[PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Richard Davey
Hi all, I'm very happy to announce that I've just released my comprehensive guide to installing, configuring and running Apache 2, PHP 4.4.7 and PHP 5.2.2 on Windows XP. The guide is broken down into small manageable sections and contains over 50 screen shots of the entire process, so you won't

Re: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Daniel Brown
On 5/17/07, Richard Davey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I'm very happy to announce that I've just released my comprehensive guide to installing, configuring and running Apache 2, PHP 4.4.7 and PHP 5.2.2 on Windows XP. The guide is broken down into small manageable sections and contains over

Re: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Robert Cummings
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 16:26 +0100, Richard Davey wrote: Hi all, I'm very happy to announce that I've just released my comprehensive guide to installing, configuring and running Apache 2, PHP 4.4.7 and PHP 5.2.2 on Windows XP. The guide is broken down into small manageable sections and

Re[2]: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Richard Davey
Hi Robert, Thursday, May 17, 2007, 4:43:14 PM, you wrote: Suggestion: get rid of Windows XP and use a real OS There's always one ;) You have previously and the past redundancy since previous implies the past and past implies previous. Fixed :) Cheers, Rich -- Zend Certified

Re: Re[2]: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Greg Donald
On 5/17/07, Richard Davey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Suggestion: get rid of Windows XP and use a real OS There's always one ;) No, there's more than one. -- Greg Donald http://destiney.com/ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit:

Re[4]: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Richard Davey
Hi Greg, Thursday, May 17, 2007, 5:01:18 PM, you wrote: There's always one ;) No, there's more than one. Sure, but you're in the minority*, so what do I care? :) * I just took the Zend PHP IDE research poll, and at the end it gives you the chance to view the stats of everyone else who took

Re: Re[4]: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Robert Cummings
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 17:19 +0100, Richard Davey wrote: Hi Greg, Thursday, May 17, 2007, 5:01:18 PM, you wrote: There's always one ;) No, there's more than one. Sure, but you're in the minority*, so what do I care? :) * I just took the Zend PHP IDE research poll, and at the end

Re: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Jon Anderson
Richard Davey wrote: Sure, but you're in the minority*, so what do I care? :) * I just took the Zend PHP IDE research poll, and at the end it gives you the chance to view the stats of everyone else who took the poll. Interestingly, 70% of them use Windows XP for development. I actually use a

Re: Re[4]: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Greg Donald
On 5/17/07, Richard Davey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sure, but you're in the minority*, so what do I care? :) I'm not asking you to care. Windoze still sucks, no matter how many idiots use it. The virus protection racket alone is enough to make me throw up. -- Greg Donald

Re[2]: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Richard Davey
Hi Jon, Thursday, May 17, 2007, 5:46:12 PM, you wrote: I find it funny that the addition of the numbers above would logically put me in the 0% category. You could select multiple operating systems from the list. 50% of them used Linux too. It didn't show how the results were mixed though,

Re[6]: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Richard Davey
Hi Greg, Thursday, May 17, 2007, 5:49:45 PM, you wrote: Sure, but you're in the minority*, so what do I care? :) I'm not asking you to care. Windoze still sucks, no matter how many idiots use it. The virus protection racket alone is enough to make me throw up. Viruses? God, that old

Re: Re[6]: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Jason Pruim
On May 17, 2007, at 1:00 PM, Richard Davey wrote: Hi Greg, Thursday, May 17, 2007, 5:49:45 PM, you wrote: Sure, but you're in the minority*, so what do I care? :) I'm not asking you to care. Windoze still sucks, no matter how many idiots use it. The virus protection racket alone is

Re: Re[6]: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Daniel Brown
On 5/17/07, Richard Davey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Greg, Thursday, May 17, 2007, 5:49:45 PM, you wrote: Sure, but you're in the minority*, so what do I care? :) I'm not asking you to care. Windoze still sucks, no matter how many idiots use it. The virus protection racket alone is

Re: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Lester Caine
Richard Davey wrote: Viruses? God, that old bullshit ladened chestnut*. At least come up with some kind of valid OS argument, please. If you'd gone for 'competent use of the CPU', or 'effective memory management', you'd be worth taking seriously. How about installation time. Just clocked up

