Nick,
3 Things:
1) For a simple for loop, PHP, ASP, JSP, etc will all be
able to execute 20000 (2000 x 10) iterations of a loop in less
then 1 on decent hardware (my home PC does locally)...
<?php
for ($i=0; $i < 20000; $i++)
{
echo "$i <br>\n";
}
?>
The numbers you quote are absurd, it entirely depends
on WHAT IS INSIDE YOUR LOOP however.
2) I read a report to the effect that:
PHP > ASP > Cold Fusion > JSP-tomcat (w/ no mention of .NET)
number pages able to be rendered a second on the same Hardware
it was some think like 70 to 60 to 30 to 20. Your results will depends
who feeds you your propaganda, unless you test it
yourself.
3) What does this have to do with the future of anything? Cold
Fusion and Perl are not even mentioned here, but do you think
they are going away anytime soon?
Cheers,
-Ironstorm
Northern.CA ===--
http://www.northern.ca
Canada's Search Engine
On 2 Sep 2001 14:00:00 -0000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#################### (Attached Message) ####################----- "nick"
----- php's future
----- Sun, 2 Sep 2001 19:28:27 +0800
Hi all in the list :
I read an news that said jsp/asp.net is better than php..
They made a test that asp/php/jsp/asp.net using "for loops",
Jsp from 1 to 20000 takes only 4 secs
Asp from 1 to 2000 (not 20000) takes 72 secs
Php from 1 to 2000 (not 20000) takes 68 secs
Asp.Net from 1 to 20000 takes only 3.5~3.8 secs...
So is it time to learn jsp/asp+ instead of learning php ..???
I am so confused ~
I have been learning php for a while and now it said jsp/asp+ is better
than it.@@
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
