On Tuesday, June 25, 2002, at 08:42 PM, Brian White wrote:
I was actually thinking about this the other
day - every now and again I find my self
yearning for SGML, where you could have
just declared the wrapping element end
tag omissable, and then you would never
have to worry about it -
rantmode
Hey - if you read my post a little more carefully
you would see that I was bemoaning the effective
passing of *SGML*. I was on a nostaligia trip.
I am well aware that SGML is a bit of a complicated
beheamoth, but it you have a decent SGML parser
( such as Omnimark or SP) you could do
On Tuesday, June 25, 2002, at 09:31 AM, William S. wrote:
I know I need to introduce: fread() and fseek().
but not sure how to put it all together.
If you know for a fact that the ending tag for each file is consistent
and always that same tag, here's an idea. Determine or specify the
Yes, that worked. Nice and effective solution.
Thank you.
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 09:51:21AM -0400, Erik Price wrote:
snip
If you know for a fact that the ending tag for each file is consistent
and always that same tag, here's an idea. Determine or specify the
length of the ending tag
4 matches
Mail list logo
