Re: [PHP] Best practice question regarding set_include_path()

2012-05-10 Thread tamouse mailing lists
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 1:50 PM, admin wrote: > > > -Original Message- > From: Al [mailto:n...@ridersite.org] > Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 11:44 AM > To: php-general@lists.php.net > Subject: [PHP] Best practice question regarding set_include_path() > > For my applications, I've been usin

RE: [PHP] Best practice question regarding set_include_path()

2012-05-10 Thread admin
-Original Message- From: Al [mailto:n...@ridersite.org] Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 11:44 AM To: php-general@lists.php.net Subject: [PHP] Best practice question regarding set_include_path() For my applications, I've been using includes and other file addressing by using the doc root as

Re: [PHP] best practice question..

2004-12-09 Thread Richard Lynch
Guy Bowden wrote: > On this note - what is considered "best practice" in a - sent to friend > type thing. > > i.e. User inputs their name + message + email + friends email into a > html/flash form > > friend gets a link to read the message. > > currently I do this: > > 1 collect form input > 2 crea

Re: [PHP] best practice question..

2004-12-09 Thread Richard Davey
Hello Guy, Thursday, December 9, 2004, 12:34:03 PM, you wrote: GB> There's never a security issue here - i.e. i don't mind how many times / GB> who reads the message, but just want to make it hard to just guess keys GB> to read other messages (otherwise it would just be the db id) GB> This metho

RE: [PHP] Best practice question

2002-09-20 Thread Ford, Mike [LSS]
> -Original Message- > From: Jon Haworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 19 September 2002 18:18 > > What are peoples' thoughts on "one should always return a value from a > function, even if it's always going to be true"? Unprintable!! There's no point in returning a value if there'

RE: [PHP] Best practice question

2002-09-19 Thread Jon Haworth
Hi Adam, > > What are peoples' thoughts on "one should always return > > a value from a function, even if it's always going to be > > true"? > > > I'd say skip it if you know your never returning anything > different. Yeah, that's what I was leaning towards :-) What prompted the question wa

Re: [PHP] Best practice question

2002-09-19 Thread Adam Voigt
One extra variable to be declared to catch the true (if you do try and catch it) and one extra line (the return line in the function), I'd say skip it if you know your never returning anything different. Adam Voigt [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 13:17, Jon Haworth wrote: > Hi list, > >