I just started using PHP and got to think...
Without getting into the discussion of best practices, strictly from a
performance perspective,
what is faster: a function or an include?
For example I have a block of text that needs to appear mutliple times
throughout the site.
Will I be
Frank Lopes wrote:
I just started using PHP and got to think...
Without getting into the discussion of best practices, strictly from
a performance perspective,
what is faster: a function or an include?
For example I have a block of text that needs to appear mutliple times
throughout the
On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 11:27 +1100, Chris wrote:
Frank Lopes wrote:
I just started using PHP and got to think...
Without getting into the discussion of best practices, strictly from
a performance perspective,
what is faster: a function or an include?
For example I have a block of
On Nov 11, 2007 9:32 PM, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 11:27 +1100, Chris wrote:
Frank Lopes wrote:
I just started using PHP and got to think...
Without getting into the discussion of best practices, strictly from
a performance perspective,
what
Nathan Nobbe wrote:
On Nov 11, 2007 9:32 PM, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 11:27 +1100, Chris wrote:
Frank Lopes wrote:
I just started using PHP and got to think...
Without getting into the discussion
On Nov 11, 2007 11:52 PM, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I said, it's a micro-optimization *shrug*. 0.0004 seconds difference
over 10 iterations - wow ;)
actually it was just one iteration; the output isnt very clear, but thats
the
value of a variable.
anyway, i was surprised to see the
Nathan Nobbe wrote:
On Nov 11, 2007 11:52 PM, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I said, it's a micro-optimization *shrug*. 0.0004 seconds difference
over 10 iterations - wow ;)
actually it was just one iteration; the output isnt very clear, but
thats the
7 matches
Mail list logo