On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote:
> Curiously enough Pierre just said this in php.pecl.dev (Thu, 29 Aug 2013
> 19:59:01 +0200):
>>You can also get some here:
>>
>>http://windows.php.net/downloads/pecl/ snaps or releases
>>
>>which is about to be the place where pecl official bi
Ferenc Kovacs in php.internals (Sat, 31 Aug 2013 23:18:09 +0200):
>> PS. The beta for php.net has its problems as well. There is no
>> equivalent (yet?) for http://www.php.net/downloads.php
>> I switched back to the old site because of this.
>
>http://www.php.net/downloads.php?beta=1 ?
>maybe the l
> PS. The beta for php.net has its problems as well. There is no
> equivalent (yet?) for http://www.php.net/downloads.php
> I switched back to the old site because of this.
>
>
http://www.php.net/downloads.php?beta=1 ?
maybe the link is missing to that page?
--
Ferenc Kovács
@Tyr43l - http://tyra
Curiously enough Pierre just said this in php.pecl.dev (Thu, 29 Aug 2013
19:59:01 +0200):
>You can also get some here:
>
>http://windows.php.net/downloads/pecl/ snaps or releases
>
>which is about to be the place where pecl official binaries will be
>always be available, with links from pecl.php.ne
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Johannes Schlüter
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there has been some chatter about windows.php.net, which drives me to
> the question: Do we need that site? Why and for what?
>
> Few data items:
> * The "news" on w.p.n are not really maintained and provide
> outdat
