On Thursday 16 August 2001 7:35 pm, Elias Santiago wrote:
I believe that IIS passes the script name to php.exe with the first %s. I
think IIS replaces the first %s with the script name. From the second
article, I suppose that if the %s is changed to %S, the name passed to
php.exe would be
Me too, I've never had any problems with PHP running it with or without the
%s %s. I guess that IIS 3 required that, but IIS 4./5 not necessarily
require it (a useful bug??). Nevertheless, it work without them anyways.
I only wish that the PHP ISAPI module is FINALLY made stable (production
To: 'Angie Tollerson'
Subject: RE: [PHP-WIN] Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-WIN] Installation failed !
Please Help!
OK, pretty straight forward, I went through my list of
failures, and Almost all of them (the ones that failed
without the %s %s) used extensions to PHP (ming, crypt, etc,
etc
I've had PHP 3 to 4.01 and now 4.06 running under NT4 SP6a and now with W2K
IIS 5. From my experience, the %s %s is a requirement of IIS (not PHP).
This according to Microsoft rules (apparently %s %s is CASE SENSITIVE):
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q245/2/25.ASP
The %s %s
Found MS explanation! (at least the only place I've found the reason WHY %s
%s must be used)
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q276/4/94.ASP
I know, this is a KB article for Python, but look closely at the line that
says:
(The two %s after the executable are required for
First of all, the ISAPI module is not stable. It will just
cause you grief so
remove it from your filters list.
Now this is a true statement, especially with IIS, it just don't work.
Second, make the application extensions point to php.exe (you
don't need the
%s %s stuff).
This I
On Thursday 16 August 2001 4:45 pm, Powell, Jim (EER) wrote:
Second, make the application extensions point to php.exe (you
don't need the
%s %s stuff).
This I have to disagree with. Without the %s %s, you are rolling dice as
to whether the page will work or not. I never had this
7 matches
Mail list logo
