greetings!
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 1 October 2010 20:21, Per Jessen <p...@computer.org> wrote:
> Peter Lind wrote:
>
>> C# has by now exceeded Java by quite a bit -
>
> I've been away from the Java "scene" since 2002 (when I worked for BEA
> deploying J2EE on Linux/390), but assuming you're talking
> about "deployed lines of code" or some other real-life measurement, I
> find it hard to believe that C# should have exceeded Java.
Language functionality. I'd much rather use C# than Java as I can do
more in C# and easier than with Java. For instance, C# 4 has " support
for late binding to dynamic types". Does Java have an equivalent? Is
it planned?
Regards
Peter
--
<hype>
WWW: http://plphp.dk / http://plind.dk
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/plind
BeWelcome/Couchsurfing: Fake51
Twitter: http://twitter.com/kafe15
</hype>
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Peter Lind wrote:
> On 1 October 2010 20:21, Per Jessen <p...@computer.org> wrote:
>> Peter Lind wrote:
>>
>>> C# has by now exceeded Java by quite a bit -
>>
>> I've been away from the Java "scene" since 2002 (when I worked for
>> BEA deploying J2EE on Linux/390), but assuming you're talking
>> about "deployed lines of code" or some other real-life measurement, I
>> find it hard to believe that C# should have exceeded Java.
>
> Language functionality. I'd much rather use C# than Java as I can do
> more in C# and easier than with Java. For instance, C# 4 has " support
> for late binding to dynamic types". Does Java have an equivalent? Is
> it planned?
I don't know, but Java obviously supports late binding.
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (14.1°C)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2 October 2010 11:05, Per Jessen <p...@computer.org> wrote:
> Peter Lind wrote:
>
>> On 1 October 2010 20:21, Per Jessen <p...@computer.org> wrote:
>>> Peter Lind wrote:
>>>
>>>> C# has by now exceeded Java by quite a bit -
>>>
>>> I've been away from the Java "scene" since 2002 (when I worked for
>>> BEA deploying J2EE on Linux/390), but assuming you're talking
>>> about "deployed lines of code" or some other real-life measurement, I
>>> find it hard to believe that C# should have exceeded Java.
>>
>> Language functionality. I'd much rather use C# than Java as I can do
>> more in C# and easier than with Java. For instance, C# 4 has " support
>> for late binding to dynamic types". Does Java have an equivalent? Is
>> it planned?
>
> I don't know, but Java obviously supports late binding.
>
I was looking more for dynamic types, much more of interest to the
average PHP dev as that's one of the typical stumbling blocks when
switching languages. And no, far as I can tell Java doesn't offer
that.
Regards
Peter
--
<hype>
WWW: http://plphp.dk / http://plind.dk
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/plind
BeWelcome/Couchsurfing: Fake51
Twitter: http://twitter.com/kafe15
</hype>
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 23:42 +0100, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> tedd wrote:
> > Hi gang:
> >
> > What do you people think of the .NET framework?
> >
> > Please provide your thoughts as to cost, maintenance, benefit, and
> > whatever else you think important.
>
> .NET is loaded up with patents and pretty much Microsoft only, however
> that said it is rather good. Previous versions of C# (1/2) are
> standardized under ECMA-Script 334 and 335 which covers a lot of .NET
> however doesn't include asp.net, ado.net and windows forms - thus a nice
> open source implementation and platform is quite common now, namely
> Mono, this is .net compatible and has good support/development and has
> been used for everything from the unity game engine through to sims 3.
> Might be worth having a quick look at DotGNU and portable.net (as well
> as mod_mono for apache http - which supports as.net pages etc).
>
> Might be worth noting that Stallman (as in Richard Stallman from FSF)
> doesn't recommend using it because he's thinks MS will come with the
> patent trolls soon, however microsoft has effectively tied themselves in
> to a patent non assert ("community promise") which would prevent this.
>
> Also worth having a look at "M" for something different/interesting/from
> microsoft, and also OData which is a nice RESTful protocol.
>
> Best,
>
> Nathan
>
>
I'd like to add a little there. Although the Mono project is great, it
is always left a step behind, because Microsoft has a tendency to
release newer features of .Net that the Mono developers have to play
catch-up with.
Like Paul mentioned, it's probably not safe to let yourself be tied in
to a closed format, even if it has open parts. One only has to look back
a few years to find more examples of companies losing data because it
was locked into an old format, or being stuck with old and obsolete
versions of software because the company that makes it stopped writing
it, or went bust. This sort of thing doesn't really happen with OSS,
because there is always a community ready to take up the projects.
Thanks,
Ash
http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Don,
How far along are you? To get started something like this may work for
you...
preg_match_all('/[A-G]{1}#?/', $line, $matches);
That SHOULD return each note of the line (you can retrieve them via the
$matches array), given that there are no other upper-case characters that
are not notes. Also this assumes that $line has exactly one line in it. :)
If you get that working, perhaps you can setup something using the
preg_replace method?
http://php.net/manual/en/function.preg-replace.php
Another option is to use the str_replace function.
http://us3.php.net/manual/en/function.str-replace.php
I gotta run (else I would type some more) but let me know if you want any
advice on using those!
Chris.
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Don Wieland <d...@pointmade.net> wrote:
> The logic I need is pretty straight forward, but I am having a hard time
> replicating it using PHP functions. I will try to break it down to it's
> simplest form:
>
> I have a field that has several lines of text. Chords and Song Lyrics.
>
> The "Chord" lines begin with an asterisk "*" and end with the line break.
> This is the string I want to parse. Lines with no asterisk at the beginning
> are ignored.
>
> Based on 3 arrays of NOTES, I want SUBSTITUTE the text (based on exact text
> character patterns - just NOTES not the chord type) of the lines in my field
> that start with an asterisk "*".
>
> original_chord_array = A, A#, B, C, C#, D, D#, E, F, F#, G, G#
> transpose_up_array = A#, B, C, C#, D, D#, E, F, F#, G, G#, A
> transpose_down_array = G#, A, A#, B, C, C#, D, D#, E, F, F#, G
>
> It is important that it only effects EXACT strings. Notes will always be
> capitalized and chord types will be lower case. Maybe we can use that
> characteristic to better identify what to change. Here are some examples of
> chords:
>
> A
> Asus7
> Csus add9
> Dmaj7
> F#m7
> G#
> C#dim no3
>
> When I transpose UP these chords, just the NOTE should change:
>
> A#
> A#sus7
> C#sus add9
> D#maj7
> Gm7
> A
> Ddim no3
>
> When I transpose DOWN these chords, just the NOTE should change:
>
> G#
> G#sus7
> Bsus add9
> C#maj7
> Fm7
> G
> Cdim no3
>
> I am working on a function, but still not producing the proper results.
> Hopefully this break down is more clear and someone will bail me out ;-)
>
> Thanks again for the feedback.
>
> Don
>
>
> On Oct 1, 2010, at 7:02 AM, Richard Quadling wrote:
>
> Changing the NormalKeyID and using that ID with NoteSequenceNumber
>> should give you the new note to play.
>>
>> I think.
>>
>
>
> --
> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
--- End Message ---
