( Sorry Eric - forgot to change the email address again :( )
Eric Butera wrote:
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Michael A. Peters wrote:
In some earlier thread (I really don't want to dig to find it) I argued for
running mysql_real_escape_string right on the _POST
I must concede I was definit
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 05:12:28PM -0500, Eric Butera wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Paul M Foster wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 12:34:40PM -0500, Eric Butera wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>
> >> PDO. :) Anything else is a waste of cpu cycles.
> >
> > I've looked into PDO, and I jus
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> Eric Butera wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Paul M Foster
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 12:34:40PM -0500, Eric Butera wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
PDO. :) Anything else is a waste of cpu cycles.
>>>
>>> I've looked
Eric Butera wrote:
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Paul M Foster wrote:
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 12:34:40PM -0500, Eric Butera wrote:
PDO. :) Anything else is a waste of cpu cycles.
I've looked into PDO, and I just didn't find it as feature-rich as the
"native" (non-OO) function assortme
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Paul M Foster wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 12:34:40PM -0500, Eric Butera wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>
>> PDO. :) Anything else is a waste of cpu cycles.
>
> I've looked into PDO, and I just didn't find it as feature-rich as the
> "native" (non-OO) function assortment fo
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 12:34:40PM -0500, Eric Butera wrote:
>
> PDO. :) Anything else is a waste of cpu cycles.
I've looked into PDO, and I just didn't find it as feature-rich as the
"native" (non-OO) function assortment for database types like MySQL and
PostgreSQL. Can PDO be extended?
I
I'm personally using CI DB abstraction layer, also used zend_db, they both
good but as Eric said, I think PDO is a better option.
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Eric Butera wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Michael A. Peters wrote:
> > In some earlier thread (I really don't want to dig
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Michael A. Peters wrote:
> In some earlier thread (I really don't want to dig to find it) I argued for
> running mysql_real_escape_string right on the _POST
>
> I must concede I was definitely wrong about that.
>
> The right place to do it is in a database abstracti
Hi,
> Never used pear before, but I seem to recall there being some issues where
> pear did not provide very good forward support when moving to new versions
> of php causing a need to recode. Is that still an issue?
Don't really know. I've not really had a problem with the stuff that
I've writte
Richard Heyes wrote:
Hi,
Anywhoo, that being said, does anyone have a suggestion for a good database
abstraction class?
Ooh, I think you'll get the odd one or two...
Preferably one that already has decent support for several open source
databases?
PEAR::DB was good, but IIRC it's now been
Hi,
> Anywhoo, that being said, does anyone have a suggestion for a good database
> abstraction class?
Ooh, I think you'll get the odd one or two...
> Preferably one that already has decent support for several open source
> databases?
PEAR::DB was good, but IIRC it's now been deprecated in favo
11 matches
Mail list logo