Zeev,
If you find that GUI tools are not overwhelmingly better for C++, Java product
development, that does weaken the case for php studios even more. Why so?
1. Conciseness of php
php is a high level application development tool so the code is, or at least,
should mostly consist of highly
At 05:02 18/02/2002, Peter J. Schoenster wrote:
Well, as you said, no point in arguing. Just that I think if someone
really wants to develop they should learn some better tools than a
GUI but it's a question of balance.
That's quite an arguable point. I don't code PHP but C++ and Java, and I
Chris,
Stability improved *a lot* since the beta in December. Remember, it *was*
a beta release, and like most betas, stability was not perfect. It's quite
good now, and it also got a whole new (well, mostly new) code completion
engine which is really revolutionary for PHP.
I'm not
At 00:27 18/02/2002, robert janeczek wrote:
hi
i write in php about 1.5 years. from the beginning i use macromedia homesite
and i`m quite content of it. but...debugger, environment not optimized for
php developers etc. so i wanted to try zend studio, i downloaded it,
installed (w2k, i already had
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 February 2002 15:57
Subject: Re: [PHP] zend studio 2.0
Chris,
Stability improved *a lot* since the beta in December. Remember, it *was*
a beta release, and like most betas, stability was not perfect. It's quite
good now, and it also got a whole
At 19:53 18/02/2002, DL Neil wrote:
Zeev,
Didn't experience any stability problems with the beta per-se, but using a
Windows box was an exercise in
Unix-ification. Has the released version for Win32 seen significant
alterations to the GUI?
I'm not sure which beta you've seen, but the GUI is
The problems you were having with the server components of the studio
sound
quite odd - can you elaborate on them? (probably off-list, it's best if
you could submit a bug report about it through zend.com/store/pickup.php,
evaluation support).
This is water under the bridge now, but you
FYI-
My two cents. I have been running the demo version since a day or two
after it was released. On Windows 2000 it has been solid as a rock. I
have not tried it on my XP laptop yet, but will soon.
Zend Studio is really helping to make PHP 'legitimate' in the
corporate world since it
hi
i write in php about 1.5 years. from the beginning i use macromedia homesite
and i`m quite content of it. but...debugger, environment not optimized for
php developers etc. so i wanted to try zend studio, i downloaded it,
installed (w2k, i already had an apache, so i deleted what came with
On at , Unknown wrote:
i write in php about 1.5 years. from the beginning i use macromedia
homesite and i`m quite content of it. but...debugger, environment not
optimized for php developers etc. so i wanted to try zend studio, i
i`ve read this
Well I was hoping that article was interesting. It wasn't. I should
have known when I saw the use of homesite as an alternative.
sure, it was just simple look at zend studio, but it made me wonder why the
tool didn`t work on my system :) [yes - i think i know what was wrong, no
need to look
I hope we aren't going to get another chest-pounding real coders type of
argument going here. Homesite *IS* a text editor. It provides an amazing
number of shortcuts to tasks, including mouse-based tasks, many of which I
guarantee you I can get done faster with a mouse than anyone can typing. It
On 17 Feb 2002, at 16:12, Chris Lott wrote:
I hope we aren't going to get another chest-pounding real coders
type of argument going here. Homesite *IS* a text editor. It provides
Yeah, my bad.
an amazing number of shortcuts to tasks, including mouse-based tasks,
many of which I guarantee
Well, as you said, no point in arguing. Just that I think if someone
really wants to develop they should learn some better tools than a
GUI but it's a question of balance.
I think a definition of GUI might be in order. Homesite, for instance, is
just a big text editor. It has almost no GUI
14 matches
Mail list logo
