On 9/24/2010 9:49 AM, chris h wrote:
> "Gang of Four"
>
> http://www.amazon.com/Design-Patterns-Elements-Reusable-Object-Oriented/dp/0201633612
>
> An excellent book on OOP.
>
> Chris H.
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Bob McConnell wrote:
>
>> From: chris h
>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 24, 201
On 25 September 2010 00:11, Daniel Kolbo wrote:
> On 9/24/2010 8:35 AM, Peter Lind wrote:
>> On 24 September 2010 14:22, Bob McConnell wrote:
>>> From: David Hutto
>>>
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 4:09 AM, Gary wrote:
> Daniel Kolbo wrote:
>
>> Say you have two classes: human and mal
On 9/24/2010 6:11 PM, Daniel Kolbo wrote:
> On 9/24/2010 8:35 AM, Peter Lind wrote:
>> On 24 September 2010 14:22, Bob McConnell wrote:
>>> From: David Hutto
>>>
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 4:09 AM, Gary wrote:
> Daniel Kolbo wrote:
>
>> Say you have two classes: human and male. Fur
>
> On 9/24/2010 4:09 AM, Gary wrote:
>> Daniel Kolbo wrote:
>>
>>> Say you have two classes: human and male. Further, say male extends
>>> human. Let's say you have a human object. Then later you want to make
>>> that human object a male object. This seems to be a pretty reasonable
>>> thing
"Gang of Four"
http://www.amazon.com/Design-Patterns-Elements-Reusable-Object-Oriented/dp/0201633612
An excellent book on OOP.
Chris H.
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Bob McConnell wrote:
> From: chris h
>
> > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Peter Lind
> wrote:
> >
> > On 24 Septem
From: chris h
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Peter Lind
wrote:
>
> On 24 September 2010 14:22, Bob McConnell wrote:
> > From: David Hutto
> >
> >> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 4:09 AM, Gary
wrote:
> >>> Daniel Kolbo wrote:
> >>>
> Say you have two
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Peter Lind wrote:
> On 24 September 2010 14:22, Bob McConnell wrote:
> > From: David Hutto
> >
> >> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 4:09 AM, Gary
> wrote:
> >>> Daniel Kolbo wrote:
> >>>
> Say you have two classes: human and male. Further, say male extends
>
From: Peter Lind
> On 24 September 2010 14:22, Bob McConnell wrote:
>> From: David Hutto
>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 4:09 AM, Gary wrote:
Daniel Kolbo wrote:
> Say you have two classes: human and male. Further, say male extends
> human. Let's say you have a human object.
On 24 September 2010 14:22, Bob McConnell wrote:
> From: David Hutto
>
>> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 4:09 AM, Gary wrote:
>>> Daniel Kolbo wrote:
>>>
Say you have two classes: human and male. Further, say male extends
human. Let's say you have a human object. Then later you want to make
From: David Hutto
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 4:09 AM, Gary wrote:
>> Daniel Kolbo wrote:
>>
>>> Say you have two classes: human and male. Further, say male extends
>>> human. Let's say you have a human object. Then later you want to make
>>> that human object a male object. This seems to be a
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 4:09 AM, Gary wrote:
> Daniel Kolbo wrote:
>
>> Say you have two classes: human and male. Further, say male extends
>> human. Let's say you have a human object. Then later you want to make
>> that human object a male object. This seems to be a pretty reasonable
>> thing
11 matches
Mail list logo