OK, i hear about this self signed certificate. Whenever i signed anything it
just came up with all these warnings in FF which confuses users and i think
is not good at all. Can someone paste a link in here to a website with a
self signed cert please? Would like to see if there are any warnings
German Geek wrote:
OK, i hear about this self signed certificate. Whenever i signed anything it
just came up with all these warnings in FF which confuses users and i think
is not good at all. Can someone paste a link in here to a website with a
self signed cert please? Would like to see if there
Hi All again,
What makes it so expensive to have a certificate? I mean, wouldn't it be
possible to setup a new authority that doesn't charge as much or nothing at
all? Wouldn't the major browsers be willing to support an authority that is
free or costs next to nothing? I pay about $200 a year for
German Geek wrote:
What do you think?
I think just use a flippin' ssl server and be done with it.
When I go to a website that requires me to let them execute JavaScript I
rarely go back.
You can use SSL for the login and only the login - I know that it means
either using a self signed
Michael A. Peters wrote:
German Geek wrote:
What do you think?
I think just use a flippin' ssl server and be done with it.
That was my thought too.
You can use SSL for the login and only the login - I know that it
means either using a self signed cert or paying big bucks, for
I think just use a flippin' ssl server and be done with it.
++$i
When I go to a website that requires me to let them execute JavaScript I
rarely go back.
Many people do this, I hope that the OP realizes this.
You can use SSL for the login and only the login - I know that it means
either
Dotan Cohen wrote:
Have you seen the fit Firefox 3 makes for self-signed certs? So far as
the end user is concerned, the site is inaccesible.
Yes I have.
That's why on my site I have an instruction page - and a demonstration
of how Opera does it, which is just as secure and less of a PITA,
Hi gang,
Was just thinking of a cheap solution for sites that don't require absolute
security. A SSL cert cost about $150 a year. Sites like facebook could use
this... Of course it's not for banks etc.
You could degrade gracefully when javascript is turned off to just sending
the form and
German Geek wrote:
Hi gang,
Was just thinking of a cheap solution for sites that don't require absolute
security. A SSL cert cost about $150 a year. Sites like facebook could use
this...
Sites (like mine) that don't want to pay a certificate authority can use
a self-signed cert. Even Red
Michael A. Peters wrote:
German Geek wrote:
Hi gang,
Was just thinking of a cheap solution for sites that don't require
absolute
security. A SSL cert cost about $150 a year. Sites like facebook
could use
this...
Sites (like mine) that don't want to pay a certificate authority can
use a
Firefox scares its users when they encounter a website with self
signed certificate. If your website users aren't worried about the
warning Firefox throws at them, self signed cert works well.
I just realized Dotan Cohen already mentioned this.
--
With warm regards,
Sudheer. S
Sudheer wrote:
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Sites (like mine) that don't want to pay a certificate authority can
use a self-signed cert. Even Red Hat does for some of their stuff (IE
I believe their bugzilla server)
Firefox scares its users when they encounter a website with self signed
12 matches
Mail list logo
