MEM wrote:
>> By the way, there are many reasons for creating objects inside of other
>> objects. This should not be considered an exception. I don't know where
>> this code belongs to, so I can't clear out if it is good or bad OOP
>> style.
>
> I do not intend to public judge the author, but the
> By the way, there are many reasons for creating objects inside of other
> objects. This should not be considered an exception. I don't know where
> this code belongs to, so I can't clear out if it is good or bad OOP
> style.
I do not intend to public judge the author, but the original article is
2 matches
Mail list logo