Re: Re[6]: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Crayon Shin Chan
On Friday 18 May 2007 01:00, Richard Davey wrote: Viruses? God, that old bullshit ladened chestnut*. At least come up with some kind of valid OS argument, please. If you'd gone for 'competent use of the CPU', or 'effective memory management', you'd be worth taking seriously. In a roundabout

Re: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Robert Cummings
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 12:46 -0400, Jon Anderson wrote: Richard Davey wrote: Sure, but you're in the minority*, so what do I care? :) * I just took the Zend PHP IDE research poll, and at the end it gives you the chance to view the stats of everyone else who took the poll. Interestingly,

Re: Re[6]: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Robert Cummings
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 13:13 -0400, Jason Pruim wrote: On May 17, 2007, at 1:00 PM, Richard Davey wrote: Hi Greg, Thursday, May 17, 2007, 5:49:45 PM, you wrote: Sure, but you're in the minority*, so what do I care? :) I'm not asking you to care. Windoze still sucks, no matter how

Re: Re[6]: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Robert Cummings
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 01:44 +0800, Crayon Shin Chan wrote: On Friday 18 May 2007 01:00, Richard Davey wrote: Viruses? God, that old bullshit ladened chestnut*. At least come up with some kind of valid OS argument, please. If you'd gone for 'competent use of the CPU', or 'effective memory

Re: Re[6]: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Greg Donald
On 5/17/07, Richard Davey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Viruses? God, that old bullshit ladened chestnut*. At least come up with some kind of valid OS argument, please. 1. The virus and malware protection racket - M$ spent billions of dollars and several years making Vista and just like normal it's

Re[2]: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Richard Davey
Hi Lester, Thursday, May 17, 2007, 6:24:44 PM, you wrote: How about installation time. Just clocked up 6.5 Hours re-installing XP on a machine. To get the last linux machine to the same level - 20 mins. Of cause running Eclipse - it does not matter what the OS is :( Yeah I'd take

Re[8]: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Richard Davey
Hi Robert, Thursday, May 17, 2007, 7:01:00 PM, you wrote: I had 500 things I wanted to change, then I switched from Windows to Linux in 2000 and found that they had been addressed. Sure enough though, I'm working on a new list. There's only a few things on it though ;) I envy those who's

Re: Re[8]: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Greg Donald
On 5/17/07, Richard Davey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I envy those who's work is specific / targeted enough for them to be able to only use Linux on their desktop, I really do (and I say that without a hint of sarcasm, I promise). For the rest of us, the choice sadly isn't as black and white.

Re[8]: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Richard Davey
Hi Greg, Thursday, May 17, 2007, 7:23:47 PM, you wrote: Viruses? God, that old bullshit ladened chestnut*. At least come up with some kind of valid OS argument, please. 1. The virus and malware protection racket - M$ spent billions of 2. Perpetual Upgrading - you can use Ubuntu Linux 6.06

Re: Re[8]: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Greg Donald
On 5/17/07, Richard Davey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yay, some decent arguments! I don't deny any of them, I only take exception to being called an 'idiot' by yourself for the OS I have to use. I apologize. I meant it in a stereotypical, M$-hating, sort of way.. nothing towards you personally.

Re: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Stut
Richard Davey wrote: I'm very happy to announce that I've just released my comprehensive guide to installing, configuring and running Apache 2, PHP 4.4.7 and PHP 5.2.2 on Windows XP. The guide is broken down into small manageable sections and contains over 50 screen shots of the entire process,

Re: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Robert Cummings
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 20:18 +0100, Stut wrote: Richard Davey wrote: I'm very happy to announce that I've just released my comprehensive guide to installing, configuring and running Apache 2, PHP 4.4.7 and PHP 5.2.2 on Windows XP. The guide is broken down into small manageable sections and

Re: [PHP] A Guide to running Apache 2, PHP 4 PHP 5 on Windows XP

2007-05-17 Thread Stut
Robert Cummings wrote: BTW, could someone get behind me and give that stick thing that's poking out a pull. I've been having trouble walking lately ;) Not a chance in hell I'm going near that!! Ps. I apologize in advance to anyone who accidentally got caught up in some errant mental