ID: 36470
Updated by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reported By: chen dot daqi at gmail dot com
Status: Open
-Bug Type: Strings related
+Bug Type: Documentation problem
Operating System: Linux
PHP Version: 5.1.2
New Comment:
Reclassified as docu p
Am 21.02.2006 um 19:57 schrieb Nuno Lopes:
...
BTW, I don't agree with an 'accept' system. With that, almost zero
notes will be approved each day, because no one will like to take
the responsability to approve a note. Delete/reject is much simpler
and provides a faster way to have good no
Sebastian-H. Picklum wrote:
> Ohhh. Since when do we have that? Seems that I missed the news... :-)
It's been around for quite a while. 1.5 years, I'd guess. I blogged
about it a few months back.
S
Ohhh. Since when do we have that? Seems that I missed the news... :-)
Sebastian
Am 21.02.2006 um 19:44 schrieb Sean Coates:
Sebastian-H. Picklum wrote:
Note weeding in the current form is really not that comfortable. An
interface where you can see all newly submitted notes that have
not b
> Sebastian-H. Picklum wrote:
> > Hmm, you are completely right. But it's still not that
> accessible for
> > our fellow programmers who are visually impaired.
>
> I have 4961 messages in my PHP-Notes box that I simply
> haven't had the motivation to check.
>
> Note weeding is a tedious and t
> Another option (in the short-term) is to simply required a valid email
> address (most of the spam seems to come from the default
> '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' or '[email protected]').
Haven't checked the code recently, but I'm pretty sure a blank name
results in [email protected] and a
Another option (in the short-term) is to simply required a valid email
address (most of the spam seems to come from the default
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' or '[email protected]').
M
Nuno Lopes wrote:
I don't like those annoying images either. But we must do something..
I'm tired of receivin
ID: 36474
Updated by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reported By: mrgrier at yahoo dot com
Status: Open
Bug Type: Documentation problem
Operating System: Any
PHP Version: Irrelevant
New Comment:
Yeh I agree.
Doing that shouldn't be difficult. the .re file
I don't like those annoying images either. But we must do something.. I'm
tired of receiving a lot of spam notes every day.
Using the same system as the bugs site seems to be the best choice.. because
my attempts to stop spam (by checking IPs blacklists and by using words
blacklist) didn't work
> I would oppose a CAPTCHA, they are evil.
Do you have a better solution?
S
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006, Sean Coates wrote:
> If we do go to a non-handicap-friendly (pardon my use of the word
> "handicap" if it's not PC this week) solution, we could always add a
> note along the lines of "Note to the visually impaired: this form
> contains spam protection in the form of a CAPTCHA
> +1 to "If you experience difficulty with the CAPTCHA image, you can
> submit a note by sending an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
> There's no need to limit this option to the visually impaired; it's
> also applicable to Mr. Joe Text Browser. :)
Agreed.
S
Sebastian-H. Picklum wrote:
> Note weeding in the current form is really not that comfortable. An
> interface where you can see all newly submitted notes that have not been
> rejected or deleted (or verified) already would safe a lot of time. That
> way, every message gets reviewed.
Like so?
http:
On 2/21/06, Sean Coates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sebastian-H. Picklum wrote:
> > Hmm, you are completely right. But it's still not that accessible for
> > our fellow programmers who are visually impaired.
>
> I have 4961 messages in my PHP-Notes box that I simply haven't had the
> motivation to
Okay, posting to php-notes@ would be another solution.
But on the other hand: Why don't we check the submitted notes for
specific words that are only used in SPAM messages in the first place
and mark them as suspicious on [EMAIL PROTECTED] So the SPAM-Protection is
transparent and finding p
Sebastian-H. Picklum wrote:
> Hmm, you are completely right. But it's still not that accessible for
> our fellow programmers who are visually impaired.
I have 4961 messages in my PHP-Notes box that I simply haven't had the
motivation to check.
Note weeding is a tedious and thankless task, so I'm
Thanks Kohei -- I committed your patch (and will take a look at
xml_proto.php to see if it needs a corresponding tweak).
Dan
On 2/21/06, Kohei Yoshida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> In working with the phpdoc xml files from CVS I've made some minor
> modifications. Please see the att
dbs Tue Feb 21 16:45:06 2006 UTC
Modified files:
/phpdoc/en/reference/pdo/functions PDOStatement-closeCursor.xml
PDOStatement-getColumnMeta.xml
Log:
Apply Kohei Yoshida's patch for correct entities inside comments.
Thanks Owain.
Committed the patch.
