Please use the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list. This is the wrong place
to ask.
Kunal Aggarwal wrote:
Dear friend,
I am using PHP 4.3.4 version.
Please tell how to unpload a mail function.
Error comes on executing mail function is
*"mail(): SMTP server response: 550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for
[EMAIL PRO
Nuno Lopes wrote:
I doubt we are able to mix them in one section. They all stand for
different functionality and should be described in proper sections, i.e.
call, set and get -- oop5.overloading.
But I like your idea: oop5.magic should include tostring, autoload and
*, imho.
- oop5.intro : I
Hello, Curt.
Curt Zirzow wrote:
* Thus wrote Boris Bezrukov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
...
Well, instanceof is already added, exceptions need to be another part in
the language section, but we need to integrate the __autoload() stuff
here, since it does not fit elsewhere.
Uhm. New
Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
language/oop5.xml language.oop5 : Object-Oriented Programming in PHP5
First this section needs an intro part describing that the PHP 5 OO is
different and offers much more than the PHP 4 OO, while keeping
backwards compatibility (except a few changes which are described in th
language/oop5.xml language.oop5 : Object-Oriented Programming in PHP5
ID : Title
- oop5.decon : Unified Constructors and Destructors
- oop5.visibility : Public, Private, Protected Members and Properties
- oop5.static : Static Methods and Properties
- oop5.constants : P
lovchy Wed May 26 08:29:18 2004 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/en/appendices migration5.xml
Log:
Entity replaced with right value
http://cvs.php.net/diff.php/phpdoc/en/appendices/migration5.xml?r1=1.19&r2=1.20&ty=u
Index: phpdoc/en/appendices/migration5.xml
d
Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
> Two notes on this.
>
> - Noone said that PHP should be replaced with &php; in the manual,
> in fact some people opposed this *idea*. So this was not a good idea
> at all here. Thos suggesting &php; have not yet provided reasons
> on why this would be good (or I hav
> Two notes on this.
>
> - Noone said that PHP should be replaced with &php; in the manual,
> in fact some people opposed this *idea*. So this was not a good idea
> at all here. Thos suggesting &php; have not yet provided reasons
> on why this would be good (or I have missed those reasons).
S
Hello, Hojtsy.
Modified files: /phpdoc/en/appendices
migration5.xml Log:
Changes in PHP5/Zend2 inserted into OOP section
Two notes on this.
- Noone said that PHP should be replaced with &php; in the manual,
in fact some people opposed this *idea*. So this was not a g
lovchy Mon May 24 09:34:24 2004 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/en/appendices migration5.xml
Log:
Error Reporting section added
http://cvs.php.net/diff.php/phpdoc/en/appendices/migration5.xml?r1=1.16&r2=1.17&ty=u
Index: phpdoc/en/appendices/migration5.xml
dif
lovchy Sun May 23 12:30:39 2004 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/en/appendices migration5.xml
Log:
Changes in PHP5/Zend2 inserted into OOP section
http://cvs.php.net/diff.php/phpdoc/en/appendices/migration5.xml?r1=1.15&r2=1.16&ty=u
Index: phpdoc/en/appendices/m
11 matches
Mail list logo
