Philip Thompson schreef:
Hi all.
What are your thoughts? Does this seem like a reasonable implementation?
Useful? Pointless? Hit me up - I can handle *constructive* criticism.
But for now, it's late and past my bedtime.
how do you set a property to null?
Cheers,
~Philip
It's not a bad idea but usually having accessor and mutator methods are used
to validate the data first before writing it to the properties. If you don't
have validation, you might as well set them directly and make them public
and don't really need a generic setter/getter method.
Although, this
please keep replies on list.
Philip Thompson schreef:
On Feb 19, 2009, at 2:59 AM, Jochem Maas wrote:
Philip Thompson schreef:
Hi all.
What are your thoughts? Does this seem like a reasonable implementation?
Useful? Pointless? Hit me up - I can handle *constructive* criticism.
On Feb 19, 2009, at 10:55 AM, Jochem Maas wrote:
please keep replies on list.
Sorry!
Philip Thompson schreef:
On Feb 19, 2009, at 2:59 AM, Jochem Maas wrote:
Philip Thompson schreef:
Hi all.
What are your thoughts? Does this seem like a reasonable
implementation?
Useful?
Also, i know php is an interpreted language. But wouldn't it be possible to
write a virtual machine for php and compile byte code... I know, php is not
Java or Actionscript :-P but it could be an add on feature. i guess the eval
wouldn't work then would it? Although eval could still be
Also, i know php is an interpreted language. But wouldn't it be possible to
write a virtual machine for php and compile byte code... I know, php is not
Java or Actionscript :-P but it could be an add on feature. i guess the eval
wouldn't work then would it? Although eval could still be
6 matches
Mail list logo