Dan
On 2/21/06, Owain Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm a coop student working at ibm and I've been assigned to update the
> idb_db2 docs for the PHP manual. I added some constants definitions as
> follows:
>
>
> As of release 1.1.6, users can s
dbs Tue Feb 21 16:42:41 2006 UTC
Modified files:
/phpdoc/en/reference/ibm_db2constants.xml
/phpdoc/en/reference/ibm_db2/functions db2-connect.xml
db2-pconnect.xml
Log:
As of release 1.1.6, users
Hi there,
In working with the phpdoc xml files from CVS I've made some minor
modifications. Please see the attachment for the diff output. The two
instances of "&Description" were changed to "&Description;" because they
were chalking my XML parser. It may not matter much because they are
both w
vrana Tue Feb 21 16:23:49 2006 UTC
Modified files:
/phpdoc/en/reference/sdo_das_xml/functions SDO-DAS-XML-addTypes.xml
SDO-DAS-XML-createDocument.xml
SDO-DAS-XML-saveFil
Hi,
I'm a coop student working at ibm and
I've been assigned to update the idb_db2 docs for the PHP manual. I
added some constants definitions as follows:
As of release 1.1.6, users can set DB2_ATTR_CASE
as a connection attribute.
As of release 1.2.0, users can set CURSOR
type as a connection
ID: 36461
Updated by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reported By: mgkimsal at gmail dot com
-Status: Open
+Status: Bogus
Bug Type: Documentation problem
Operating System: All
PHP Version: Irrelevant
New Comment:
Wow, I misread your results assumi
ID: 29534
Updated by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reported By: tomas_matousek at hotmail dot com
-Status: Bogus
+Status: Open
Bug Type: Documentation problem
Operating System: WinXP
PHP Version: 5.0.0
New Comment:
Maybe we shouldn't, but we ca
Hmm, you are completely right. But it's still not that accessible for
our fellow programmers who are visually impaired.
Sebastian
Am 21.02.2006 um 15:27 schrieb Jared Williams:
Well atm, no lynx or braille terminals can submit a bug (afaik) so
not sure how much of a problem that is.
Ja
Well atm, no lynx or braille terminals can submit a bug (afaik) so not sure how
much of a problem that is.
Jared
> This CSS-obfuscation would generate problems with text-only
> readers (lynx or braille terminals), so I don't think it's a
> good idea.
>
>
> Viele Grüße
>
> Sebastian
>
>
This CSS-obfuscation would generate problems with text-only readers
(lynx or braille terminals), so I don't think it's a good idea.
Viele Grüße
Sebastian
Am 21.02.2006 um 13:49 schrieb Jared Williams:
How about this one, I've been experimenting with, uses plain HTML
obfuscating the code
How about this one, I've been experimenting with, uses plain HTML obfuscating
the code with various css techiques.
http://ren.dotgeek.org/ex/captchacss.php
http://ren.dotgeek.org/ex/captchacss.phps
Jared
>
> I don't think that the math-test would prevent much spam.
> It's very easy to auto
I don't think that the math-test would prevent much spam. It's very
easy to automatically read and solve these equations.
Would a verified note submission (e.g. the user provides his eMail-
address and he gets a message where he has to click on a link to
publish his note) be a better solutio
ID: 36474
Updated by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reported By: mrgrier at yahoo dot com
Status: Open
Bug Type: Documentation problem
Operating System: Any
PHP Version: Irrelevant
New Comment:
We don't actually implement the things that are written ther
From: mrgrier at yahoo dot com
Operating system: Any
PHP version: Irrelevant
PHP Bug Type: Documentation problem
Bug description: strtotime: GNU Date Input Format link changed again
Description:
strtotime
GNU Date Input Format link changed again, to:
http://www.
Derick Rethans wrote:
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006, Dan Scott wrote:
Spammers suck.
I would be in favour of implementing a basic mathematical
skill-testing question a la Lukas Smith's blog at
http://pooteeweet.org -- it is a protection method that is still
accessible to the visually impaired, unlike cl
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006, Dan Scott wrote:
> Spammers suck.
>
> I would be in favour of implementing a basic mathematical
> skill-testing question a la Lukas Smith's blog at
> http://pooteeweet.org -- it is a protection method that is still
> accessible to the visually impaired, unlike classic CAPTCHA
Spammers suck.
I would be in favour of implementing a basic mathematical
skill-testing question a la Lukas Smith's blog at
http://pooteeweet.org -- it is a protection method that is still
accessible to the visually impaired, unlike classic CAPTCHA.
Dan
On 2/21/06, Friedhelm Betz <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Hi all,
user notes are spammed in recent days/weeks.
Should we protect the submission form in some sane way (CAPTCHA)?
Friedhelm
36 matches
Mail list logo
