On Wednesday 04 July 2001 16:58, Kurt Lieber wrote:
> That domain name doesn't appear to be valid. Perhaps you meant:
>
> http://validator.w3.org ?
Um, yes. Why can't the w3c simply have "w3c" as domain name? *sigh*
> http://validator.w3c.org/
--
Christian Reiniger
LGDC Webmaster (ht
t;
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2001 3:19 AM
Subject: Re: [PHP] Troubleshooting syntax ?
On Tuesday 03 July 2001 22:17, Jack Sasportas wrote:
> Can anyone suggest a tool / web site etc, that helps you check the html
> code for the missing / wrong syntax so that it is spotted quickly like
> m
On Tuesday 03 July 2001 22:17, Jack Sasportas wrote:
> Can anyone suggest a tool / web site etc, that helps you check the html
> code for the missing / wrong syntax so that it is spotted quickly like
> making it red or something, instead of reading through hundreds of
> lines of code, hopefully c
http://www.nestegg.net/validate.html
on 7/3/01 2:17 PM, Jack Sasportas at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Can anyone suggest a tool / web site etc, that helps you check the html
> code for the missing / wrong syntax so that it is spotted quickly like
> making it red or something, instead of reading t
I can't suggest any syntax checkers off-hand, but a suggestion for
future work...
I keep track of TABLE, TR, TD, etc. by indenting them like PHP/C code...
Perhaps that would alleviate this from happening again in the future for
you...
TABLE
TR
TD
/TD
I do a View Source on all my generated pages, save it as a file, then run
the file through Arachnophilia's tag checker. It reports missing tags and
line numbers where there are errors. Arachnophilia is "careware", I have
used it for a long time. There are doubtless other programs that will do
this
6 matches
Mail list logo
