Re: [PHP-DOC] PHP 4 refs in the manual

2010-02-22 Thread Stanislav Malyshev
Hi! > The most recent discussion of this stemmed from > http://news.php.net/php.doc/969381304 Ah, missed that, thanks. Changelog idea seems excellent, right now the clutter with all those "in 4.0.3 we added this, and in 4.1.3 we changed this" inside the manual really starts to be annoying. -- St

Re: [PHP-DOC] PHP 4 refs in the manual

2010-02-22 Thread Christopher Jones
Stanislav Malyshev wrote: Hi! Now that PHP 4 is officially dead for more than 2 years, do you think it makes sense to remove references to versions like 4.0.X from the manual, to reduce clutter? Or they are still useful? Overall +1, but history back to 4.4 is useful. The most recent discu

[PHP-DOC] PHP 4 refs in the manual

2010-02-22 Thread Stanislav Malyshev
Hi! Now that PHP 4 is officially dead for more than 2 years, do you think it makes sense to remove references to versions like 4.0.X from the manual, to reduce clutter? Or they are still useful? -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect [email protected] http://www.zend.com/ (408)253-8829

Re: [PHP-DOC] Ideas to Php.net

2010-02-22 Thread Christopher Jones
Jesús Cova wrote: Good afternoon, i'm writting you because i propose some ideas that i want to work in PHP.net if you allow me. Mr. Magnusson wrote me that i must write to this email to notify it, i want to improve the tutorials part, i want to become it more friendly and understable to those