Chris Stinemetz chrisstinem...@gmail.com wrote:
I would bet it's the quotes screwing up the js. Can / are you
escaping that variable when ajaxing it back?
Bastien Koert
905-904-0334
I found a way to make the ajax work with one form. I removed the table
and the ajax worked just fine.
it's (pretty) easy to send two forms at once with jquery nowadays, you just
get all the input of the 2 forms and post them!
function submit2Forms(form1DomId,form2DomId){
$datas={};
$(form1DomId).find(':input').each(function(){
if(($(this).attr('name')
On 11 Aug 2011, at 19:25, Chris Stinemetz wrote:
I have two forms on the same php script. Is it possible to submit both
forms to the same action=processform.php with a single submit
button?
If so would you give me examples on how to handle this?
Three options spring to mind...
1) Combine
At 02:25 PM 8/11/2011, Chris Stinemetz wrote:
I have two forms on the same php script. Is it possible to submit both
forms to the same action=processform.php with a single submit
button?
If you want to submit at the same time, why do you have two forms?
Ken
--
PHP General Mailing List
If the two forms call the same script that's fine. If not, that will work
too. Just realize that the inputs from one form will NOT be returned to the
script when the submit is used from the other form.
Jim,
This is what I am trying to do. One submit button for both forms going
to the same
I'm thinking that Chris means that he has a 'page' designed that utilizes
two form tags for functionally different sets of input fields. The answer
Chris is that a page can have many forms and whether or not they trigger the
same script upon submit or not doesn't matter. Go ahead!
My sample
Jim,
This is what I am trying to do. One submit button for both forms going
to the same destination.
The only reason I am doing this is because I can't figure out why my
ajax for my select menus is altering my tinyMCE textarea box.
Ultimately if I can figure out how to control the ajax within
Chris,
By definition, a 'submit' button submits a form. Not 2 forms. Each form
has to have it's own form. It is not feasible to submit two forms - since
the conversation from your client pc is going to be garbled even if you
could (JS?) do the second submit. One transactiion is going to
On 2011-08-11, at 9:13 PM, Jim Giner jim.gi...@albanyhandball.com wrote:
Jim,
This is what I am trying to do. One submit button for both forms going
to the same destination.
The only reason I am doing this is because I can't figure out why my
ajax for my select menus is altering my
I would bet it's the quotes screwing up the js. Can / are you escaping that
variable when ajaxing it back?
Bastien Koert
905-904-0334
I found a way to make the ajax work with one form. I removed the table
and the ajax worked just fine. Aparently you can't embed div
containers within a
Richard Lynch wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2005 12:55 pm, dan said:
I was just looking for some sort of confirmity and ease of use. I've
been experimenting with some of my own ways to handle form data.
There's nothing that I hate more than clutter, so that's why I wanted to
break the form apart inside
Dan wrote:
Richard Lynch wrote:
...
The value added of the central switch seems dubious to me.
Just my opinion.
Richard -
I want your opinion, which is why I'm taking a stab at the list ;)
What other methods would be good to use? Using a giant if statement?
Thanks
-dant
Nononono a giant if
Jason Barnett wrote:
Dan wrote:
Richard Lynch wrote:
...
The value added of the central switch seems dubious to me.
Just my opinion.
Richard -
I want your opinion, which is why I'm taking a stab at the list ;)
What other methods would be good to use? Using a giant if statement?
Thanks
-dant
What other methods would be good to use? Using a giant if statement?
Did you read my code for this? It consisted of two lines, which
basicly did the same thing as your massive ugly switch statment. It
also does a limited amount of error-checking, in that it checks to
make sure that the file
Richard Lynch wrote:
While this *CAN* work, and a lot of people like it, it tends to add a fair
amount of cruft for not that much benefit, really...
What do you GAIN having this big old switch statement?
What data/processing is really really shared in all these steps?
On Wed, May 11, 2005 4:57 pm,
On Thu, May 12, 2005 12:55 pm, dan said:
I was just looking for some sort of confirmity and ease of use. I've
been experimenting with some of my own ways to handle form data.
There's nothing that I hate more than clutter, so that's why I wanted to
break the form apart inside of these smaller
Personally I'm lazy, but I'd probably go with something along the lines of
$filename = sprintf(step%d.php, (int)($_SESSION['step']) );
require ( file_exists($filename) ? $filename : step1.php );
same results in two lines of code - was one line, but I split it into
two lines to make it more
While this *CAN* work, and a lot of people like it, it tends to add a fair
amount of cruft for not that much benefit, really...
What do you GAIN having this big old switch statement?
What data/processing is really really shared in all these steps?
On Wed, May 11, 2005 4:57 pm, dan said:
Hello,
On Monday 17 September 2001 06:01, Nikola Veber wrote:
Hi !
I have a form
form target = ?php echo $PHP_SELF ?; METHOD = get
Is there a way to open PHP_SELF in the same window, not in the new one ?
It should be
form action = ?php echo $PHP_SELF; ? METHOD = get
target is used as the name of
Well,
form action=?php echo $PHP_SELF; ? method=get
always works fine for me.
Note that you should use action instead of target, and the semicolon
after $PHP_SELF should be inside the ? not outside of it... might be one of
these two errors causing the problem (although I can't think why)
On Monday 17 September 2001 15:24, you wrote:
Well,
form action=?php echo $PHP_SELF; ? method=get
always works fine for me.
Note that you should use action instead of target, and the semicolon
after $PHP_SELF should be inside the ? not outside of it... might be one
of these two errors
21 matches
Mail list logo
